On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions

Description:

On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions ... Cjant =Anthropogenic carbon calculated from observations at site i ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sarafl3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions


1
On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of
Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions
  • Sara Mikaloff Fletcher, Nicolas Gruber, Andrew
    Jacobson, Scott Doney, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Mick
    Follows, Keith Lindsay, Dimitris Menemenlis, Anne
    Mouchet

2
Anthropogenic Carbon (µmol/Kg)
  • Cant is the component of DIC due to elevated
    atmospheric CO2
  • Estimated from observations of DIC and other
    ocean tracers using the ?C method (Gruber et
    al., 1996).

3
The Ocean Inversion
  • The inverse model finds the combination of carbon
    fluxes from a discrete number of ocean regions
    that optimally fit the observations
  • Cjant Anthropogenic carbon calculated from
    observations at site i
  • xi Magnitude of the flux from region i
  • Hi,j The modelled response of a unit flux from
    region i at station j, called the basis function
  • eError associated with the method

The model regions and observations used in the
ocean inversion
4
Key Questions
  • Are the inverse estimates robust with respect to
    ocean transport?
  • Are the inverse estimates robust with respect to
    uncertainty in Cant?
  • What have we learned?

5
Anthropogenic Carbon FluxScaled to 1995
North
6
(No Transcript)
7
Uncertainty in Anthropogenic Carbon Estimates
  • Matsumoto and Gruber (submitted, 2004)
  • Stoichiometric ratios used to remove the signal
    due to biological activity (Anderson and
    Sarmiento, 1994)
  • Low Rco
  • High Rco

8
Anthropogenic Carbon Bias (PRINCE-RDS model)
North
9
Global Total Anthropogenic Carbon Uptake Scaled
to 1995 (Pg C/yr)
Model OCMIP-2 forward model Inverse Model
ECCO NA 2.10
MIT NA 2.20
MOM-LL 1.84 1.93
MOM-HH 2.35 2.33
MOM-LHS 1.98 2.06
MOM-RDS 2.29 2.20
MOM-RDS 2.16 2.28
UL 2.94 2.77
Mean (Range) 2.26 (1.84 2.94) 2.23 (1.93 2.77)
10
Inverse Model Forward Model
North
11
Conclusions
  • The broad features of the ocean inversion are
    robust
  • The greatest source of uncertainty is model
    transport
  • The largest spread between models occurs in the
    Southern Ocean
  • The anthropogenic carbon inventories call for
  • Global anthropogenic carbon uptake of 1.95 to
    2.77 Pg C/yr
  • Equator-ward transport from high-latitudes, with
    storage at mid-latitudes
  • Some cross-equatorial transport
  • Compared to the forward simulations, the inverse
    estimates find
  • Greater uptake in the Southern Ocean between 44S
    and 58S and the Indian Ocean
  • Less uptake throughout most of the pacific ocean

12
Sources of Uncertainty in the Inverse Estimates
  • Modeled transport
  • Anthropogenic Carbon Estimates
  • Implicit assumptions
  • Ocean transport is in steady state
  • Anthropogenic carbon uptake is proportional to
    the atmospheric carbon perturbation
  • Inverse methodology
  • Aggregation error
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com