Modelling: The Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Modelling: The Science

Description:

Actuary's role is to assess/measure/evaluate/price or reserve for future ... Ascribe values (or specified distributions) to the parameters using past ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: friendspro
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modelling: The Science


1
Chapter 7
Asset-Liability Management for Actuaries
  • Modelling The Science Art of the Actuary

Shane Whelan, L527
2
Introduction
  • The work of science is to substitute facts for
    appearances and demonstrations for impressions.
  • Ruskin often quoted in publications by SoA
    (US).
  • Actuarys role is to assess/measure/evaluate/price
    or reserve for future contingent events and
    assess/measure/evaluate and mitigate the
    associated risk(s).
  • To do so, the actuary needs a model
  • Building a model is part of the actuarial control
    cycle.
  • But that required model (or meta-model) will
    generally build on many smaller models
  • e.g. a life table is a model, used as input to,
    say, profit test.
  • Your technical training to date has exposed you
    to many simple models we use these as building
    blocks to help model a clients or employers
    problem.

3
Actuarial Control Cycle
Context of Business/Economic/Commercial
Environment
Specifying the Purpose of Model
Professional Considerations
Monitoring the experience to update model
Developing a Model
4
Examples of Modelling (by Actuaries)
  • Assessing the net present value of a capital
    project
  • Valuing life assurance liabilities in the context
    on assets held
  • For statutory purposes, to help decide bonus
    policy on with profits business, etc.
  • Valuing a (defined benefit) pension fund to
    advise on a contribution rate
  • Valuing the liabilities of a general insurer in
    the context of assets held
  • For statutory purposes, management purposes, or
    otherwise.
  • Profit test a new product, and help set premium
    rates.
  • Asset-liability Modelling (ALM) to find least
    risk investment portfolio for a given portfolio
    of liabilities.
  • To model the future financial trajectory of a
    life office (the model office) to estimate
    future capital needs, future bonus rates,
    investigate impact of new products, etc so to aid
    the management of the company.

5
Examples of Modelling (by Actuaries) (Cont.)
  • To estimate the appraisal value of a companythis
    is defined as a measure of the present value to
    shareholders of the future stream of
    distributable profits (and residual wind-up value
    if any).
  • So the change in appraisal value over time gives
    a measure of value-added.
  • Appraisal value is the sum of the following three
    items
  • Net worth (of company) the amount that could be
    distributed to shareholders immediately.
  • Value of in-force business the present value of
    the future distributable profits to shareholders
    from the existing in-force business.
  • Value of new business the present value of the
    future distributable profits to shareholders from
    future new business. Sometimes this component of
    value is called goodwill.
  • Embedded value is defined as net worth plus value
    of in-force business.
  • A new modelling exercise is liability-driven
    investment (LDI), which attempts to ensure the
    market value of assets exactly increases in line
    with then value of a liability portfolio,
  • through swaps (real interest rate, nominal
    interest rate, equity, currency, etc), and
    options (generally OTC) and any other instruments
  • This is ALM for the 21st century.

6
Modelling
  • Model a simple, stylised imitation of a real
    world system or process.
  • Used to predict how process might respond to
    given changes enabling results of possible
    actions to be assessed
  • or simply to understand how system will evolve in
    the future.
  • Other methods being too slow, too risky, or too
    expensive.
  • Objective of Model is paramount
  • we need to know what is best model and this is
    generally not the most accurate model need to
    balance cost with benefits.
  • There is a place for the back of the envelope
    model.
  • All models are wrong, but some are useful.
    George Box.
  • Constraints in model building are time, budget,
    available data, other resources (your toolkit of
    models) and your know-how (experience).
  • e.g., macroeconometric model of economy
  • Price of share at each future date
  • Model life office

7
Modelling
  • So model has to be fit-for-purpose
  • two models of the same system may be completely
    different if they have different purposes
  • Model to value life office for purchase or sale
  • Model to determine the solvency position
  • Also remember that there are different
    stakeholders, each wanting a different bias in
    the model
  • E.g., setting transfer values for early leavers
    of a defined benefit pension scheme.
  • Finally remember that professional guidance,
    through guidance notes, can be very prescriptive
  • in detailing how the modelling is to be done,
    requirements the model must satisfy (e.g.,
    consistency), or checks that must be made (e.g.,
    data reasonableness and consistent with past
    data). Sensitive testing which is testing the
    sensitivity of the output to parameter inputs
    would generally be necessary.

8
Classifying Models
  • Deterministic Model Unique output for given set
    of inputs. The output or inputs are not random
    variables.
  • Stochastic Model Output is a random variable.
    Perhaps some inputs are also random variables.
  • So models not just the expected output but our
    uncertainty of that output. Hence models risk
    too.
  • A deterministic model can be seen as a special
    case of a stochastic model.
  • Revision See my class-pages on Introduction to
    Models Stochastic Model and printout text of
    Chapter 1.

9
Contrasting Deterministic Stochastic Models
10
Further Terminology in Modelling
  • Scenario modelling using different sets of
    economic conditions to forecast deterministically
    the model predictions
  • E.g., best estimate, prudent, pessimistic and
    optimistic bases
  • This outlines the range of possible outcomes, in
    a simpler and quicker manner than stochastic
    modelling
  • Can use percentile values of parameters, if
    distribution known, to approximate a stochastic
    model
  • Scenario testing this is scenario modelling
    above, but used to ensure compliance with a
    minimum standard set by the regulator. Generally
    each of the scenario tested is adverse relative
    to current conditions.
  • Resilience testing is an example of this for life
    offices, where the appointed actuary must certify
    that assets will cover liabilities even if long
    term interest rates rise or fall by 3 and equity
    values fall by 25 on the valuation date. The
    extra amount of reserves to comply with this is
    known as the resilience test reserve.

11
Further Terminology in Modelling
  • Sensitivity Testing running the model with
    different assumptions (e.g. mean value of
    parameters, distribution of parameters, etc) to
    assess which assumptions the output is most
    sensitive to.
  • This is crucial in validating the model for use
  • It highlights key dependencies of model which
    must be communicated
  • It is used to obtain a deeper understanding of
    the process
  • E.g., profit testing, where better understanding
    might prompt change in product design.
  • Models can be divided into
  • Demographic models used to model numbers of
    individuals in different categories
  • e,.g., decrement model of life table or
    multi-state model for sickness or disability
    insurance
  • Economic models used to model relationship
    between economic, financial and investment
    drivers
  • E.g., inflation, earnings, interest rates, equity
    yields and returns. Particular attention must be
    paid to the relationship between them.
  • Other models defined by what they model.

12
Further Terminology in Modelling
  • Models can also be divided by the (mathematical
    or financial) properties of the model
  • Such as the generic form of model - market
    consistent models, no-arbitrage models, diffusion
    processes, mean reversion process, ARCH, Markov,
    Levy process,.
  • Fully dynamic model is a stochastic model which
    incorporates decision making rules, dependent on
    future output.
  • E.g., if used for model office it would change
    bonus declarations on with profits business
    depending on prevailing interest rates and
    forecast asset shares, etc.
  • Dynamic modelling is used in dynamic financial
    analysis (DFA))
  • Customer lifetime value (CLV) models the value
    of customers rather than contracts, as customer
    loyalty and propensity to purchase more products
    is an intangible asset.
  • Can answer questions
  • such as the discount or special terms banks might
    give to students to start an account with them
  • Or the goodwill to be paid for a business with
    customers that overlap yours

13
Attributes of a Good Model
  • Model must be relevant to exercise at hand,
    produce outputs that are credible, and be
    adequately documented.
  • This is the minimum that can be expected.
  • The model should shed light on the risk profile
    of the process modelled (e.g., financial product,
    scheme or contract design)
  • All factors that could significantly affect the
    advice being given are incorporated in the model
    or modelling exercise.
  • Any financial drivers risk discount rate,
    statutory reserves, etc, reasonable variation in
    parameters.
  • The estimated parameter values of the model
    should reflect the business being modelled and
    the economic and business environment.
  • This means the pecularities of the product size
    of premium, early lapse rate, presence of options
    or guaranteed, etc.
  • The parameters in the model should be
    self-consistent.
  • So inflation, return on assets, risk discount
    rate, lapse rate, escalation of expenses, should
    all be mutually consistent.

14
Attributes of a Good Model (Cont.)
  • The outputs of the model should appear reasonable
  • Reproduce historic episodes
  • Capable of independent verification/peer review
  • Possible to communicate key results to client
  • Subject to all the above, the simplest model is
    the best
  • As is cheaper to develop and run
  • Easier to interpret and communicate
  • Everything should be made as simple as possible,
    but not simpler." Albert Einstein

15
Deterministic or Stochastic Model?
  • A deterministic model is, in general, simpler
    than a stochastic model
  • And, in particular, its results are easier to
    communicate (try taking of gamma distributions
    and Levy processes to Trustees of a pension
    fund!)
  • It is easier to develop, to interpret and quicker
    to run.
  • It is also clearer what scenarios have been
    testedbut these are not implicit in the model,
    but made external to it as part of the wider
    modelling process.
  • However, only a limited number of scenarios are
    run..
  • The modelling exercise may have missed one that
    is particularly detrimental this is important
    when contract has embedded options (e.g., to
    extend life cover without underwriting) or
    guaranteed (e.g., surrender value not lower than
    premiums paid). So make scenario testing implicit
    in model a stochastic model.
  • We might need to model explicitly the probability
    of each outcome (e.g. to price embedded option).
    Hence we require a stochastic model.

16
Deterministic or Stochastic Model? (Cont.)
  • Sometimes model must allow for dynamic feedback
    that is the future evolution of system depends on
    what happens in the future this requires a
    stochastic model top trace the different possible
    paths and their likelihood.
  • E.g., bonus declarations or policy depends on
    performance of assets
  • E.g., discretionary rises to pensions in payment
    given level of inflation and past service surplus
    at the future time.
  • Stochastic models are more complex so need to be
    satisfied that
  • extra output (and time needed to develop and run
    and interpret and communicate) is justified
  • Do we know underlying distributions of the
    parameter(s) we sufficient accuracy (or are we
    just introducing spurious accuracy?)
  • Considerable judgment required to factor in
    variability of parameters, relationship between
    parameters (correlation, coppulas), and dynamic
    decision feedback.
  • Often a combination of stochastic and
    deterministic models are used
  • Economic models (where the output has a high
    dependency on inputs) are often modelled
    stochastically.
  • Demographic models are often modelled
    deterministically (as variability is less
    material to output).

17
Quick Question
  • Indicate whether a deterministic or stochastic
    model is appropriate to
  • Price a guarantee on the lowest interest rate
    that an annuity will be sold at in the future.
  • To set a contribution rate on a defined benefit
    pension scheme
  • How much capital a company should maintain to
    that the probability of insolvency within a year
    is less than x.
  • For statutory valuation of a life office
  • What reinsurance arrangements (excess of loss,
    stop loss, etc) gives best value for money when
    claims variability is set to prescribed limit.
  • The net present value of a project
  • The asset portfolio that best matches
    salary-related benefits.

18
Building a Deterministic or Stochastic Model 10
Helpful Steps
  • Set well-defined objectives for modelthe purpose
    of the model/investigation
  • Plan how model is to be validated
  • i.e., the diagnostic tests to ensure it meets
    objectives
  • Define the essence of the structural model the
    1st order approximation. Refinement and details
    can come later.
  • This involves specifying the form of the model,
    identifying the parameters, input and output
    variables.
  • Involve experts on the real world system to get
    feedback on conceptual model
  • Collect analyse data for model (and any other
    parameters)
  • Ascribe values (or specified distributions) to
    the parameters using past experience, appropriate
    estimated techniques, and (properly documented)
    professional judgement.
  • NB If stochastic model, specify correlation (or
    other relationship) between variables.

19
Building a Model 10 Helpful Steps
  • Test the reasonableness of the output from the
    model and otherwise analyse output.
  • Check that goodness-of-fit is acceptable by
    reproducing past episodes.
  • Estimate distribution of the error term in model
    (from not modelling certain factors that have an
    affect on output)
  • Start again if fit not acceptable maybe moving
    to 2nd order model.
  • Test sensitivity of output to input parameters
  • i.e., ensure small change to inputs has small
    affect on output. We do not want a chaotic
    system in actuarial applications if so,
    redesign product, reinsure, or take other action
    to make financial output tractable.
  • If stochastic model ensure result reasonably
    robust to assumed distribution of input
    parameters where unknown
  • Perform scenario modelling best estimate,
    cautious, optimistic, etc.
  • This involves changing the parameter inputs (the
    set of assumptions underlying the parameterised
    model is often termed the basis. Typically there
    is an economic basis and a demographic basis.)
  • NB If stochastic model, run model many times
    using random sample from the input random
    variables, producing an empirical distribution of
    the output random variable(s).

20
Data underlying model
  • Communicate and document results and the model.
  • Arrange for emerging actual experience to be
    monitored in a suitable way.
  • i.e., put in place a system to collect data so
    that actual experience can be compared with
    expected experience
  • Review model and update in the light of new data
    and other changes. This is part of the on-going
    monitoring.

21
Case Study Models for Pricing
  • We want to develop a model to help determine the
    charging structure (e.g. premium) for a new
    product that meets the companys profit
    requirement.
  • This, as so often in actuarial modelling, will
    have at its heart a cashflow model
  • The different income (premiums) and outgo from
    office (expenses, claims, etc) at each future
    time
  • Two primary questions
  • How frequently do I model the cashflows?
  • Annually, monthly, etc.
  • Perhaps monthly for first few years and
    thereafter annually. Variable time period that
    exploits key sensitivities of the profit.
  • What premium is assumed, what age, what term of
    policy, what gender of policholder ? Or, in
    general, what any other rating factor or metric
    for size or term of policy?
  • Here the choice is infinite. Use the concept of
    model point

22
Model Point
  • A model point is a representative single points
    to use to model key characteristic of a larger
    group.
  • Each within the larger group acts in all
    important respects, like the model point.
  • So, a judicious selection of model points enables
    us to model the entire system.
  • We just need to scale up the model point
    multiply the result at the model point by the
    expected number in the subgroup it represents.
  • Normally one does not have to use model points in
    valuing existing business/doing valuations
  • Because regulation requires valuation
    policy-by-policy
  • Because it is simpler to do all pension fund
    valuations.
  • But can use model points for what if
    investigations.
  • In the pricing example, the model point is a
    policy.
  • Some experimentation might be needed to establish
    the model points.
  • Then choose the number so that, when scaled up,
    the expected new business is satisfactory
    modelled.

23
Case Study Models for Pricing (Cont.)
  • For each model point the cashflows are projected
  • Allowing for future reserves on the statutory
    basis
  • Allowing for solvency margin requirements
  • The net projected cashflows are discounted at the
    risk discount rated
  • Reflecting the return required by the company
  • With due allowance for the risk (variability)
    inherent in the cashflow this requires some
    judgement
  • Variability in model (if stochastic)
  • Parameter risk
  • Model risk
  • Could use a stochastic discount rate.
  • Should a different discount rate be applied to
    each type of cashflow?

24
Case Study Models for Pricing (Cont.)
  • The premium or charging structure for each model
    point can now be set so as to produce the
    required profit.
  • So scale up.
  • So, adopt common scale so average profit over
    business is satisfactory
  • Beware of cross-subsidy
  • Interpolate for policies between model points.
  • The most important part of pricing is to set
    competitive premiums (subject to profit margin)
  • If not, try to differentiate product from
    competitors by adding features.
  • Or remove features than are expensive (options)
    or add to the riskiness (guarantees)
  • Reconsider distribution channel (e.g., so as to
    increase average premium size)
  • Reconsider companys target profit
  • Reconsider whether to go ahead with the product
  • Consider capital requirements of the policy, and
    their timing.
  • Maybe redesign if too capital intensive.
  • What about one-off development costs not
    amortised in cashflowmust add in.
  • The pricing model can be developed to model the
    future cashflows of the entire businessthe model
    office

25
Example
  • A unit-linked policy guarantees to pay a maturity
    value of the greater of the bid value of units or
    the sum of premiums paid. On termination prior to
    maturity, the surrender value is the bid value of
    the units.
  • Outline the steps involved in pricing the
    guarantee, the type of modelling involved, and
    the key assumptions determining the price.

26
Completes Chapter 7
Asset-Liability Management for Actuaries
  • Modelling The Science Art of the Actuary

Shane Whelan, L527
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com