Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating radar GPR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating radar GPR

Description:

It belongs to an Archaean greenstone belt, in the border zone between the. Archaean area and the Palaeoproterozoic North Karelian Schist Belt. 12. Hannu Luodes, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: maeg6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating radar GPR


1
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • The 15th Meeting of the Association of European
    Geological Societies
  • 1620 September 2007
  • Tallinn, Estonia

2
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Location of the study areas

3
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • The ground penetrating radar instrumentation
  • GSSI SIR 2000 control unit
  • Antennae between 40 MHz and 400 MHz

200 MHz antenna
Control unit
4
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • Porphyritic granite situated in the south-eastern
    Finland
  • It belongs to the Central Finland granitoid
    complex and is described
  • postkinematic in relation to the deformation of
    the area

5
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1

6
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • Typical feature of the rock is a strong
    horizontal exfoliation type fracturing (height of
    the bench about 5 m)

7
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • GPR measurement traverse of 65 m in length
    (vertical and horizontal scale are equal)
  • The profile was corrected with altitude data to
    present the actual surface and fractures
    orientation

8
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • The GPR was able to detect the major horizontal
    and sub-horizontal fracturing

9
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • Vertical or near vertical fractures were
    difficult to detect due to their small reflection
    surface towards the measuring antenna

10
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 1
  • The horizontal fractures near the surface were
    sometimes strongly weathered providing space for
    surface water to collect
  • Those spots were detected as individual targets
    on the radar measurement profile
  • The spots can be thought to be reflections from a
    sub-horizontal fracture zone near the surface

11
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 2

Soapstone situated in North Karelia It belongs to
an Archaean greenstone belt, in the border zone
between the Archaean area and the
Palaeoproterozoic North Karelian Schist Belt
12
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 2

Typical North Karelian soapstone Sample size 260
mm x 200 mm
13
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 2

Soapstone quarry in North Karelia
14
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 2
  • With the soapstone, the measurements revealed
    more of the internal structure of the rock,
    making the detection of the fracturing complex
  • Especially internal lineation was quite well
    visible in those sections where the stone
    contained more conductive minerals.

15
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Study area 2
  • Large open horizontal fractures were detectable
    also in this stone type, which can be helpful in
    planning of the quarrying operations.

16
Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating
radar (GPR)
  • Conclusions
  • Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is suitable for
    large-scale quality assessment of natural stone
    deposits and quarries
  • The measurements are easy and quick to do and the
    preliminary results can be evaluated immediately
  • The fracture detection level varies depending on
    the used equipment, mainly on the frequency
  • The development in GPS technology has made it
    possible to position the measurements accurately
    and thus trace back the results into the quarry
    to help extraction planning
  • The differences in the measurement results and
    their interpretation found among these two rock
    types indicate the importance of knowing the
    electromagnetic properties and mineralogy of the
    stone
  • Also knowing the geological structure and other
    characteristics of the stone beforehand helps to
    avoid false interpretations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com