Multi-Model%20Ensembles%20for%20Climate%20Attribution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Multi-Model%20Ensembles%20for%20Climate%20Attribution

Description:

Attribution: ascribe to or regard as the effect of (a stated cause) (e.g., the ... In the context of the observed climate, 'attribution' refers to: can we relate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: wd0
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multi-Model%20Ensembles%20for%20Climate%20Attribution


1
Multi-Model Ensembles for Climate Attribution
  • Arun Kumar
  • Climate Prediction Center
  • NCEP/NOAA
  • Acknowledgements Bhaskar Jha Marty Hoerling
    Ming Ji OGP Participants in the Seasonal
    Diagnostics Consortium

2
What is Attribution?
  • Attribution ascribe to or regard as the effect
    of (a stated cause) (e.g., the delays were
    attributed to the heavy traffic).
  • In the context of the observed climate,
    attribution refers to can we relate observed
    climate anomalies to external forcing(s)?

3
  • Atmospheric anomalies ? Sea Surface Temperatures
    Soil Moisture OR a manifestation of variability
    internal to the atmosphere
  • Trends in the ocean-atmosphere system? changes in
    solar forcing aerosols CO2OR are intrinsic to
    the coupled system

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Why is Attribution Relevant?
  • Helps in understanding what the dominant forcing
    mechanisms controlling climate variability are
  • Provides an understanding of why climate is
    evolving the way it is
  • Provides a basis for making long-range
    predictions and projections

8
An Approach to Attribution Analysis
  • Analysis of observed anomalies (atmosphere,
    ocean, solar,)
  • Conceptual separation of system into internal and
    external (or forced and forcing) components
  • Formulation of hypothesis (e.g. such and such
    anomaly may be because of such and such forcing)
  • Testing the hypothesis involves analyzing
    response to the external forcing
  • Empirical approach
  • General circulation model approach

9
DJF 1997/98 200-mb Z
10
DJF 2001/02 200-mb Z
11
Problems with attribution based on a single AGCM
  • In the AGCM approach, attribution keys on the
    comparison of the observed anomalies with the
    AGCMs response to the external forcing
  • Is the AGCM response to an external forcing
    correct?

12
  • One possible solution is to
  • Use Multi-model approach as a confidence (or
    consensus) builder in documenting response to an
    external factor
  • Once a level of confidence could be placed in the
    atmospheric response to the external forcing,
    more definite statements about the causality of
    observed anomalies can be made

13
DJF 1997/98
14
DJF 2001/02
15
Seasonal Diagnostics Consortium
Model CCM3 NCEP NSIPP ECHAM4.5 (From IRI) GFDL
Type Spectral Spectral Grid Spectral Grid
Resolution T40L18 T62L64 2 Deg Lat/Lon T40L18 N45L18
of Simulations 20 18 9 24 10
Total of Simulations 81
16
2004 EOS
17
2004 EOS
  • Add the line plot

18
MM Climate Attribution
  • Other Application of MM attribution runs
  • Documenting atmospheric responses to boundary
    forcings
  • Inferring current state of climate
  • Analyzing successes and failures of operational
    SI forecasts
  • Generating different SI prediction scenarios
  • Model validation (has long been the implicit
    basis for various MIP activities)

19
Atmospheric Response to SST Forcing
20
(2000-2004) - (1961-90)
21
  • Atmospheric Climate Model Simulations
  • Observed SST Forcing
  • Institution Model Ensemble Size
  • GFDL AM-2 10
  • MPI/IRI ECHAM-4 24
  • NASA GMAO 23
  • Simulation production for 1950-2004
  • Specified monthly varying global SSTs
  • Climatological GHG/Aerosols
  • 57 member multi-model ensemble
  • Experiments are part of Seasonal
  • Climate Diagnostics Consortium
  • http//www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/produc
    ts/people/bjha/

22
(2000-2004) - (1961-90)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
  • Atmospheric Climate Model Simulations
  • Idealized Indian Ocean SST Forcing
  • Institution Model Ensemble Size
  • GFDL AM-2 10
  • NCEP GFS
    10
  • NCAR CCM3 10
  • NCAR CAM3 10
  • Transient 0.1C/yr Indian Ocean warming
  • Each run is 11-yrs in duration.
  • Climatological SSTs elsewhere.
  • Climatological GHG/Aerosols
  • 40 member multi-model ensemble
  • http//www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/asphilli/Results/Ram
    ped-IndianOcean/

26
(No Transcript)
27
Inferring Current State of Climate (consistent
with the external forcing)
28
Response Forced by the Observed SSTs
29
  • Coupled Ocn-Atm Climate Model Simulations
  • Observed GHG/Aerosol Forcing
  • Simulation production for 1895-2004
  • Specified monthly varying GHG/Aerosol
    1895-2000
  • A1B Scenario 2001-2004
  • 18 Different Coupled Models/47 total runs
  • Experiments are part of the IPCC AR-4 Suite
  • http//www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/a
    bout_ipcc.php

30
SSTs
Land Temp
31
(2000-2004) - (1961-90)
32
Validating Forecasts
33
NDJFM 2004/2005
34
Efforts in NOAA
  • What currently exists An informal activity
    maintaining monthly updates in AMIP runs forced
    by Global SSTs
  • Within NOAA, need to formalize attribution
    activity for different time scales could be
    centralized or a virtual activity
  • Such an activity can also support other model
    based hypothesis testing efforts (e.g., impact
    of different ocean basins causality of trends
    and droughts )

35
OBS
June 1998-May 2002 (The Perfect Oceans for
Drought)
MODEL
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com