Law and Ethics for Medical Careers 3rd Edition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Law and Ethics for Medical Careers 3rd Edition

Description:

In July 1993 the patient went to the hospital for delivery of her baby. ... delivery, she began to leak amniotic fluid and experienced pain from contractions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: sharon64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Law and Ethics for Medical Careers 3rd Edition


1
Law and Ethics for Medical Careers3rd Edition
  • Written Consent (6)
  • Emergency Medical Treatment and
  • Active Labor Act (8)

2
The Case
  • In July 1993 the patient went to the hospital for
    delivery of her baby. While being prepped for
    delivery, she began to leak amniotic fluid and
    experienced pain from contractions.

3
The Case, continued
  • The attending physicians decided to transfer the
    patient to another hospital for a delivery by
    cesarean section.
  • By the time the patient arrived at the transfer
    hospital, she was in severe distress and the baby
    was delivered spontaneously.

4
The Case, continued
  • Emergency surgery was needed to repair extensive
    vaginal lacerations caused by the delivery.
  • The patient survived the surgery but later
    developed complications.

5
What Do You Think?
  • What charges could the patient file against the
    referring hospital?
  • Do you think the referring hospital was
    negligent? Why or why not?

6
What Do You Think?
  • Who should have jurisdiction over hospital
    referral patterns?
    (For example the courts, the
    state board of medical examiners, the hospitals
    board of directors, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.)

7
The Trial
  • The patient brought action against the first
    hospital under the Emergency Medical Treatment
    and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The patient
    stated that the hospital had engaged in patient
    dumping.

8
The Trial, continued
  • In addition, the patient added a motion that
    would require the hospital to put policies in
    place that necessitate gaining written consent
    from a patient prior to any transfer to another
    facility.

9
The Decision
  • The court was not responsible for monitoring
    internal policies of the hospital to assure that
    they were in compliance with EMTALA.
  • The responsibility belonged to the executive
    branch of the state government that was empowered
    to discipline hospitals.

10
The Decision, continued
  • The executive branch of state governments could
    therefore issue fines for breaches of EMTALA.
  • In severe cases, suspensions from eligibility for
    Medicare and Medicaid could be issued.
  • Hart v. Riverside Hospital, Inc., 899 F. Sup. 264
    (D.C.., Va., Oct. 5, 1995).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com