Dementia in People with Intellectual Disability: diagnostic and management challenges PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 50
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dementia in People with Intellectual Disability: diagnostic and management challenges


1
Dementia in People with Intellectual Disability
diagnostic and management challenges
  • Chris Perkins
  • Psychiatrist
  • MHSOP and Dual Disability
  • BOPDHB

2
Longevity
  • UK Currently 12 of ID population aged gt65 by
    2040 expect it to be 25 (UK) (7)
  • 2 of population gt 65 will have ID
  • 1063 people with ID gt55 years in NZ in 1993 (Hand
    1995) numbers increasing
  • In 2003 half IHC users in Central Region gt55 (8)

3
Consequences of increased life-span
  • More disorders of old age mental and physical
    including dementia
  • Ageing parents no longer able to continue care at
    home
  • Need residential options suitable for retired
    people with ID
  • Older people with ID fall between disability
    and age-related stools in service provision

4
Down Syndrome
  • 44 live to gt 60 years
  • 14 gt 68 years (10)
  • Incidence of dementia in Down syndrome 15-40
    (1)
  • 30-35 years 3.4
  • 40-49 years 10.3
  • 50-59 years 40 (11)

5
Dementia in Down Syndrome
  • Extra Chromosome 21 ? extra gene for amyloid
    precursor protein ? people with DS secrete 1.5x
    amount of amyloid than non-DS
  • gt35 years all people with DS have classical
    plaques and tangles but not all get AD

6
Other causes ID
  • ? Incidence same as rest of population (2)
  • Making the diagnosis in person with ID

7
Who makes the diagnosis?
  • GPs dont feel confident
  • Psychiatrists dont want to see people with ID
  • (Psycho) geriatricians see some? (But lt65)
  • Dual disability providers?
  • (Often seems to be the support worker or manager
    of group home)

8
Why make the diagnosis?
  • For all the usual reasons
  • Education of person, family and support workers
  • Support e.g. via Alzheimers NZ
  • To access additional care (age-related)
  • Planning
  • Medication?

9
Response to medication (13)
10
And how?
  • Informant information caregivers, family
  • Physical and MSE
  • Check list?
  • Diagnostic criteria adapted to people with ID

11
DSM 4
  • Memory impairment
  • aphasia,
  • apraxia,
  • agnosia,
  • executive function
  • Decline in functioning
  • Not something else

12
Diagnostic Criteria DC-LD
  • Loss of memory, both short and long term
  • Cognitive decline especially loss of skills of
    judgment and understanding
  • Change in adaptive behaviour which is recognised
    by loss of skills in self care
  • Language difficulties, both of expressive
    language and comprehension

13
DC-LC
  • Apraxia
  • Agnosia
  • Excluded as criteria because of difficulty in
    measurement
  • (but are they more difficult to measure than
    memory?)

14
Neurological signs supportive of diagnosis
  • Frontal release signs
  • Epilepsy
  • Late onset seizures in DS (prevalence 82-84)
    (1)(3)
  • Depth perception?
  • Dysarthria, dysphasia, Parkinsonian features,
    spastic paresis of limbs, contractures in DS (3)

15
People with DS and dementia may show..
  • In early stages
  • General slowing
  • Personality change
  • Apathy and loss of motivation
  • More like frontal lobe dementia
  • Not the same degree of behavioural disturbance (
    but similar types?)

16
Differential Diagnosis
  • Depression may cause loss of cognitive skills
    and regression, (may be prodromal for dementia)
    Anxiety?... Phobic d/os 5.8
  • Delirium
  • Physical disorders (e.g. hypothyroidism in DS)
  • Sensory problems (cataracts and otosclerosis in
    DS)
  • Medication polypharmacy common

17
Problems making diagnosis
  • Lack of longitudinal history ? failure to
    recognise decline need to have informant who
    knows person gt6 mo
  • MMSE unhelpful? Repeated neuropsych. Testing
  • Diagnosing depression / physical problems e.g.
    more difficult if poor communication
  • But basically the same as people with normal IQ

18
Checklist of observed changes in older
people (IHC NZ Inc)
19
  • Service user
  • known for gt1 year
  • Useful info. for
  • assessors not to
  • formally diagnose an
  • individual

20
(No Transcript)
21
Referrals for ? dementia in person with ID
  • 9 referrals to MHSOP and DDS over last year.
    Underlying request is often for placement in
    residential care? questions
  • Are people with ID similar in age and interests
    even if they do have age-related disorder?
  • Are younger people with ID suitably placed in
    residential care with OP?
  • What about ageing in place?

22
Referrals to MHSOP and DDS
  • 3 no dementia
  • 2 delirium (? Underlying dementia)
  • 4 dementia ( 2 new diagnoses)
  • Referral source MHS 2, ID Sector 5. GP2

23
From MHS
  • 1. M 65 mild ID, schizophrenia and deterioration
    in mobility. No dementia Mental Health
    Residential Provider not able to manage poor
    mobility. Geriatric assessment, OT, placed in RH
  • Problem was really MH providers reluctance to
    adapt to persons physical needs

24
From MHS
  • 2. M 45 No dementia family history of AD,
    cerebral atrophy on CT brain no history
    suggestive of dementia (or of current mental
    illness). Long-term challenging behaviour .
    Placed with ID provider who may or may not manage
    behaviour
  • Main issue lack of suitable ID beds for people
    with behaviour challenges in BOP .

25
From ID Provider (5)
  • 1.M. 61 delirium (underlying dementia DS) needed
    Rx for UTI, also anxiety. Group home couldnt
    manage (respite, additional staff unavailable due
    to funding issues) transferred permanently to RH
  • Issue lack of flexibility to provide a temporary
    increase in care

26
From ID residential provider
  • 2.M 43 recurrent chest infections, delirium,
    possible dementia house has no daytime staff
    Resident still had to go out when ill. May be
    transferred to retirees home when bed
    available.
  • Problem Lack of daytime support staff, lack of
    accommodation for people who can no longer attend
    work

27
From ID residential provider
  • 3. M 58DementiaLiving in group home, up at
    night. T/F to RH with mother (who has AD)
    Behavioural difficulties? St III ? picked on by
    other residents and deteriorating mobility ?
    Hospital level care. Rapid course of illness
  • Multiple moves. Would be better in
    psychogeriatric hospital care, but no beds

28
From ID residential provider
  • 4. F 48 probable dementia, many years
    institutionalised very disabled, blind, mute,
    resistive DS developed epilepsy, difficult to
    get history, possible decrease in skills.
  • Disagreement between management and care staff
    about history and whether she could be adequately
    cared for in group home.
  • Moderate ID, dependency and perceptual problems
    made diagnosis difficult

29
From ID residential provider
  • 5. M 58 dementia difficult behaviour, no
    overnight staff,
  • Staff felt they could cope mangers wanted him in
    Stage 111
  • Where is he now?

30
From GP (1)
  • 1. F 45 dementia
  • DS lives with ageing mother, sister supportive
    (WG / PM) explicitly looking for L-T placement?
    ID house for older people
  • Good history, caring family, making decisions for
    future

31
From GP
  • 2. M 62 Lives in RH Spec. endorsement
    cyproterone. Our decision to assess moderately
    severe ID very limited range of activities, but
    no clear deterioration. Probably no dementia. No
    change in management
  • Institutionalised long-term, no family, no
    advocate, impoverished life?

32
Issues for our clients
  • Variable quality of information available at
    group home
  • Limited function and communication,
    institutionalisation and perceptual problems make
    diagnosis difficult
  • No family for history and decision-making
  • Mangers see things differently from support
    workers
  • Adult MHS get desperate for placement for people
    with ID!
  • Behaviour problems seemed similar to people with
    pre-morbid normal IQ

33
Issues continued
  • Lack of suitable ID beds for people with
    behaviour challenges
  • Difficulty providing a temporary increase in care
  • Lack of daytime support staff
  • Lack of specific accommodation for older people
  • Multiple changes in accommodation

34
Group Homes
  • Maximum number of residents 5
  • Houses are small. If one resident is disruptive
    it is hard to get away (c.f. with RH)
  • Staffing at night nil, sleep-over, wake-over
    . If wake-over expected to be working? disturbs
    residents

35
Group Homes
  • Group homes may not have daytime staff they are
    geared for working age population (There is 1
    group home for OP, not necessarily with dementia,
    in Tauranga)
  • Group homes cant (or dont) readily access
    additional help if residents frail or ill
  • Funding comes via MOH directly. Some DHB services
    not available

36
ID residential providers cant directly access
  • District nursing
  • Ancillary services e.g. OT, dietitian, physio.
  • Personal cares (per NASC)
  • 28/7 residential respite
  • Dementia daycare
  • These are available to PWD and ID living in own
    home.
  • ID provider can pay for services and then get
    reimbursed from MOH and can get client reassessed
    to allow for increased levels of staffing in house

37
Cant provide for people with dementia
  • Who wander, especially at night
  • Are terminal, frail, medically ill, need hospital
    level care
  • (Similar to other people with dementia)

38
Service issues
  • Historically in US (and NZ) more interest in
    children See MOH 2001 The Clinical Assessment
    and Management of Children, Young people and
    Adults with Down Syndrome 4/69 pages devoted to
    adults)
  • Conflict over responsibility for PWD- ageing or
    ID services?
  • Who is primary client--person with ID, ageing
    parent, family or ID service provider?
  • What is and appropriate service model in home
    care? Specific facilities? Generic dementia
    services? How to plan for transition? (4)

39
Health of Older People Strategy 2002
  • services need to develop to support ageing in
    place offering people the opportunity to
    continue to live safely in their community.
  • This includes. Ongoing support for those who
    are disabled.

40
The Clinical Assessment and Management of
Children, Young people and Adults with Down
Syndrome (MOH 2001) re Alzheimers Disease
  • All efforts should be made to maintain the
    person in their current accommodation and
    occupational settings (with appropriate
    modifications) before moving to more suitable
    accommodation. Involvement of geriatric services
    and contact with specialised support services
    should occur (p 28-29)

41
Assessment process for Older People MOH Oct 2003
  • Acknowledges increasing numbers of older people
    with ID
  • Suggests assessors have specialist training in
    the ID area and support from specialists with
    expertise in the disability field

42
WHO Ageing and Intellectual Disabilities_
Improving Longevity and Promoting Healthy Ageing
  • National policies should recognise the
    contribution of adults with ID to the greater
    population, and where appropriate specialised
    services and assistance should be provided, and
    equitable access to generic services should be
    ensured
  • p 20

43
Residential Circumstances Of Older (55)
Australians with Intellectual Disability
44
Edinburgh Principles for people with ID and
dementia (5)
  • Promote utmost QOL base services on
    person-centred approach
  • Individual strengths, capabilities, skills and
    wishes should be overriding consideration in
    decision-making
  • Involve individual and family in all phases of
    assessment, service planning and provision
  • Ensure appropriate diagnostic, assessment and
    intervention services available

45
Edinburgh Principles
  • 5. Plan and provide supports and services that
    optimise remaining in chosen home and community
  • 6. Ensure same access to services and supports as
    those in general population affected by dementia
  • 7.Ensure generic, cooperative and proactive
    strategic planning

46
The words are right
  • Where to from here?

47
Recommendations (5)
  • Need trained personnel to do diagnostic work-up /
    standardised assessment instrument
  • ID Carers need to be upskilled
  • Bring providers together / avoid thinking
    compartmentally ID /or geriatric services
    responsible?
  • Register of people with ID and dementia for
    planning

48
Recommendations
  • Staffing / funding for increased levels care
  • Maintain community supports
  • Advocacy / political activism
  • Research evaluation of care models
  • Examine conflicts around differing philosophies
  • Prevention

49
Summary
  • People with ID are living long enough to develop
    dementia
  • Diagnosis similar to that for other people,
    though some challenges
  • Current ID residential care is often not suitable
    for people with dementia
  • We need to support ageing in place for people
    with ID and dementia

50
References
  • Prasher Corbett 1993
  • Janicki Dalton 2000
  • Lai and Williams 1989
  • McCallion Janicki 1997
  • Wilkinson and Janicki 2002
  • WHO Ageing and Intellectual disabilities WHO/
    MSD/HPS/MDP/00.3
  • Davidson, Prasher Janicki (2003) P2.
  • Webb Rogers (2002)
  • Hand Reid (1996)
  • Chicione and McGuire (1997)
  • MOH 2001
  • Holland et al (1998)
  • Torr J (2006)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com