London Array 1000 MW London Array The Locomotive of UK Round 2

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

London Array 1000 MW London Array The Locomotive of UK Round 2

Description:

London Array 1000 MW London Array The Locomotive of UK Round 2 –

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: pet9251
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: London Array 1000 MW London Array The Locomotive of UK Round 2


1
London Array1000 MW London Array The
Locomotive of UK Round 2
  • Presentation to
  • ewec, 2006 Athens
  • by Svend Richmann Jensen/ENERGI E2
  • 1st March 2006

2
Consortium Investors
  • E.On Renewables is one of the UKs leading wind
    farm owner-operator-developers
  • Shell WindEnergy is the one of the top ten
    largest windfarm asset owners in the world and is
    actively expanding its windfarm business across
    Europe and the USA
  • CORE is a joint venture between Farm Energy (the
    originator of the project) and ENERGI E2 of
    Copenhagen (owner of 460MW windpower incl. Nysted
    Offshore Wind Farm).

3
UK Offshore Wind Farm Sites
4
Project Details
  • Capacity 1000MW
  • Up to 271 turbines
  • 245 km2
  • Long Sand and Kentish Knock sandbanks
  • 650m by 1000m spacing
  • Water depth 0 25m
  • More than 20km from coast
  • Supply to 750,000 UK households
  • Cable landfall in Swale Estuary
  • Grid connection under existing lines

5
Current Programme
  • 2003 Dec - Crown Estate agreement for lease
  • 2005 June applications submitted
  • 2006 Feb Grid connection Final Sums Liability
  • 2006 July Consents received
  • 2006 Tenders to be submitted
  • 2007 First financial investment decision
  • 2009 Start of construction
  • 2010 Oct 2010 London Array goes live

6
Consenting Route
  • Offshore wind farm
  • Electricity Act 1989/Energy Act 2004, Section 36
  • Food Environmental Protection Act 1985, Section
    5
  • Coastal Protection Act 1949, Section 34
  • Onshore line works
  • Electricity Act 1989, Section 37
  • Onshore sub-station
  • TC Planning Act 1990, Section 57

7
Key Consenting Issues
  • Open, sensitive and innovative approach essential
    to ensure success
  • Red throated diver
  • English Nature
  • JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee)
  • RSPB (Royal Society for Protection of Birds)
  • Fisheries
  • Fisheries committees
  • Fishing communities
  • Shell fisheries
  • Navigation/Radar
  • PLA (Port of London Authority)
  • MCA (Maritime and Coastguard Agency)
  • Trinity House
  • Cable Landfall/Onshore Sub-station
  • Graveney with Goodnestone Parish Council

8
Red Throated Diver
  • Displacement Will the birds habituate to the
    windfarm structures and if not, what ecological
    impact arises?
  • Collision not the issue

9
Red Throated Diver
GB population estimate 4,850 Based on aerial
surveys JNCC now estimate 11,000 Red-Throated
Divers in Greater Thames Estuary Constructive
dialogue with English Nature and RSPB
10
Navigation, Shipping Lanes
  • Barrow Deep 12 vessels/day
  • Black Deep 13 vessels/day
  • Fishermans Gat 7 vessels/day
  • Princes Channel 48 ships/day

11
Marine Radar
  • Navigation Radar concerns at Fishermans Gat
    precautionary area

12
Offshore site, Indicative design
13
Offshore site, Indicative design
14
Metmast
80 metre high Installed September 2004
15
Geotechnical investigations
16
Foundations, deep water
HAT 30.4m MSL 27.7m LAT 25.0m
D 5.75m L 61m W 480 ton t 65mm
Tp 216 ton
D lt 21m W lt 1800 ton W ballast 1800 ton
17
Offshore substation
18
Array cabling
60 km 185 mm2 Cu 15 km 800 mm2 Cu
19
Export cable
52 km 220 or 132 kV 630 mm2 Cu
5 m LAT
20
Land fall
21
Land fall, sea defense wall
22
Cable route
23
Cleve Hill farm
24
Onshore Sub-station at Cleve Hill
  • Visual impact minimised
  • Cut into hill
  • Masked by bunding and planting
  • Connects to National Grid at
    400kV
  • No new towers or lines

25
Summary
  • Up to now we have avoided unreasonable demands
    regarding f.ex. Burial depth, burial method,
    restricted size of turbines, construction
    methods.
  • This has been achieved by a close collaboration
    between planning and engineering teams to find
    solutions that are environmental, technical and
    economically viable
  • Unfortunately we have not been able to get a
    agreement regarding grid connection and therefore
    the project is going to halt now and wait until
    2012 before it can go live.
  • Hopefully the wind turbine prices have fallen to
    a more reasonable level at that time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com