Peter Bk, LM Glasfiber pbklmglasfiber'com - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Peter Bk, LM Glasfiber pbklmglasfiber'com

Description:

The transition point is driving the frictional drag of the airfoil. ... It is especially challenging near the airfoil's design conditions! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: peter568
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peter Bk, LM Glasfiber pbklmglasfiber'com


1
Experimental Detection of Transition on Wind
Turbine Airfoils
  • Peter Bæk, LM Glasfiber
    pbk_at_lmglasfiber.com

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Experimental Setup
  • Results
  • Conclusions

3
Transition Facts
Natural Transtion
  • Post-transitional boundary layer is characterized
    by
  • Increased boundary layer thickness
  • Increased velocity fluctuations
  • Increased skin friction

Increased Heat Transfer
4
Why do we want to measure transition?
  • The transition point is driving the frictional
    drag of the airfoil. - Premature transition can
    reduce annual energy production up to 2!
  • The transition point influences separation and
    maximum lift. - Premature separation will reduce
    annual energy production even more!
  • Transition cannot be computed accurately enough.
    - It is especially challenging near the
    airfoils design conditions!
  • It is necessary to ensure high quality drag
    measurements of airfoils. - Surface
    imperfections on models can be eliminated.

1978 2009From technology pioneering to
global industrial excellence
5
Measurement Setup
IR Camera
Heat Lamp
Quartz Glass
View Port
Gold Markers
6
Measurement Concept
Transition Point
Heat Lamp
Heat Lamp
Convection Turbulent
Convection Laminar
Radiation
Radiation
Internal Conduction
Internal Conduction
7
LM Glasfibers Wind Tunnel
  • Max wind speed 105 m/s
  • Reynolds number 6 millions
  • Turbulence intensity 0.1

8
Thermographic Image Analysis
Transition Line
NACA0015, AOA0 deg, Re6 Mill.
Flow
9
Measurements vs. Xfoil, NACA 0015 airfoil.
NACA 0015
10 higher drag!
10
Verification using stethoscope
Tubes to microphones
Good correspondance!
11
Measurements vs. Xfoil Wind Turbine Airfoils
18
25
Good
Bad!10 off
12
Measurements vs. Xfoil Root Airfoil
40
LSWT
Re 3 x 106
XFOIL, ncr7
Bad!
Good
13
Summary of the new method
  • Method was shown to be non-intrusive
  • Method was verified using microphones
  • High order of repeatability. Variance less than
    2 of chord length
  • The technique is fast and reliable!

Well suited for an industrial setup!
14
Conclusions
  • Overall agreement between measurements and XFOIL
    transition model was good.
  • But pitfalls exist!
  • Measured and predicted are not always the same!
  • Correct prediction of transition does not lead to
    correct maximum lift!
  • Possibility to study low level flow details of
    airfoil flow control devices.
  • The new method ensures a reliable design basis
    for our products!

15
Questions ?
  • Thank you for your attention!
  • Peter Bæk
  • pbk_at_lmglasfiber.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com