Title: Nordic model
1Nordic model prospects and challenges
- Torben M. Andersen
- University of Aarhus
- CEPR, CESifo and IZA
2Nordic model Achievements
Tax burden 25 vs 50
3Nordic model main characteristics
- Universal individual rights, collective
financing - Social safety net decent standard of living
- Welfare services satisfy the needs of most - NOT
a residual - a large tax financed public sector
4Average age dependent net-contributions The
social contract
1.000 euros
5The social contract in Sweden
200000
100000
0
0--5
10--15
20--25
30--35
40--45
50--55
60--65
70--75
80--85
90--95
-100000
-200000
-300000
-400000
-500000
1930-1934
1950-1954
1970-1974
1990-1994
2010-2014
6Employment focused model
- No self-support entitlement to some income
transfer - In work higher income and therefore higher tax
payments - The financial balance of the model requires a
high labour force participation!
7Labour force participation by ageFinland, OECD
max and min
8An implicit insurance contract
- Welfare arrangements a large implicit insurance
contract (collective risk sharing) - Conditionalities (health, abilities, luck etc)
determine both the use of and contributions to
the welfare state - Direct welfare effect conducive for
flexibility/adjustment
9Challenge I Ageing
Total and old age dependency ratios 1940-2040
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1940
1946
1952
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
2018
2024
2030
2036
10Primary balance projection 2010-2050
1
0
2010
2013
2016
2019
2022
2025
2028
2031
2034
2037
2040
2043
2046
2049
-1
For given arrangements not including any new
initiatives
-2
of GDP
-3
-4
-5
11Non-Solutions
- More children too late. and they can expect a
high longevity - Immigration in need of some who are willing to
pay some taxes! - Growing the pie more wealth but who are not
going to have their share ? - The ageing problem is a distribution problem,
not a problem of lack of resources!!!
12Solutions ?
- Expenditure cuts a change of the welfare model
- Tax increases likely to be costly given the
already high taxes globalization - Increase employment more tax revenue, less
expenditures on transfers
13Challenges II Services
- How to maintain a satisfactory level and quality
of welfare services? - For some core activities it is very difficult to
increase productivity human relations are
involved
14Higher living standard increased demand for
services
- Increased material well-being basic needs are
satisfied - Increased focus and demand for services, e.g.
health - New possibilities new demands
15Public finances systematic deficitsprimary
balance in of GDP
1,0
0,0
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
2042
2044
2046
2048
2050
-1,0
-2,0
A Higher productivity growth 0,5 pa
-3,0
Baseline Pure demographics
-4,0
-5,0
B A welfare service growth 0,25 pa
-6,0
16Challenge III GlobalizationGlobalization
paradox?
- Support for globalization is very strong (or less
strong lobbying for protectionism) - Welfare model - most threatened by globalization?
- Nordic countries have always been open and the
welfare state has been developed alongside
openness
17Globalization and taxation
- Tax base mobility difficult to tax highly
mobile tax bases - Most tax revenue accrue from direct and indirect
taxation of labour income - Need for tax reform, but not a major problem if
employment rates can be kept high
18Globalization - employment
- Globalization technology skill-bias
- Education becomes increasingly important
- Not only for the elite but for distributional
reasons (to prevent a large supply of unskilled)
19Migration and the welfare state
- Immigrants from low income countries low
qualifications - High unemployment risk qualification gap is
large - High risk of transfer-dependency
Qualifications
Wage
Social safety net
20Employment gap for immigrants from low income
countries
21Policy challenges
- How to ensure a high employment rate
- Ageing/Longevity
- Skill-bias/Qualifications
- Services satisfactory supply
- Migration how to square the model with open
borders