Military Equipment Valuation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Military Equipment Valuation

Description:

... for sale ... Examples include: combat aircraft, pods, combat ships, support ... based business rules and valuation methodology for military equipment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: OUS694

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Military Equipment Valuation


1
Military Equipment Valuation
Society of Logistics Engineers Southern Maryland
Mark E. Hogenmilller Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and
Logistics) Property Equipment Policy
Office November 30, 2006
2
Presentation Roadmap
  • What Is Military Equipment Valuation (MEV)?
  • Why Is Military Equipment Valuation Necessary?
  • What was the Initial Goal and Required Actions?
  • How Do We Move Forward?
  • How Does IUID and Other Efforts Support MEV?

3
MEV Defined
  • MEV is an effort to implement the 2003 Federal
    Accounting Standard that requires military
    equipment (including modifications and upgrades)
    to be valued, capitalized, depreciated, properly
    accounted for, and reported on the Departments
    financial statements

Slide 3
4
Military Equipment Definition
  • Military Equipment is defined as Tangible assets
    that
  • Have an estimated useful life of 2 or more years
  • Are not intended for sale
  • Does not ordinarily lose its identity or become a
    component part of another article, and
  • Are intended to be used or available for use in
    the performance of military missions
  • Examples include combat aircraft, pods, combat
    ships, support ships, satellites, and combat
    vehicles

Slide 4
5
Asset Taxonomy
PPEProperty, Plant and Equipment OMSOperating
Material and Supplies
6
Better Information
  • MEV will provide more reliable and more accurate
    information to decision makers
  • Total acquisition cost of assets will be
    consistently determined
  • Decision makers will get comparable information
    over time and between programs
  • It will allow better investment planning for
    replacements

7
Public Trust
  • MEV will reinforce public trust and confidence in
    our ability to allocate mission funding
  • Public Perception matters because taxpayers fund
    our infrastructure
  • A good perception leads to public confidence in
    our ability to protect the nation
  • Public confidence leads to trust that we are
    using taxpayer money prudently
  • We owe the taxpayers no less than a private
    company would to its investors in being able to
    account for their money. Linda M. Springer, OMB

8
Its the Law
  • MEV allows us to comply with the Chief Financial
    Officers Act of 1990
  • Not later than March 31 of 1992 and each year
    thereafter, the head of each executive agency
    shall prepare and submit to the Director of the
    Office of Management and Budget a financial
    statement for the preceding fiscal year .
    (Pub.L. 101-576, Section 303(a))

9
Its the Law (cont.)
  • MEV also allows us to comply with the Federal
    Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996
  • Each agency shall implement and maintain
    financial management systems that comply
    substantially with Federal financial management
    systems requirements, applicable Federal
    accounting standards, and the United States
    Government Standard General Ledger at the
    transaction level. (Pub. L. 104-208, Section
    803(a))

10
Federal Accounting Standards
  • MEV complies with Statement of Federal Financial
    Accounting Standards (SFFAS) applicable to
    Military Equipment
  • SFFAS No. 6 Accounting for Property, Plant, and
    Equipment June 1996
  • Accounting standards for Federally owned
    property, plant, and equipment
  • National Defense Property, Plant, and Equipment
    (ND PPE) excluded (Military Equipment)
  • These assets are developed, used, and retired
    in a manner that does not lend itself to
    systematic and rational assignment of costs to
    accounting periods (i.e., depreciation
    accounting) and, ultimately, to outputs.

11
Federal Accounting Standards (cont.)
  • SFFAS No. 23 Eliminating the Category National
    Defense Property, Plant, and Equipment May 2003
  • Rescind the term ND PPE
  • Classify all assets previously considered ND PPE
    as general PPE
  • The provisions of Standard No. 6 now apply to
    Military Equipment

12
Initial Goal of MEV
Establish an auditable Military Equipment
Baseline by end of FY06
Slide 12
13
Required Actions
  • Establish Polices, Procedures, and Guidance
  • Standardize the valuation and accounting
    treatment for military equipment
  • Complete Initial Valuations of Military Equipment
  • 600 military equipment acquisition programs
  • Deploy System Capability
  • Maintain and update values

14
Completed Actions
  • Developed ten principle-based business rules and
    valuation methodology for military equipment
  • A collaborative effort between the PE Policy
    Office, Military Departments, applicable Defense
    Agencies, and Office of the Under Secretary of
    Defense (Comptroller) (OUSD (C))
  • Standardize valuation process by determining the
    accounting treatments for military equipment
    assets

Slide 14
15
Completed Actions (cont.)
  • Completed Initial Review of approximately 1,100
    Military Equipment Programs
  • Received assistance from Program Management
    Offices
  • Identified initial military equipment program
    listings
  • Determined if program should be valued or issued
    a permanent or temporary waiver

Slide 15
16
Completed Actions (cont.)
  • Established a historical cost baseline of 600
    actively procuring DoD major weapons systems
    (9/30/06)
  • Includes Army, Navy, AF, SOCOM, ChemBio, and MDA
  • Represents several thousand major end items worth
    an estimated 600 billion of military equipment
    owned and operated by the DoD
  • Using a program-based methodology where average
    end item cost is based on program expenditures,
    budgetary data, and asset quantities (as
    permitted by SFFAS No. 23)

Slide 16
17
Completed Actions (cont.)
  • Developed and deployed Capital Asset Management
    System (CAMS-ME), an enterprise-wide capability
    to perform Financial Asset Accounting
  • Values, capitalizes, and depreciates delivered
    assets
  • Captures asset additions, transfers, and
    retirement data
  • Captures expenditures by program from accounting
    systems via DFAS Business Enterprise Information
    Services (BEIS) System
  • Reports financial and management data

Slide 17
18
Completed Actions (cont.)
  • Developed a Management Assertion and audit
    readiness process to handle the uniqueness of
    military equipment for making the values audit
    ready
  • Management Assertion is a formal statement
    provided by the financial head of a Component
    stating that the initial military equipment
    program values are ready for audit
  • It is supported by a system of internal controls
    that demonstrates that the data DoD has collected
    support the program values that are being reported

Slide 18
19
The Department of Defense will assert to 5 things
  • Valuation (OUSD ATL PE Policy Office)
  • That the items have been valued in accordance
    with Federal Accounting Standards or Generally
    Acceptable Accounting Standards
  • Completeness (Component Acquisition)
  • Regarding the PPE line item on the balance
    sheet, that everything that should be reported
    has been recorded and reported
  • Rights and Obligations (Component Acquisition)
  • That the Component reporting the item does in
    fact have the rights and owns the equipment
  • Existence (Component Acquisition and/or
    Logistics)
  • That the military equipment reported by the DoD
    does in fact exist and there is physical evidence
    of its existence
  • Presentation and Disclosure (Component Financial
    Management)
  • That the information is presented accurately on
    the financial statement

Slide 19
20
The Department of Defense will assert to 5 things
  • Valuation (OUSD ATL PE Policy Office)
  • That the items have been valued in accordance
    with Federal Accounting Standards or Generally
    Acceptable Accounting Standards
  • Completeness (Component Acquisition)
  • Regarding the PPE line item on the balance
    sheet, that everything that should be reported
    has been recorded and reported
  • Rights and Obligations (Component Acquisition)
  • That the Component reporting the item does in
    fact have the rights and owns the equipment
  • Existence (Component Acquisition and/or
    Logistics)
  • That the military equipment reported by the DoD
    does in fact exist and there is physical evidence
    of its existence
  • Presentation and Disclosure (Component Financial
    Management)
  • That the information is presented accurately on
    the financial statement

Slide 20
21
Moving Forward
  • In order to move to full compliance with Standard
    6 we need move away from program based
    valuations to obtain a more detailed value
  • Full cost asset valuation
  • Asset value includes the cost of embedded GFP
  • Capability to identify and capitalize
    modification costs
  • Granular cost asset valuation
  • Asset costs exclude the cost of expensed items
    and other capital assets (e.g., support
    equipment)
  • Identify and track each asset
  • Better visibility by item (Group and composite is
    not allowed)
  • To be Fully automated

22
IUID Other Efforts Support MEV
  • Increased System Capabilities
  • Business Enterprise Information Services (BEIS)
  • DFAS data warehouse--automates program / end item
    expenditure updates
  • Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF)
  • Automates receipt and acceptance
  • Automates the tying of GFM cost to an end item in
    the military equipment valuation process
  • IUID Registry information will be provided to
    CAMS-ME for military equipment

Slide 22
23
IUID Other Efforts Support MEV (Cont.)
  • Services Accountability Systems
  • Automates the update of end item additions,
    transfers, and disposals
  • Provides information to the IUID Registry
  • IUID Registry provides information to CAMS-ME
  • IUID Registry will provide the audit trail of
    property in accountability systems

Slide 23
24
Embedded Elements
  • APUID Acquisition Program UID
  • Ties Expenditures to Acquisition Program and
    identifies Appropriate Work In Process (WIP)
    Account
  • Asset Type
  • Identifies Military Equipment as appropriate
  • IUID Item UID
  • Provides relationship to delivered Military
    Equipment Items
  • Relieving of WIP
  • Establishment of Fixed Asset and Deprecation
  • Identifies embedded Government Furnished Material
    (GFM)

25
General questions and info
The MEVA website http//www.acq.osd.mil/me/
26
  • Backup Slides

27
CAMS-ME Increment 1
Increment 1 (Avg. Cost System SFFAS 23
Compliant)
Portal
28
CAMS-ME Increment 2
APUID Registry
Expenditure data
DUID Registry
BEIS
Program Data
Asset Type
Financial Reporting
CAMS-ME
DDRS
Work in Process (WIP)
IUID Registry
WAWF
Valuation Data Acquisition Cost / GFM
Military Equipment Valuation (MEV)
DUID/APUID Filter
Asset Data Placed in Service Transfers/Retirements
/Losses
Fixed Asset Accounting (FAA)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)