Title: Military Equipment Valuation
1Military Equipment Valuation
Society of Logistics Engineers Southern Maryland
Mark E. Hogenmilller Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and
Logistics) Property Equipment Policy
Office November 30, 2006
2Presentation Roadmap
- What Is Military Equipment Valuation (MEV)?
- Why Is Military Equipment Valuation Necessary?
- What was the Initial Goal and Required Actions?
- How Do We Move Forward?
- How Does IUID and Other Efforts Support MEV?
3MEV Defined
- MEV is an effort to implement the 2003 Federal
Accounting Standard that requires military
equipment (including modifications and upgrades)
to be valued, capitalized, depreciated, properly
accounted for, and reported on the Departments
financial statements
Slide 3
4Military Equipment Definition
- Military Equipment is defined as Tangible assets
that - Have an estimated useful life of 2 or more years
- Are not intended for sale
- Does not ordinarily lose its identity or become a
component part of another article, and - Are intended to be used or available for use in
the performance of military missions - Examples include combat aircraft, pods, combat
ships, support ships, satellites, and combat
vehicles
Slide 4
5Asset Taxonomy
PPEProperty, Plant and Equipment OMSOperating
Material and Supplies
6Better Information
- MEV will provide more reliable and more accurate
information to decision makers - Total acquisition cost of assets will be
consistently determined - Decision makers will get comparable information
over time and between programs - It will allow better investment planning for
replacements
7Public Trust
- MEV will reinforce public trust and confidence in
our ability to allocate mission funding - Public Perception matters because taxpayers fund
our infrastructure - A good perception leads to public confidence in
our ability to protect the nation - Public confidence leads to trust that we are
using taxpayer money prudently - We owe the taxpayers no less than a private
company would to its investors in being able to
account for their money. Linda M. Springer, OMB
8Its the Law
- MEV allows us to comply with the Chief Financial
Officers Act of 1990 - Not later than March 31 of 1992 and each year
thereafter, the head of each executive agency
shall prepare and submit to the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget a financial
statement for the preceding fiscal year .
(Pub.L. 101-576, Section 303(a))
9Its the Law (cont.)
- MEV also allows us to comply with the Federal
Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996 - Each agency shall implement and maintain
financial management systems that comply
substantially with Federal financial management
systems requirements, applicable Federal
accounting standards, and the United States
Government Standard General Ledger at the
transaction level. (Pub. L. 104-208, Section
803(a))
10Federal Accounting Standards
- MEV complies with Statement of Federal Financial
Accounting Standards (SFFAS) applicable to
Military Equipment - SFFAS No. 6 Accounting for Property, Plant, and
Equipment June 1996 - Accounting standards for Federally owned
property, plant, and equipment - National Defense Property, Plant, and Equipment
(ND PPE) excluded (Military Equipment) - These assets are developed, used, and retired
in a manner that does not lend itself to
systematic and rational assignment of costs to
accounting periods (i.e., depreciation
accounting) and, ultimately, to outputs.
11Federal Accounting Standards (cont.)
- SFFAS No. 23 Eliminating the Category National
Defense Property, Plant, and Equipment May 2003 - Rescind the term ND PPE
- Classify all assets previously considered ND PPE
as general PPE - The provisions of Standard No. 6 now apply to
Military Equipment
12Initial Goal of MEV
Establish an auditable Military Equipment
Baseline by end of FY06
Slide 12
13Required Actions
- Establish Polices, Procedures, and Guidance
- Standardize the valuation and accounting
treatment for military equipment - Complete Initial Valuations of Military Equipment
- 600 military equipment acquisition programs
- Deploy System Capability
- Maintain and update values
14Completed Actions
- Developed ten principle-based business rules and
valuation methodology for military equipment - A collaborative effort between the PE Policy
Office, Military Departments, applicable Defense
Agencies, and Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller) (OUSD (C)) - Standardize valuation process by determining the
accounting treatments for military equipment
assets
Slide 14
15Completed Actions (cont.)
- Completed Initial Review of approximately 1,100
Military Equipment Programs - Received assistance from Program Management
Offices - Identified initial military equipment program
listings - Determined if program should be valued or issued
a permanent or temporary waiver
Slide 15
16Completed Actions (cont.)
- Established a historical cost baseline of 600
actively procuring DoD major weapons systems
(9/30/06) - Includes Army, Navy, AF, SOCOM, ChemBio, and MDA
- Represents several thousand major end items worth
an estimated 600 billion of military equipment
owned and operated by the DoD - Using a program-based methodology where average
end item cost is based on program expenditures,
budgetary data, and asset quantities (as
permitted by SFFAS No. 23)
Slide 16
17Completed Actions (cont.)
- Developed and deployed Capital Asset Management
System (CAMS-ME), an enterprise-wide capability
to perform Financial Asset Accounting - Values, capitalizes, and depreciates delivered
assets - Captures asset additions, transfers, and
retirement data - Captures expenditures by program from accounting
systems via DFAS Business Enterprise Information
Services (BEIS) System - Reports financial and management data
Slide 17
18Completed Actions (cont.)
- Developed a Management Assertion and audit
readiness process to handle the uniqueness of
military equipment for making the values audit
ready - Management Assertion is a formal statement
provided by the financial head of a Component
stating that the initial military equipment
program values are ready for audit - It is supported by a system of internal controls
that demonstrates that the data DoD has collected
support the program values that are being reported
Slide 18
19The Department of Defense will assert to 5 things
- Valuation (OUSD ATL PE Policy Office)
- That the items have been valued in accordance
with Federal Accounting Standards or Generally
Acceptable Accounting Standards - Completeness (Component Acquisition)
- Regarding the PPE line item on the balance
sheet, that everything that should be reported
has been recorded and reported - Rights and Obligations (Component Acquisition)
- That the Component reporting the item does in
fact have the rights and owns the equipment - Existence (Component Acquisition and/or
Logistics) - That the military equipment reported by the DoD
does in fact exist and there is physical evidence
of its existence - Presentation and Disclosure (Component Financial
Management) - That the information is presented accurately on
the financial statement
Slide 19
20The Department of Defense will assert to 5 things
- Valuation (OUSD ATL PE Policy Office)
- That the items have been valued in accordance
with Federal Accounting Standards or Generally
Acceptable Accounting Standards - Completeness (Component Acquisition)
- Regarding the PPE line item on the balance
sheet, that everything that should be reported
has been recorded and reported - Rights and Obligations (Component Acquisition)
- That the Component reporting the item does in
fact have the rights and owns the equipment - Existence (Component Acquisition and/or
Logistics) - That the military equipment reported by the DoD
does in fact exist and there is physical evidence
of its existence - Presentation and Disclosure (Component Financial
Management) - That the information is presented accurately on
the financial statement
Slide 20
21Moving Forward
- In order to move to full compliance with Standard
6 we need move away from program based
valuations to obtain a more detailed value - Full cost asset valuation
- Asset value includes the cost of embedded GFP
- Capability to identify and capitalize
modification costs - Granular cost asset valuation
- Asset costs exclude the cost of expensed items
and other capital assets (e.g., support
equipment) - Identify and track each asset
- Better visibility by item (Group and composite is
not allowed) - To be Fully automated
22IUID Other Efforts Support MEV
- Increased System Capabilities
- Business Enterprise Information Services (BEIS)
- DFAS data warehouse--automates program / end item
expenditure updates - Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF)
- Automates receipt and acceptance
- Automates the tying of GFM cost to an end item in
the military equipment valuation process - IUID Registry information will be provided to
CAMS-ME for military equipment
Slide 22
23IUID Other Efforts Support MEV (Cont.)
- Services Accountability Systems
- Automates the update of end item additions,
transfers, and disposals - Provides information to the IUID Registry
- IUID Registry provides information to CAMS-ME
- IUID Registry will provide the audit trail of
property in accountability systems
Slide 23
24Embedded Elements
- APUID Acquisition Program UID
- Ties Expenditures to Acquisition Program and
identifies Appropriate Work In Process (WIP)
Account - Asset Type
- Identifies Military Equipment as appropriate
- IUID Item UID
- Provides relationship to delivered Military
Equipment Items - Relieving of WIP
- Establishment of Fixed Asset and Deprecation
- Identifies embedded Government Furnished Material
(GFM)
25General questions and info
The MEVA website http//www.acq.osd.mil/me/
26 27CAMS-ME Increment 1
Increment 1 (Avg. Cost System SFFAS 23
Compliant)
Portal
28CAMS-ME Increment 2
APUID Registry
Expenditure data
DUID Registry
BEIS
Program Data
Asset Type
Financial Reporting
CAMS-ME
DDRS
Work in Process (WIP)
IUID Registry
WAWF
Valuation Data Acquisition Cost / GFM
Military Equipment Valuation (MEV)
DUID/APUID Filter
Asset Data Placed in Service Transfers/Retirements
/Losses
Fixed Asset Accounting (FAA)