A New Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

A New Theory

Description:

There are a few areas where we see a risk premium. Insurance against accidents ... 'That the automobile has practically reached the limit of its development' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: defp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A New Theory


1
A New Theory
  • Eric Falkenstein

2
Problem
  • There are a few areas where we see a risk premium
  • Insurance against accidents
  • Short end of the yield curve
  • On average, no risk premium
  • Negative risk premium to high risk
  • People seem to be gambling, not investing, in
    practice, with the same expected return to
    gambling

3
Simple Proof of no average risk-return
  • Say utility is relative
  • Y riskier than X in standard approach
  • Y and X same risk in relative sense
  • Risk is unnecessary choose ½(XY)
  • Like idiosyncratic risk, unnecessary risk
    unpriced

4
Why Relative Risk?
  • Easterlin Paradox
  • Benchmarking, tracking error as risk
  • Not a new idea
  • Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Thorsten Veblen, Max
    Weber, all focused on status (didnt formalize)
  • Pesendorfer (1995) and Rayo and Becker (2006)
    modeled status orientation formally

5
Utility Proof
  • Two assets, a risky security and a risk-free
    security, with returns RE and Rf
  • Where
  • (risk free return is certain)
  • There are two identical agents, i and i, who
    have wealth in period 0 of k, and spends money,
    ?, on the two assets
  • No consumption. In the next period, agent is
    wealth is thus

6
Utility Proof
  • Utility is relative
  • Max utility subject to budget constraint
  • Substituting for , because
    the budget constraint holds with equality.

7
Utility Proof
  • Taking the first order condition, we have
  • Since each agent is identical, in equilibrium
    each agent holds the same amount
  • So
  • Or
  • Which means, the expected return on risky assets
    is te risk free rate

8
Utility Proof Benchmark
  • Utility is absolute
  • Max utility subject to budget constraint
  • Substituting for , because
    the budget constraint holds with equality.

9
Utility Proof Benchmark
  • Taking the first order condition, we have
  • This is the standard result

10
Arbitrage Argument
  • Basically, if people are benchmarking against the
    market, ?1 has no risk
  • Then,
  • Through arbitrage
  • Which means, trivially, that all assets have the
    same return

11
Adjustment 1 Hope and Alpha
  • Search for alpha like Optimal stopping problem
  • Sample various investments xj where xjN(m,s2 )
  • Each investment costs cgt0
  • You get T draws (eg, 100)
  • At any stage n, can stop and receive xn in until
    T
  • Optimal to sample until xngtk(c,n, ?2 ,T), where k
    is the criterion for stopping

12
Optimal to sample until xngtk(c,n)
  • As the cost of sampling goes up, propensity to
    stop searching increases
  • As the variance of the sampling information
    increases, the propensity to stop searching
    decreases
  • As the time left in the draw goes down, the
    propensity to stop increases

13
Risk taking increases return
  • You are willing to pay to take risk because you
    get value from the extra sampling in many cases
    (cgt0)
  • Sampling more than once, for most parameters,
    will be the optimal solution for most situations
  • As time goes on, the ability to take such risk
    decreases because the benefits are not as great
  • High variance increases value for search
  • Forms our intuition

14
What is 'sampling' in practice?
  • Trying something to see if you have alpha
  • Trying out for football
  • Writing poetry
  • Appearing on American Idol
  • Most fail, miserably. Why it hurts to fail, it
    reflects on you.
  • Finding your best fit has big payoffs
  • Outside of organized sampling as in school,
    generally people will tell you, you have no chance

15
Ignoring the Experts when searching for alpha
  • That the automobile has practically reached the
    limit of its development
  • Scientific American 1909
  • Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible
  • Lord Kelvin 1895
  • There is no reason anyone would want a computer
    in their home
  • Ken Olson 1977
  • We stand on the threshold of rocket mail
  • US postmaster general Arthur Summerfield 1959
  • Nuclear-powered vacuum cleaners will probably be
    a reality in 10 years
  • Alex Lewyt President of Lewyt Vacuums, 1955

16
So, ignore the odds
  • People overconfident when they search for alpha
  • Good meta-strategy , bad investment strategy
  • Leads to excess demand for super risky assets

17
Where there is no Alpha, no hope, and Cash is
Useful
  • AAA-BBB spread, 3mo to 2 yr T-bills
  • No alpha searching here
  • Prescience too hard to prove
  • Everyone needs some amount of safety assets, cash
  • Cash is a medium of exchange, a property many
    investments do not have
  • Repos (cash) have T-bills, AAA securities as
    collateral

18
An Equilibrium Across All Assets
No Alpha Possible, no hope, no benchmarking
Alpha Possible, Benchmarking
Expected Return
Expensive Alpha Searching, Too much hope
Risk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com