Home Care Monitoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Home Care Monitoring

Description:

Hertfordshire provides Home Care services to over 8,500 service users ... Standard 2 The agency maintains proper insurance arrangements. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: hertsd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Home Care Monitoring


1
Home Care Monitoring
  • Guy Pettengell,
  • Head of Operational Contracts

2
Hertfordshire context
  • Hertfordshire provides Home Care services to over
    8,500 service users
  • Through around 90,000 visits every week
  • Around 3,000,000 hours of care per year
  • All services provided through external provision

3
The aims of monitoring
  • To ensure that contracted services continue to
    meet the HCC contract standards
  • To ensure that HCC is able to offer our Service
    Users a range of high quality, consistent and
    secure home care services

4
How we use monitoring data.
  • Evaluate and approve new providers
  • Ongoing Contract Management
  • Monitor provider quality
  • Support remedial action where necessary

5
The process.
  • Approval
  • Inspection
  • Quality Monitoring and Benchmarking
  • Electronic Monitoring

6
Approval Process.
  • Providers must be registered with CSCI
  • Providers must prove they meet HCC Contract
    Standards
  • HCCs policy is to only contract with approved
    providers

7
Contract Standards.
  • Standard 1 The agency operates on a sound
    financial footing.
  • Standard 2 The agency maintains proper insurance
    arrangements.
  • Standard 3 The agency operates an effective
    Quality assurance system.
  • Standard 4 The agency ensures that management
    systems and staff workloads enable safe and
    effective service delivery to service users.
  • Standard 5 Staff are competent and receive
    training necessary to meet the needs of service
    users.
  • Standard 6 The agency complies with Health and
    Safety Legislation
  • Standard 7 The agency provides a professional
    service, respecting the rights of service
    users and does not discriminate in the
    provision of services or its employment
    practices because of race, religion, gender,
    disability, age or sexual orientation.
  • Standard 8 The agency has effective arrangements
    for service users to make representation about
    the nature and Quality of the service received.
  • Standard 9 Service users are protected from abuse
    and exploitation.

8
Additional Standards for live in care providers.
  • 24 Hour Live In Care
  • Standard 10 The agency has effective arrangements
    for the replacement of a careworker in case of
    emergency.
  • Standard 11 The agency must ensure formal
    monitoring of the Quality of service and
    standard of care provided is conducted on-site
    with the service user on a monthly basis.
  • Standard 12 The agency must conduct monthly
    on-site supervisions with care workers.
  • Standard 13 The agency produces written guidance
    for careworkers regarding standards of personal
    behaviour expected whilst providing a live in
    service.

9
Approval How?
  • Provider makes an application
  • Includes 2 year Accounts
  • Includes appropriate insurance documentation
  • Includes 2 professional references

10
  • Contracts Officer carries out an initial
    evaluation of policies / procedures against
    contract standards
  • Financial viability and insurance checked
  • Employment status checked
  • Indicative price

11
  • Any requirements are notified with specified
    timescales
  • Once requirements met the contracts unit carries
    out an initial inspection
  • If the provider passes this inspection and meets
    all of HCCs contract standards they become
    eligible to contract, and will be added to the
    Approved List

12
How we monitor and strive to improve standards
  • A minimum of one annual Inspection against
    contract standards (inc. QMO feedback).
  • Through EF1 data.
  • Through RR1 data.
  • Through QQ1 / 2 feedback.
  • Through Electronic Monitoring.
  • Quality Matrix (Benchmarking).
  • Six monthly reviews with Block providers.

13
1.Inspection
  • Annual Contract compliance inspection (full day)
  • Published Inspection Report including QMO
    feedback
  • Any Requirements Identified, action plan agreed
  • Report scored (based on three levels of risk
    current / imminent / possible) and entered in
    Quality Matrix

14
EF1 (Electronic Form 1)
  • EF1 completed monthly by SST and sent to
    Contracts Unit listing all concerns / complaints
    / compliments
  • Concerns weighted by 14 categories / and by
    volume
  • Info collated into Countywide spreadsheet to
    identify any trends
  • Major concerns / issues / trends taken up
    directly
  • Quarterly evaluation entered into Quality Matrix

15
3.RR1 (Referrals/Refusals Form 1)
  • RR1 returned to Contracts by SST on a monthly
    basis
  • Used to monitor take up of work inc. increases /
    decreases
  • Results added into Quality Matrix

16
4. QQ1 / 2 Quality Questionnaires 1 and 2
  • Quality Questionnaires (QQ1) sent to SSTs for
    completion
  • Quality Questionnaires (QQ2) completed by
    contracting team inc. electronic monitoring
    performance
  • Data entered into Quality Matrix

17
5. Electronic Monitoring.
  • A number of K.P.Is are used in respect to
    monitoring provider performance, inc
  • Arrival time within 15 minutes
  • Continuity of Care
  • Average length of calls
  • Invoice Split

18
6. Quality Matrix.
  • All data entered quarterly into Quality Matrix
  • The scores achieved for each of the elements are
    then entered to produce the final Total Quality
    Score. However each individual element has a
    minimum benchmark figure to exceed.
  • Inspection Report (60)
  • Feedback from QMOs (70)
  • Quality Questionnaires (60)
  • EF1 (60)
  • RR1 (90)
  • Electronic Monitoring criteria (75)

19
7. Six monthly reviews
  • All relevant data obtained through monitoring is
    discussed with provider (inc. QMO feedback)
  • Actions to improve service (inc. timescales)
    agreed
  • Ongoing monitoring of action plan at formal
    reviews (either 1, 2 or 3 monthly)
  • Links with CSCI e.g work ceased with Level 1
    services

20
The future
  • The Monitoring processes used by the Contracts
    Unit have achieved recognition as an example of
    Best Practice by the Audit Commission for the
    Joint Review Toolkit
  • http//www.joint-reviews.gov.uk/money/homepage.ht
    ml
  • Hertfordshire is recognised nationally as the
    leader in the implementation and use of
    Electronic Monitoring. (DOH Case Study), and in
    market management (CSIP e-book).
  • However with nearly 90,000 visits each and every
    week things do go wrong. Because of this the
    Contracts Unit continues to work with colleagues
    to strive for continuous improvement and better
    quality services.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com