Curriculum Renewal: Fidelity of Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Curriculum Renewal: Fidelity of Implementation

Description:

Half day. FAQ. All obs in 1 qtr. Help accessed. Note legible in parent conf ... Science for All Children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: wera5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Curriculum Renewal: Fidelity of Implementation


1
Curriculum Renewal Fidelity of Implementation
  • WERA/OSPI State Assessment ConferenceSeattle
    Airport Hilton December 4, 2008
  • Peter Hendrickson, Ph.D.
  • Everett Public Schools

2
Program Evaluation
  • Fidelity of Implementation
  • Program Model
  • Theory of Action or Logic Model
  • To what extent, consistent?
  • Program Impacts
  • Knowledge
  • Skills
  • Dispositions

3
Theory of Action
  • What are you doing?
  • Who are you doing it with?
  • What resources do you have?
  • What effects do you expect?
  • (Green, 2008)

4
Logic Model fragment
5
FOI Critical Components
  • Structural/ procedural
  • Structural/ educative
  • Instructional/ pedagogical
  • Student engagement
  • What to do
  • Need to know
  • Instructional strategies
  • Expectations for students
  • (Century et.al., 2007)

6
Degree implemented
  • On Model, Off Model
  • Various Models, e.g.
  • Read 180 90 minute
  • Local 55 minute HS
  • Local 45 minute MS
  • Local 45 minute, plus 30 SSR

7
Direct Observation--Tools
  • Observation protocol
  • Train observers
  • Timely feedback
  • Additional information
  • Use the data

8
FOI Framework, p.1
9
FOI Framework, p. 2
10
Zoomerang survey
  • Objectives
  • Design
  • Format, pilot
  • Administer, remind
  • Organize data
  • Analyze
  • Report

11
Focus groups
  • Representative
  • Possible time
  • Field test
  • Conduct
  • Transcribe, validate
  • Content analysis

12
Interviews
  • Go to their turf
  • Probe for key elements
  • Keep short
  • Listen for unexpected
  • Dont argue
  • Act on findings

13
Software monitoring
  • Who enrolled
  • Time on software
  • Books read
  • Vocabulary growth
  • Comprehension growth
  • Coasting?

14
Student Information System
  • Present
  • Tardy
  • Gender
  • Ethnicity
  • Prior learning
  • Special programs

15
References
  • Bamberger, M., J. Rugh, L. Mabry. (2006). Real
    World Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
    Publications. Three veteran program evaluators
    reveal tricks of the trade with limited
    resources, time or commitment.
  • Borman, G., Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A.,
    Chamberlain, A., Madden, N.A., Chambers, B.
    (2007). Final reading outcomes of the national
    randomized field trial of Success for All.
    American Educational Research Journal, 44 (3),
    701-731. When implementing Success for All,
    considerable emphasis is placed on fidelity.
    External evaluators, extensive training for
    building principals, building-wide commitment and
    exhaustive instructional rubrics set the program
    apart from most other literacy models.
  • CEMSE. (2007). Fidelity of Implementation
    Questionnaires for Mathematics Curriculum in
    Grades 1-5. , Chicago, IL University of
    Chicago.
  • CEMSE. (2008). Critical Components Definitions
    and Explanations. Retrieved November 21, 2008
    from the Worldwide Web at http//cemse.uchicago.ed
    u/files/CCDefinitions summary 2008_11_110.pdf
    This fully fleshed math and science FOI checklist
    provides a useful base document for creating
    local checklists.

16
References
  • Century, J., Freeman, C., Rudnick, M., Leslie,
    D. (2007). A conceptual framework for fidelity of
    implementation of instructional materials. Paper
    presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
    Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
    March 28th 2008.
  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of
    Change. San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
  • Hendrickson, P. (2008). Unpublished principal
    interview protocols for several program
    evaluations. Everett, WA Everett Public
    Schools.
  • --. (2006). Read 180 Placement, Assessment and
    Reporting Guide. NYC, NY Scholastic. The PARG is
    a companion tool to the Research Protocol and
    Tools (2007).
  • Kerman, Sam. (1979). Teacher Expectations and
    Student Achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, v.60,
    n.10, p. 716-18, June 1979.
  • National Sciences Resource Center. (1977).
    Science for All Children. Washington, D.C.
    National Academy Press.
  • Zoomerang is available free via www.zoomerang.com
    on the Worldwide Web to implement surveys for
    limited use. A full license is less than 500
    per year. Survey Monkey works, too.

17
Contact Information
  • Peter Hendrickson, Ph.D.
  • Curriculum Specialist
  • Assessment, Research, Program Evaluation
  • Everett Public Schools
  • Tel 425.385.4057
  • E phendrickson_at_everettsd.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com