Title: Nameplate Inspection System
1May03-07
Nameplate Inspection System
Abstract
Design Requirements
- Design Objectives
- Inspect a large amount of plates without causing
delays in the current manufacturing process - Process different thicknesses and dimensions of
nameplates without being affected by adhesives - System integrates with existing machinery
- Functional Requirements
- Must not damage plates during separation
- The system must be programmable to handle
different quantities and dimensions of plates - Vision system can keep pace with the changing
manufacturing needs - Design Constraints
- The system will require little user intervention
and assure the quality of the nameplates - The client will determine an appropriate size and
cost for the system - The system will not compromise the safety of the
operator - Measurable Milestones
- Project documentation
- Mechanical system design
- Vision system design
- Mechanical system creation
- Vision system creation
- Inspection system integration
Metalcraft, Inc of Mason City desires a system
that will inspect nameplates for defects. The
system must mechanically separate the plates from
each other, inspect each one for defects, restack
the correctly manufactured nameplates and inform
user of any defects. The nameplates to be
inspected have an adhesive backing on them that
causes glue residue on the sides of the plate,
resulting in the plates sticking together and
interfering with the individual inspection of the
plates.
Acknowledgements
The invaluable technical advice as well as the
equipment needed for the final system will be
provided by MetalCraft, Inc. They have extensive
knowledge of the nameplates as well experience in
building various systems to support their
manufacturing process.
Introduction
- General Background
- Metalcraft currently uses costly manual
inspection of nameplates which does not ensure
consistency in products - Nameplates must be inspected to ensure proper
sequencing, position of printed items, missing or
erroneous print and any other anomalies - A visual nameplate inspection system will be
designed to automate the inspection process and
guarantee high quality nameplates - Technical Problem
- Separate nameplates from each other
- Consistently deliver a single plate to the vision
system - Inspect plates for defects in sequence,
positioning and print quality - Inform operator of results so that defective
plates can be reprinted and put in the proper
sequence - Operating Environment
- Relatively clean space which aids visual
inspection - Intended Users and Uses
- Metalcraft, Inc. and its employees shall use the
system to inspect various quantities and sizes of
nameplates - Assumptions
- The entire system is first concerned with
separating the plates and then inspecting them
for defects - There is limited space for modifications of the
current machinery - Limitations
- There is a limited amount of time to work on the
project - Travel distance will limit the amount of face to
face contact with the client
Technical Approach
- The problem will be divided into two
sub-problems - The mechanical system will concentrate on
separating plates and delivering them to the
vision system - The vision system will focus on the inspection of
the plates for quality assurance
Testing Approach
- The two systems will be tested separately
- Mechanical system prototype will be used to
assure correct operation and separation of
nameplates - Subset of nameplates will be presented to the
vision system to verify defect detection and
compared against manual inspection results
Financial Budget
The financial resources this project will be
donated by Metalcraft, Inc. either through
monetary contributions or the donation of
necessary parts.
Personnel Effort
End-Product Description
The mechanical system shall be able to transfer
nameplates of various sizes one at a time to the
vision system where the nameplate will then be
inspected for defects and abnormalities.
Rejected plates will be reported to the operator.
The inspection system will be programmable from
a PC and able to operate with minimal attendance
from the user.
Team Members Ben Weatherman bennyw_at_iastate.edu Ja
cob Powell jacob_powell_at_yahoo.com Paul
Slifka pslifka_at_iastate.edu Dejan
Leginovic dejanl_at_iastate.edu
Faculty Advisors John Lamont jwlamont_at_iastate.ed
u Ralph E. Patterson, III repiii_at_iastate.edu
Client