Title: Energy Efficiency in Washington State
1Energy Efficiencyin Washington State
- Speaker Pro Tem Jeff Morris
2Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Improve energy efficiency standards.
- One of the first 10 states to adopt energy
efficiency laws on 10 appliances for in-state use
that could conserve some 90 mWh of electricity by
2020, enough to power over 90,000 homes.
3Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- ESHB 1062 2005 - Created minimum efficiency
standards and testing procedures for 12
categories of electrical products - Automatic commercial ice cube machines
- Commercial clothes washers
- Commercial pre-rinse spray valves
- Commercial refrigerators and freezers
- Illuminated exit signs
- Low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers
- Metal halide lamp fixtures
- Single-voltage AC to DC power supplies
- Incandescent reflector lamps
- Torchieres
- Traffic signal modules
- Commercial space heaters
4Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- ESHB 1004 (2009)
- Created minimum efficiency standards and testing
procedures for 6 categories of electrical
products - Wine chillers
- Hot water dispensers and mini-tank electric water
heaters - Bottle-type water dispensers and point-of-use
water dispensers - Pool heaters, pool pump motors, and portable
electric spas - Tub spout diverters and showerhead-tub spout
diverters - Commercial hot food holding cabinets.
5Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Building Energy Codes
- Buildings account for approximately one third of
energy use and carbon emissions, making them an
important target for state energy efficiency
policies. The time of design and construction
represents the greatest opportunity to build
efficiency into the total building. Builders
typically bear the capital cost of energy
efficiency improvements, but homeowners and
tenants see the benefits through lower energy
bills. Because most builders build
speculatively, they have no feedback loop from
the occupant to tell them to build in efficiency
features.
6Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Building Energy Codes
- Washington was one of the early adopters
nationwide by creating their own state energy
code in 1977. Its state energy code emerged from
Model Conservation Standards developed in the
Northwest region during the 1980s under the
Northwest Power Planning Act (Act), which
Congress passed in 1980 to require consideration
of conservation as the preferred method to
accommodate load growth in the Bonneville Power
Administration Region. -
- According to the ACEE 2008 Scorecard, Washington
received full marks (8 out of 8) for its State
Building Energy Codes, tying in first place with
California and Oregon, creating a strong "West
Coast" standard for state building energy codes.
7Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Building Energy Codes
- E2SSB 5854 (2009)
- Requires the State Building Code Council to adopt
energy codes for new homes and buildings that
will gradually move towards the state achieving a
70 percent reduction in energy use for such
buildings by 2031. If economic, technical, or
process factors may interfere with achieving this
reduction target, the Council must report its
findings to the Legislature. - Requires CTED to develop a strategic plan for
enhancing energy efficiency and reducing
greenhouse gases in homes, buildings and
neighborhoods. In doing so must identify
barriers to achieving net zero energy use and
ways to overcome these barriers in future updates
to the State Energy Code.
8Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Washington received the highest score possible --
5/5 -- from the ACEE for its electricity energy
efficiency program spending in 2006. As a
percent of total utility revenues, Washington
ranked second overall (behind Vermont) by
spending 2.2 percent of total utility revenues on
electricity energy efficiency programs (not
including weatherization program funding).
9Integrated Resource Planning key to a Regions
Future
- What is an Integrated resource plan?
- Integrated Resource Planning is an assessment of
demand-side and supply-side resources, evaluated
under consistent assumptions, to produce a
cost-effective resource mix that meets expected
short-term and long-term demand. The goals of the
IRP are to produce a best-cost portfolio of
supply side and demand side management
alternatives to meet customer requirements of
reliability under given constraints, to reduce
costs for customers, to help diversify energy
supply mix, and to improve modeling of demand,
supply, and conservation.
10Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- ESHB 1010 (2006) requires all investor-owned and
consumer-owned electric utilities (with more than
25,000 customers) to develop detailed integrated
resource plans (IRPs) that describe the mix of
generating resources and conservation and
efficiency resources that will meet current and
projected needs of the utility at the lowest
reasonable cost. These plans must contain a
number of elements, including (1) demand
forecasts for at least the next 10 years (2)
assessments of commercially available
conservation and efficiency resources (3)
assessments of commercially available utility
scale renewable and nonrenewable generating
technologies (4) comparative evaluation of
renewable and nonrenewable generating resources
(5) integration of the demand forecasts and
resource evaluations into a long-range assessment
describing the mix of supply side generating
resources and conservation and efficiency
resources and (6) a short-term plan identifying
the specific actions to be taken by the utility
consistent with their long-range IRP.
11Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- ESHB 1010 (2006) continued. All other utilities
in the state, including those utilities that
receive essentially all of their power from
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), must file
either an IRP or a less detailed "resource plan"
(RP). If such a utility elects to file an RP, it
must (1) estimate loads for the next 5 and 10
years (2) enumerate the resources that will be
maintained and/or acquired to serve those loads
and (3) explain, if the resources chosen are not
renewable resources or conservation and
efficiency resources, why such a decision was
made. - http//www.cted.wa.gov/site/1140/default.aspx
12Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Some regional IRP examples includeÂ
- Avista Key energy efficiency highlights (2007
IRP) - The Preferred Resource Strategy (PRS) includes
350 MW of CCCT, 300 MW of wind, 35 MW of other
Renewables, and 87 MW of conservation between
2007 and 2017. - Â Conservation acquisition is approximately 25
percent higher than in its 2005 IRP. - http//www.avistautilities.com/inside/resources/ir
p/electric/Documents/2007AvistaIRP.Pdf - http//www.avistautilities.com/inside/resources/ir
p/electric/Documents/2007AvistaIRPSupplemental.pdf
13Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Some regional IRP examples includeÂ
- PSE Key energy efficiency highlights (2007 IRP)
- It is estimated that there is 702 aMW of
technically feasible electric energy efficiency
potential by the end of the 20-year planning
horizon in 2027. - Approximately 434 aMW of these resources are
cost-effective with an average levelized per unit
cost of five (5) cents per kWh. - Across all sectors, 341 aMW (nearly 80 of the
economic potential) are deemed reasonably
achievable. - Â If fully deployed, the identified achievable
potentials amount to nearly 10 of PSEs forecast
load in 2027, and 30 of the projected load
growth over the 20-year planning period. - http//www.pse.com/energyEnvironment/energysupply/
Pages/energyResourcePlanning.aspx
14Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Washingtons The Department of General
Administration (GA) offers energy savings
performance contracting to enable
capital-strapped state agencies, school
districts, and municipalities to tap various
outside capital sources for energy upgrades.
According to GA, since 1986 over 100 projects
have utilized energy savings performance
contracting to install energy efficiency
measures, adding up to approximately 152,895,053
in total facility improvements to date, with a
total avoided cost since 1986 of approximately
66,310,408. - Â http//www.ga.wa.gov/EAS/epc/espc.htm
- Â http//www.ga.wa.gov/EAS/epc/convinced.htm
15Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Recent Legislative Activity
- SHB 1895 (2005)Authorizes aggregated energy
audits and conservation measures for
municipalities. Municipalities may conduct
energy audits and implement cost-effective energy
conservation measures among multiple government
agencies. - ESSB 5509 (2005) Provides that all major
facility projects funded in the state capital
budget, or projects financed through a financing
contract as defined in RCW 39.94.020, must be
designed, constructed and certified to at least
meet the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) silver
standard. This requirement applies to any
entity, including public agencies and public
school districts.
16Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Recent Legislative Activity Continued
- E2SSB 5854 (2009)Requires qualifying public
agencies to create an energy benchmark and report
the performance rating for each reporting public
facility. GA must establish a state Portfolio
Manager Master Account to provide shared
reporting for all public facilities. - By July 1, 2011, reporting public facilities with
a performance rating score below 50 (average)
must conduct a preliminary energy audit. An
investment grade audit must be completed by July
1, 2013 if potential cost-effective energy
conservation measures are identified. Any
identified cost-effective energy conservation
measures must be implemented by July 1, 2016. Â
17Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Recent Legislative Activity Continued
- State agencies may not enter into a new lease or
lease renewal for a building with a performance
rating score below 75 unless a preliminary audit
has been conducted within the last 2 years, and
the owner agrees to perform an investment grade
audit and implement cost-effective energy
conservation measures within the first 2 years of
the lease agreement. OFM may waive these
requirements if it determines compliance is not
cost-effective or feasible. - Â GA must review the cost and delivery of agency
programs to determine the viability of relocating
from buildings leased by the state with an energy
performance score below 50. - http//www.cted.wa.gov/site/1140/default.aspx
18Examples of Energy Efficiency Policy
- Electric Energy Efficiency Programs
- Recent Legislative Activity Continued
- HB 1007 2009 State Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy Improvement Loans. The
Commission must make available secured loans to
certified applicants for the purpose of providing
financing for all or part of the project costs of
any energy efficiency improvement or renewable
energy improvement. The period of such loans is
10 years for energy efficiency improvements and
25 years for renewable energy improvements. The
Commission must periodically issue Sustainable
Energy Trust bonds for the purpose of financing
the project costs of energy efficiency
improvements and renewable energy improvements
19Utilities Assumed Relatively Modest Base-Case
Carbon Emission Price Projections
Levelized Carbon Emission Price Projections
(2010-2030)
20(No Transcript)
21Global GHG abatement cost curve beyond
business-as-usual 2030 McKinsey
22(No Transcript)
23Firming the Challenge!
24WECC RPS Mandates
25Renewables.WECC wide Goals vs. Current
26Legislative Issues Going Forward
- Changing RPS law in Washington
- Standard offer(feed-in tariff)
- Risk of market spikes caused by uncoordinated
mandates - Transmission critical for immediate mandates
- Boutique standards for RPS mandates in Region
- What Climate Change Policy? Cap and Trade or
Carbon Tax? - Pancaking of climate change taxes
- Credit situation not forecasted in projections.
- Lack of regional Strategy on new/clean energy
-
27Thank you!