Title: A%20registrars%20prospective%20on%20ccTLD
1A registrars prospective on ccTLDs
- Presented by
- John L. Kane
- Vice President, Business Development
- eNom, Inc.
2About eNom
- 6 million names on the eNom platform
- 4.7 million eNom names
- 1.3 million others
- 12,626 active resellers
- Won Best Registrar for Resellers award
- The largest reseller network
- From large companies to individuals
- Technology platform for 90 ICANN registrars
- 2 billion DNS queries per day
- Currently offering over 40 TLDsand growing
- Hundreds of geographically dispersed servers
Seattle, Chicago, Dallas, Washington DC, San
Jose, London
3The countries where eNom has resellers include
Argentina Kuwait Egypt Pakistan
Australia Cayman Islands Spain Poland
Beruda Kazakhstan Finland Qatar
Barbados Lebanon France Romania
Bulgaria Luxembourg Great Britain Russian Federation
Belgium Morocco Grenada South Africa
Brazil Malawi Hong Kong Saudi Arabia
Bhutan Malaysia Croatia Sweden
Belize Nigeria Hungary Singapore
Canada Netherlands Indonesia Slovenia
Chile Norway Ireland Thailand
Costa Rica New Zealand India Turkey
Denmark Oman Iran Ukraine
Algeria Panama Italy United States
Ecuador Peru Japan Venezuela
Estonia Philippines Switzerland United Arab Emirates
Saint Kitts Vietnam
Not a complete list
4Role of ccTLD registry
- Preserving the role of the registrar relationship
Registry
Registrar
Registrant
- Registry should be responsible for providing
support and service to the registrars while
fulfilling the charter. We understand that all
ccTLDs are not allotted the same flexibility in
working with registrars or customers. - Registrars are responsible to maintain the
relationship with the registrants. - When registrants can manage their domains though
the registry issues such as accurate whois,
contact data, name servers and expiration dates
can get out of sync with the registry and
registrar
5Growth Challenges
- Many new ccTLDs are offered without any value
proposition - Getting the word out
- Expensive for large companies to protect their
brand typically focus on the largest ccTLDs - Too many restrictions make it hard to registrar
- Manual components to the processtoo labor
intensive
6Growth opportunities
- Partner with a existing registry (Afilias or
VeriSign, others) or aggregator (Key Systems,
Name Store) to offer services - Recent successes such as .in (india) still had
many restrictions but easier from a registrar
prospective to offer - Piggy back on marketing efforts
- More aggressive pricing
- Registrars are able to offer more ccTLDs per
integration - Registrars want to offer more ccTLDs to their
customers and registrants want one registrar to
manage their domains
7ccTLDs Successes
- Successful alternate value propositions (.am,
.fm, .tv, .tm etc) - Opening up second level domains for registration
(.es and .tw) - Simplifying the transfer process
- Registration in EPP (.eu)
- Creating a buzz around the brand or new
offerings
84Ps Conclusions
- Product
- eNom could offer more ccTLDs if integration was
easier or platforms were standardized. Keep
manual paperwork to a minimum if any. - Price
- eNom must provide resellers prices that will
allow them to compete effectively in their
markets - Proposition
- ccTLDs must understand who their prospective
customers are to truly take advantage of its
markets build brand around strengths - Promotion
- ccTLDs should systematically improve their
marketing capabilities and marketing message
provide registrars with better marketing tools - ccTLDs should invest more resources in a
targeted marketing efforts