CLASSROOM STRATEGIES TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON CATS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

CLASSROOM STRATEGIES TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON CATS

Description:

CLASSROOM STRATEGIES TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON CATS. PAM CLEMONS ... Everything has changed but our ways of thinking. ... Renate Nummela Caine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: tims187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CLASSROOM STRATEGIES TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON CATS


1
CLASSROOM STRATEGIES TO INCREASE STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT ON CATS
  • PAM CLEMONS
  • pclemons_at_kde.state.ky.us
  • OFFICE OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS
  • 502-564-3421

2
People desire change - they resist being
changed.
3
" Everything has changed but our ways of
thinking. If we do not change these, we drift
toward unparalleled catastrophe."
Albert Einstein
4
Support
Develop
Build
Envision
Discover
Create
5
A skilled craftsman has...
  • has good tools
  • fixes mistakes
  • knows what tool to use for the job


6
FOCUS BEACONS
  • RESEARCH BASED STRATEGIES
  • USING PROGRAM OF STUDIES
  • ALIGNING CURRICULUM/CORE CONTENT
  • INTERDISCIPLINARY LESSONS/REAL WORLD
  • QUESTIONING TECHNIQUES
  • LESSON PLANNING
  • ASSESSING FORMALLY AND INFORMALLY

7
LEARNING ACTIVITY RETENTIONWilliam Glasser, THE
QUALITY SCHOOL
8
LEARNING MEMORY
LEARNING STYLES
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES
  • MEMORY LANES
  • SEMANTIC
  • EMOTIONAL
  • EPISODIC
  • PROCEDURAL
  • AUTOMATIC

9
LOCAL CURRICULUM
ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS
PROGRAM OF STUDIES
CORE CURRICULUM
WHAT ABOUT CORE CONTENT FOR ASSESSMENT?
10
(No Transcript)
11
Children learn best if they are immersed in
complex experiences and are given the opportunity
to actively process what they have learned.
Renate Nummela Caine
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999
12
BENEFITS
  • Teacher collaboration
  • Student involvement
  • Higher level thinking
  • Content mastery
  • Mirrors real world
  • Less fragmented learning
  • International Center for Leadership in Education
    1999-Helen M. Branigan, Sr. Consultant

13
The biggest obstacle to interdisciplinary
planning is that people try to do too much at
once. What they need to look for are some, not
all, natural overlaps between subjects.
Heidi Hayes Jacobs
14
Education Research--Interdisciplinary Curriculum
What have we learned?
  • Improves higher level thinking skills
  • Lessens fragmented learning
  • Heightens the opportunity for transfer of
    learning
  • Improves mastery of content
  • Improves motivation to learn
  • International Center for Leadership in Education
    1999-Helen M. Branigan, Sr. Consultant

15
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999-Dr. Richard Jones
16
  • STANDARDS DRIVEN
  • TEACHING THE RIGHT THINGS
  • STUDENT CENTERED
  • NOT ABOUT MORE CONTENT BUT ABOUT MORE APPLICATION

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
17
TEACHER QUESTIONS
  • Questions are an effective strategy because draw
    students into a conversation, stimulate thought
    and influence direction of communication.
  • Questions are driving force of good communication.

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
18
EFFECTIVE TEACHER QUESTIONS
  • Planned and directly relate to topic
  • Focused on depth of response instead of breadth
  • Precise rather than vague
  • Elicit follow-up questions used to probe for
    more answers

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
19
6 TYPES OF QUESTIONS
  • INFORMATIONAL - request specific information
    limited responses
  • ANALYTICAL - stimulate reflection, comparing,
    giving a response
  • IMAGINATIVE - open-ended and challenge
    considering vast amount of information
  • FOLLOW-UP - probe for further information,
    clarify misunderstandings or redirect thinking
  • OPINION - way for questioners to make known
    opinions
  • CONVERSATIONAL- prompts to facilitate conversation

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
20
EFFECTIVE USE OF INFORMATIONAL QUESTIONS
  • TYPICAL WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE types
  • USED TO BUILD CONFIDENCE AND WILLINGNESS TO
    RESPOND PRIOR TO INTRODUCING AN OPEN-ENDED
    QUESTION (requires more thinking)

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.Dr. Richard Jones
21
EFFECTIVE USE OF ANALYTICAL QUESTIONS
  • EXPLANATION QUESTIONS RESULT IN STUDENTS THINKING
    ABOUT A PROCESS OR SYSTEM
  • USUALLY START HOW DO...?
  • 3 TYPES - EXPLANATION (REQUIRES TO CONFRONT OWN
    UNDERSTANDING), DISCOVERY (REQUIRES, AND CAUSATION

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
22
INSTRUCTION
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
23
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.
Application Model
Blooms
Application
1. Awareness 2.Comprehension 3.
Application 4. Analysis 5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation

1. Knowledge of one discipline 2. Application
within discipline 3. Application across
disciplines 4. Application to real world
predictable situations 5. Application to real
world unpredictable situations
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
24
Rigor/Relevance Framework
  • APPLICATION MODEL
  • KNOWLEDGE IN ONE DISCIPLINE
  • APPLICATION WITHIN A DISCIPLINE
  • APPLICATION ACROSS DISCIPLINES
  • APPLICATION TO REAL-WORLD
  • PREDICATABLE SITUATIONS
  • APPLICATION TO REAL-WORLD UNPREDICTABLE SITUATIONS

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
25
Rigor/Relevance Framework
  • KNOWLEDGE TAXONOMY
  • AWARENESS
  • COMPREHENSION
  • APPLICATION
  • ANALYSIS
  • SYNTHESIS
  • EVALUATION

1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
26
Complex use of knowledge
Continuum of Knowledge
Recall of knowledge
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999-Dr. Richard Jones
27
Continuum of Application
Knowledge for its own sake
Use of that Knowledge
1
2
3
4
5
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999-Dr. Richard Jones
28
Rigor/Relevance Framework
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999-Dr. Richard Jones
Knowledge
Application
1
2
3
4
5
29
Rigor/Relevance Framework
International Center for Leadership in Education
1999-Dr. Richard Jones
6
D
C
5
4
3
2
B
A
1
1
2
3
4
5
30
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
31
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
6
Adaptation
Assimilation
5
4
3
2
Acquisition
Application
1
1
2
3
4
5
32
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
33
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
34
EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
  • INQUIRY
  • PROJECT DESIGN
  • PROBLEM SOLVING
  • TEACHER QUESTIONS
  • SIMULATIONS
  • WORK-BASED LEARNING
  • INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY

35
KEY QUESTIONS
  • What is the focus of the instructional unit
    (topic, area, theme, setting or concepts)?
  • What are students expected to know and be able to
    do (knowledge and application level)?
  • What student work will be used to measure
    achievement?
  • What content will students need?
  • What key questions and/or concepts will trigger
    student interest?
  • What assessment and instruction will be effective?

36
TRADITI0NAL INSTRUCTNAL PLANNING
LINEAR
INSTRUCTION
CURRICULUM
ASSESSMENT
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
37
PERFORMANCE PLANNING MODEL
1999 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN
EDUCATIONS, INC.-Dr. Richard Jones
ASSESSMENT
CURRICULUM PLANNING STEPS
FEEDBACK / EVALUATION
INSTRUCTION
38
YARD BY YARD, LIFE IS HARD, BUT INCH BY INCH,
LIFE IS A CINCH
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com