DORSAL STRIATUM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

DORSAL STRIATUM

Description:

Group 3: sham lesions. CUE/PLACE TASK ... SHAM. DLS. Conclusions ... SHAM. Conclusions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: people68
Category:
Tags: dorsal | striatum | sham

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DORSAL STRIATUM


1
DORSAL STRIATUM
  • ANATOMY.
  • ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY.
  • BEHAVIOR.

2
ANATOMY
  • RECEIVES EXTENSIVE POLYMODAL SENSORY INFORMATION
    REPRESENTING EXTERNAL WORLD.
  • TOPOGRAPHICAL ORGANIZATION.

3
DORSAL STRIATUM
  • LASHLEY (1950)
  • The evidence seems conclusive that in mammals
    the basal ganglia are not an essential link in
    the patterning of learned activities.
  • WEBSTER (1961)
  • The discovery of the corticostriate projections
    from sensory areas was important in implicating
    the dorsal striatum in higher-order behavioral
    functions.

4
ANATOMY
  • RECEIVES INFORMATION ABOUT LIMB AND WHOLE BODY
    MOVEMENTS.

5
ANATOMY
6
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
  • VISUAL DISCRIMINATIONS.
  • ACTIVE AVOIDANCE.
  • STIMULUS-GUIDED HEAD TURNING.
  • SENSORY RESPONSES.
  • MOTOR RESPONSES.
  • SENSORY-TRIGGERED MOVEMENTS.

7
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
8
BEHAVIOR
  • ACTIVE AVOIDANCE.
  • EGO-CENTRIC MAZE LEARNING.
  • VISUALLY-GUIDED MAZE LEARNING.
  • REACHING, GROOMING, WATER MAZE.

9
TRIPLE DISSOCIATION
  • SPATIAL.
  • STIMULUS-RESPONSE.
  • CLASSICAL CONDITIONING.

10
Spatial Task
11
S-R Habit Task

12
Conditioned Cue Preference Task


Food
Paired
Unpaired
No Food
Training
Testing
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LEARNING AND MEMORY SYSTEMS
  • Between system competitions
  • Hippocampus and dorsal striatum

17
Method
  • 3 groups of subjects prepared
  • Group1 neurotoxic lesions of the dorso-lateral
    striatum.
  • Group 2 radio-frequency lesions of the fornix.
  • Group 3 sham lesions

18
CUE/PLACE TASK
  • A modified version of the standard spatial
    version of the water task

19
Cue-Place Acquisition
31 cue-place series repeated 3 times (12 days)
Competition Test
Visible platform moved to opposite quadrant
adapted from McDonald, R.J., White, N.M.
(1994). Parallel information processing in the
water maze Evidence for independent
memory systems involving dorsal striatum and
hippocampus. Behavioral and Neural
Biology, 61, 260-270.
20
Water maze Competition Test
Cue Response
Place Response
21
(No Transcript)
22
Control

Control
23
TRAIT DIFFERENCES
24
Dorso-Lateral Striatum
Hippocampus
25
(No Transcript)
26
SUMMARY
  • There is a balance between learning and memory
    systems in normal subjects.
  • Damage to one system enhances control by intact
    systems.
  • Abnormal behavior is caused by a shift in the
    balance between these systems.

27
Summary of Radial Arm Maze Results
McDonald White (1993). A triple dissociation of
memory systems Hippocampus amygdala, and
dorsal striatum. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107,
3-22.
28
STIMULUS-RESPONSE TASK (HABIT)

29
L
D-
response
30
Challenge 1
  • Design a set of procedures to more rigorously
    assess the extent of associative structures
    linked to the visual discrimination training
    experience.
  • institute reversal learning procedures
  • manipulate context
  • develop novel transfer tests

31
Question
  • Does the amygdala acquire information during
    acquisition of the visual discrimination task?

32
Method
  • train subjects to asymptotic performance on the
    visual discrimination task.
  • Reversal learning in a context different from
    original training.

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
REVERSAL LEARNING (L-, D) DIFFERENT CONTEXT
TRIAL BLOCK
36
Interim conclusion
  • The amygdala appears to acquire an association to
    the reinforced light cue during original
    training, an association that enhances reversal
    learning.

37
Question
  • What is the nature of the representation acquired
    by the amygdala?

38
Method
  • 3 groups of subjects prepared
  • Group1 lesions of the dorso-lateral striatum.
  • Group 2 lesions of amygdala.
  • Group 3 sham lesions

39
(No Transcript)
40
Method
  • Train subjects on the visual discrimination task.
  • after training execute a transfer test.
  • Conditioned cue preference task.

41
STIMULUS-REWARD


Food
Paired
Unpaired
No Food
Training
Testing
42
S-R ACQUISITION (L,D-)
100
90
80
70
60
MEAN CORRECT
50
SHAM
40
AMYGDALA
30
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TRIAL BLOCK
S-R ACQUISITION (L, D-)
100
90
80
70
MEAN CORRECT
60
50
SHAM
40
DLS
30
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TRIAL BLOCK
43
(No Transcript)
44
Conclusions
  • The amygdala incidentally acquires an association
    between the light cue and the reinforcer during
    visual discrimination training.
  • The dorso-lateral striatum simultaneously
    acquires a necessary association between the
    light cue and a turning response.

45
reward
L
D-
response
46
Question
  • Does the hippocampus acquire information during
    acquisition of the visual discrimination task?

47
Control experiments
  • Context-specificity.
  • Reversal learning in the same or different
    context from original learning.
  • Competition test.

48
(No Transcript)
49
CONTEXT DETECTION (L, D-)
100
100
same
same
diff
diff
90
95
80
90
MEAN CORRECT
LATENCY (sec)
70
85
60
80
50
40
75
PRE-SHIFT
SHIFT
POST-SHIFT
PRE-SHIFT
SHIFT
POST-SHIFT
DAY
DAY
50
Conclusion
  • expression of the stimulus-response (habit) is
    not context specific.

51
Design
52
Reversal learning
53
Conclusion
  • The rate of reversal learning is enhanced when it
    occurs away from the original training context.
  • We have hypothesized that a CS-no event
    association accrued to the non-reinforced dark
    arm during original training that hinders
    reversal learning in that context.

54
Competition
  • Return the group of subjects reversed in the
    different context to the original.

55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
Conclusions
  • A competition between memory systems occurs when
    subjects are brought back into the original
    training context after reversal learning.

58
Hippocampus
  • One mnemonic function linked to the hippocampus
    is context conditioning.
  • Assess the effects of hippocampal lesions on the
    context-specific inhibition effect.

59
(No Transcript)
60
REVERSAL LEARNING (L-, D) SAME CONTEXT
HPC
SHAM
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
TRIAL BLOCK
61
COMPETITION (L. D-)
100
90
80
70
60
MEAN CORRECT
50
40
30
HPC
20
SHAM
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
TRIAL BLOCK
62
Conclusions
  • The hippocampus acquires a context-specific
    inhibitory association during original training
    of the visual discrimination task.

63
context
reward
L
D-
response
64
(No Transcript)
65
Implications
  • Raises questions about attempts to link
    plasticity processes in specific brain areas to a
    type of learning.
  • Neurogenesis.
  • Plasticity cascades.
  • Non-invasive imaging.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com