Strategies for Fostering Academic Integrity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategies for Fostering Academic Integrity

Description:

Dr. Donald McCabe found that almost 75% of the 2,000 students surveyed admitted ... McCabe 1995 study: Serious cheating. Honor code schools = 54% Non-code schools 71 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: informat1701
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategies for Fostering Academic Integrity


1
Strategies for Fostering Academic Integrity
  • Kimberly B. Kelley
  • University of Maryland, University College
  • WCET Conference
  • November 2004

2
Cheating Quiz True or False?
  • A faculty member has little influence over
    whether a student will cheat
  • Peers are not influential in deterring their
    classmates from cheating
  • An honor code has no usefulness
  • Students mention grade pressure and their
    parents expectations as two reasons they might
    cheat
  • Cheating is perceived as very risky behavior by
    students

3
What Does this cartoon say about cheating?
4
Some Thoughts on the Cartoon
  • Students do not take cheating seriously
  • Teachers do take cheating seriously
  • Telling students not to cheat may not be
    effective
  • Threats may not be effective
  • Making a joke, with a serious side to it, may be
    one good way to get students attention, however
  • Ensuring punishment occurs, equitably, is
    imperative

5
National Research on Cheating
  • Dr. Donald McCabe found that almost 75 of the
    2,000 students surveyed admitted they engage in
    some cheating
  • Peer influence is an important contextual factor
    that decreases (or increases) cheating
  • Cheating behaviors occur because of personal and
    contextual motivators

6
Motivators to Cheat
  • Individual factors
  • Underclassmen
  • Students with lower grade point averages
  • Male students
  • Contextual Factors
  • Fraternity and sorority members
  • Intercollegiate athletics
  • When perceive peers cheat and are not caught (or
    get off easily)
  • Business and Engineering majors

7
Center for Intellectual Property Academic
Integrity Study (2003) Findings
  • 87.5 of faculty respondents teach at least one
    course per year
  • 63.3 reported having identified at least one act
    of academic dishonesty in their course in the
    last 12 months
  • The most common response to academic dishonesty
    is to give an F on the assignment

8
Fostering Academic Integrity
9
Approaches to Fostering Academic Integrity
  • The virtues approach
  • The Fundamental Values Project
  • The 10 Principles
  • The prevention approach
  • The police approach
  • Turnitin.com
  • Essay verification machine (EVE2)
  • Plagiarism.com

10
Fostering Academic Integrity Institutional
Approaches (1)
  • An academic integrity policy
  • Education for the campus community
  • Senior-level support for academic integrity
  • Implement an equitable, straight-forward system
    for adjudicating suspected policy violations
  • Engage students in the process
  • Support faculty in the process

11
Fostering Academic IntegrityInstitutional
Approaches (2)
  • Build awareness
  • Orientations
  • Required seminars
  • Syllabi
  • Encourage student leaders to educate their peers
  • Train faculty in strategies to deter cheating
  • Evaluate and revise policies and procedures
    regularly to ensure currency, equity and
    usefulness

12
Principles of Academic Integrity
  • What do you think is the role of the principles
    statement?
  • Would these principles work at your campus?

13
Honor Codes The Basics
  • Honor statement and/or code
  • Written pledge
  • Unproctored examinations
  • Zero tolerance provision / obligation to report
  • Student governance

14
Honor Code Effectiveness?
  • McCabe 1995 study
  • Serious cheating
  • Honor code schools 54
  • Non-code schools 71
  • Repeated test cheating
  • Honor code schools 7
  • Non-code schools 17

15
Honor Code Benefits
  • Student engagement in the process
  • Personal responsibility
  • A community that supports honesty
  • A preventative, not simply punitive, approach
  • Greater likelihood of positive peer pressure
  • Increases awareness

16
Modified Honor Codes (1)
  • Include
  • A student pledge
  • Student involvement in designing the code
  • Student involvement in the adjudication process
  • May or may not require student reporting of
    cheating by peers

17
Modified Honor Codes (2)
  • Proctored examinations
  • An academic integrity policy
  • Campus wide commitment to providing education in
    ethics
  • A principles statement

18
Evaluating a Modified Honor Code for Your Campus
Community
  • Get insights from students and faculty about the
    culture/efficacy of a code
  • Give faculty/students a role in creating and
    implementing policy
  • Involve students in governance
  • Ensure the process is fair, equitable, and
    procedures are enforced
  • Involve the campus community in implementation

19
The Online Environment and Academic Integrity
  • Proctored examinations essential
  • Drill and practice
  • Provide a conference dedicated to academic
    integrity discussions
  • Provide case studies and explore student views
  • Make academic integrity a prominent element of
    your course

20
The Case of Dr. Dumbledore
21
Thank You!
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com