Does Preschool have long term effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Does Preschool have long term effects

Description:

Irma Arteaga, Sarah Humpage, Arthur Reynolds & Judy Temple. University of Minnesota. One Year of Preschool or Two: Does it Matter for Long-term Outcomes ? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Irma54
Category:
Tags: effects | irma | long | preschool | term

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Does Preschool have long term effects


1
One Year of Preschool or Two Does it Matter for
Long-term Outcomes ?
Irma Arteaga, Sarah Humpage, Arthur Reynolds
Judy Temple University of Minnesota
April 27, 2009 HCRC Mini-Conference Promoting
Child Health and Wellbeing
2
State Public Preschool Percent of National
Population Enrolled
Source National Institute for Early Education
Research (NIEER). The state of preschool 2007.
Yearbook.
3
MN Preschool Enrollment, 2008
Source National Institute for Early Education
Research (NIEER) and American Community Survey.
4
Policy Issues
  • Policies on 1 versus 2 years of preschool vary
    by state.
  • There is evidence that some preschool is better
    than none.
  • Studies have found that a second year of
    preschool has short-term effects beyond one year
  • Head Start (Ritblatt et al., 2001) ? children
    scored higher on the intellectual-cultural and
    active-recreation outcomes, parents read
    significantly more often to their children.
  • Abbott (Barnett and Lamy, 2006) ? increase in
    childrens scores on vocabulary at the beginning
    of kindergarten.
  • ECLS-K (Loeb et al., 2007 ) ? increase in
    childrens scores on reading and math at
    kindergarten.

5
Research Questions
  • What is the effect of a 2nd year of preschool on
    early school adjustment over and above the first
    year?
  • Does the effect of a 2nd year of preschool
    persist into adolescence and adulthood?
  • 3. Does the impact of a 2nd year vary by child,
    family, and program characteristics?

6
Chicago Longitudinal Study
  • Follows a single cohort of 1,539 children.
  • The treatment group was composed of 989 children
    who graduated from the Chicago Child-Parent
    Centers. Centers are located in the highest
    poverty areas of Chicago.
  • A comparison group of 550 children also received
    Title 1 services, which consisted of all-day
    kindergarten rather than the CPC preschool.

7
Child-Parent Centers
  • Title I funded.
  • Serves children at risk of school failure
  • Educational and family-support services.
  • Teachers have bachelors degrees and are
    certified in early childhood education.
  • Reduced class sizes. Ratio is 17 to 2.
  • Intensive parent program.

8
MethodologyQuasi-experimental design
  • Selection into program
  • Dosage

9
Propensity Score Weighting (PSW) to address
selection bias
  • Controls for confounding characteristics that
    determine treatment and outcomes
  • The PSW estimator creates a reweighted data set
    that better resembles a randomized experiment.

Implementation
Step 1 Estimate the probability of being
assigned to the 0, 1 or 2 group.
Step 2 Use these estimated probabilities to
construct the weight
Step 3 Estimate the outcome equation weighting
by PSW.
10
With and Without PSW Correction
Note For all results, plt0.001, plt0.01,
plt0.05 plt.10.
11
CLS Readiness Reading (at/above national
average)

Note plt0.001, plt0.01, plt0.05 plt.10.
12
Parent involvement (5-point scale)

Note For all results, plt0.001, plt0.01,
plt0.05 plt.10.
13
Grade Retention(cumulative)

14
Special Education(cumulative)

15
Juvenile Outcomes

16
Adult Crime

17
Education Attainment

18
Occupation and Socioeconomic Status

19
By Mothers Education
20
By Mothers Education

21
Conclusions
  • A second year of preschool increases levels of
    school readiness and early achievement
  • A second year of preschool has significant
    effects on grade retention and special education
    these can be of greater magnitude than the first
    years.
  • A second year of preschool has lasting effects on
    behavioral outcomes (juvenile and adult crime)
    but not on educational attainment.
  • The positive effects of a second year are greater
    and more significant for more disadvantaged
    children.
  • The use of PSW on dose-response interventions is
    a versatile approach to bias reduction and can be
    widely used in other situations.

22
Policy Implications
  • If the goal of preschool is school readiness and
    early achievement, two years are better than one.
  • If the goal is enhancing long-term outcomes, the
    effects of two years are more mixed, but
    preventive effects were found for child
    maltreatment and juvenile arrest.
  • Facing budget constraints, results suggest that
    resources should be targeted to disadvantaged
    children.
  • For optimal effectiveness, interventions that
    extend beyond preschool are important to consider
    in policy decisions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com