Underachievement, failing boys and moral panics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Underachievement, failing boys and moral panics

Description:

Girls trounce the boys in examination league table' The Times, August 2000 ... Percentage of pupils achieving Level 3 or above in Key Stage 1 teacher ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: EmmaS60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Underachievement, failing boys and moral panics


1
Underachievement, failing boys and moral panics
  • Dr Emma Smith
  • School of Education
  • University of Birmingham
  • e.smith_at_bham.ac.uk

2
  • Girls trounce the boys in examination league
    table
  • The Times, August 2000
  • Sometimes it's hard to be a boy
  • Times Educational Supplement, June 2001
  • Is school biased against boys? Daily
    Mail, December 2000
  • White boys fail too
  • The Guardian, June 2005
  • Schools hit by death of discipline among boys
  • Daily Mail, August 2007
  • Failing boys put university drive in doubt
    Sunday Telegraph, August 2006

3
Evidence for underachievement
4
Percentage of pupils achieving Level 3 or above
in Key Stage 1 teacher assessments, 2004-2006
5
Participation in A-level chemistry
6
Why are boys failing?
  • Schools are sexist
  • Too few male teachers
  • Assessment is biased towards girls
  • Crisis in masculinity
  • Girl power
  • They arent failing

7
  • What is underachievement?

8
  • Underachievement or low achievement?
  • Reconsidering the evidence

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Achievement gaps A-level Chemistry (grade C)
13
Variation in gross annual earnings, male and
female full-time employees, 1999-2006
14
Percentage of students achieving level 5 or
above at Key Stage 3 in the core subjects.Group
1
Boys Girls
15
Percentage of students achieving level 5 or
above at Key Stage 3 in the core subjects.Group
2
White Black
16
Percentage of students achieving level 5 or
above at Key Stage 3 in the core subjects.Group 3
Non EAL EAL
17
Percentage of students achieving level 5 or
above at Key Stage 3 in the core subjects.Group 4
Non FSM FSM
18
Summary
  • Contemporary crisis of underachievement and
    failure among boys
  • Evidence points to achievement gaps, especially
    in literacy-based subjects
  • Explanations assessment practice, constructions
    of gender, feminised schools, innate differences
    between the sexes
  • Achievement gaps between boys and girls are not a
    new phenomenon, they are consistent over time and
    place, especially in literacy based subjects
  • They are dwarfed by achievement gaps between
    wealthy/less wealthy and between some ethnic
    majority/minority groups
  • Men still earn more money than women and hold the
    most powerful jobs

19
Some questions
  • Should we expect boys and girls to achieve the
    same outcomes in school?
  • With the focus on boys underachievement, what
    about the girls?
  • If achievement gaps between the sexes are long
    established and may be related to innate
    differences, what could (should) schools do about
    it?
  • Which boys and which girls should we be concerned
    about?
  • Does gender deserve the focus it currently
    receives?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com