Title: The Ethics of Clinical Investigation
1The Ethics of Clinical Investigation
- Walter S. Davis, MD
- Center for Biomedical Ethics
- Research Subject Advocate
- General Clinical Research Center
- University of Virginia School of Medicine
2Objectives
- Review the basic tenets of informed consent (IC),
and outline how the concept is different in
research vs. clinical medicine - Explore and discuss the concept of vulnerability
in human subjects research - Discuss the changing role of IRBs in the current
and evolving research ethics climate
3Research Ethics The Historical Perspective
- Code of Nuremburg 1947
- Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Case - 1963
- Beechers NEJM paper - 1966
- Willowbrook State School case revealed - 1970
- Tuskegee Syphilis Study revealed 1972
- National Commission for the Protection of Human
Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
The Belmont Report - 1979 - Jesse Gelsinger 1999
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report
and Recommendations - 2001
4Ethical Challenges for Clinical Research
- Increasing scientific complexity of protocols
- Increasing federal, state, and institutional
oversight of human subjects research - A human subject population living in the
Information Age - Increasing attention to conflicts of interest
5IC is a relatively new concept
- No mention of IC in the Hippocratic Oath
- Beneficence and non-maleficence sufficient
- Implied trustgtimplied consent
- The notion of questioning or refusing treatment
foreign in some cultures - Consent itself was (is) implied in many
traditional societies and cultures
6IC as evolution of pt autonomy
- Respect for pt autonomy was perhaps the most
basic and formative principle of biomedical
ethics, balanced by its counter-principle
physician paternalism - Autonomy-focused bioethics as part of 60s
- Atmosphere of challenge of authority
- The inherent worth of the individual
- Technology with the capacity to extend life in
seriously ill patients
7IC as process, not event
- The process involves information presented in an
interactive educational model, rather than
simple transfer of information - Process requires attention beyond medical facts
of the case - Pts goals and understanding of quality of life
- Pts unique requirements for information
- Pts vulnerability
- Physician more than means of passing along
information
8Doctrine of IC implies a coexisting doctrine of
informed refusal
- A decision to withhold or withdraw treatment is
not, necessarily a negative one - It is virtually impossible for a physician
familiar with a certain treatment to be
completely unbiased - A frank admission and discussion of bias,
experience, and vulnerability from both
patients and physicians is part of the process
9Basic Elements of IC for Research
- Statement that study involves research
- Explanation of purposes of research
- Expected duration of subjects participation
- Description of procedures to be done
- Identification of any procedures that are
experimental
10Basic Elements of IC for Researchcontinued
- Description of risks/benefits
- Disclosure of appropriate alternatives
- Description of how confidentiality will be
protected - Compensation and medical treatment available if
injury/adverse event occurs - Contact information
- Statement that participation is voluntary, and
that non-participation will not have penalty
11Vulnerable Populations the usual suspects
- Children, minors
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- Fetuses
- Cognitively impaired persons
- Economically disadvantaged persons
- Educationally disadvantaged persons
- Military
- Students
- Elderly
- Workers
- Veterans
12Foster et al. (2001) The Lancet 358, 1449-1453
if everyone is vulnerable, no one is entitled
to special protection
13Problems with the Population Model of
Vulnerability (NBAC)
- The list of subparts could get unwieldy
- Unnecessary duplication of regulations
- How do you safeguard persons with multiple
vulnerabilities? - Status of particular groups may change
- Subparts classify certain persons as vulnerable,
rather than situations in which individuals might
be considered vulnerable
14Types of Vulnerability
- Cognitive or communicative
- Institutional
- Deferential
- Medical
- Economic
- Social
15How is the role of IRBs changing with respect to
subject vulnerability?
Two examples
- Report from NHRPAC on Informed Consent and the
Decisionally Impaired - Report from NHRPAC Clarifying Specific Portion of
45 CFR 46 Subpart D that Governs Childrens
Research
16NHRPAC on Decisionally Impaired
recommendations
- research not otherwise approvable may be
conducted after consultation with a panel that
includes both experts in pertinent disciplines
and persons knowledgeable about the experience of
the population with the disorder or condition.. - Independent capacity assessment will likely
become more frequent and important in protection
of cognitively impaired subjects
17NHRPAC on Childrens Research recommendations
- IRB must learn about the populations that will
be potential subjects, taking into account social
and cultural factors that may increase or
decrease the level of risk - procedures should only be performed by
professionals skilled with children - limits on number of attempts at a procedure
- appropriate methods..to orient the child to the
research and decrease potential anxiety and
discomfort
18IC in research as process, not event
- The process involves information presented in an
interactive educational model, rather than
simple transfer of information - Process requires attention beyond medical facts
of the case - Subjects goals and understanding of quality of
life - Subjects unique requirements for information
- Subjects vulnerability
- The Principal Investigator (and/or staff) is more
than the means of passing along information
19The future of clinical investigator training.
- Community consultation skills
- Decisional capacity assessment skills
- Consent conversation skills
- Literacy in the qualitative, behavioral, and
social sciences research on their target
population - Dynamic view of vulnerability