The Ethics of Clinical Investigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Ethics of Clinical Investigation

Description:

General Clinical Research Center. University of Virginia School of Medicine. Objectives. Review the basic tenets of ... Tuskegee Syphilis Study revealed 1972 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: wsd5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Ethics of Clinical Investigation


1
The Ethics of Clinical Investigation
  • Walter S. Davis, MD
  • Center for Biomedical Ethics
  • Research Subject Advocate
  • General Clinical Research Center
  • University of Virginia School of Medicine

2
Objectives
  • Review the basic tenets of informed consent (IC),
    and outline how the concept is different in
    research vs. clinical medicine
  • Explore and discuss the concept of vulnerability
    in human subjects research
  • Discuss the changing role of IRBs in the current
    and evolving research ethics climate

3
Research Ethics The Historical Perspective
  • Code of Nuremburg 1947
  • Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Case - 1963
  • Beechers NEJM paper - 1966
  • Willowbrook State School case revealed - 1970
  • Tuskegee Syphilis Study revealed 1972
  • National Commission for the Protection of Human
    Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
    The Belmont Report - 1979
  • Jesse Gelsinger 1999
  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report
    and Recommendations - 2001

4
Ethical Challenges for Clinical Research
  • Increasing scientific complexity of protocols
  • Increasing federal, state, and institutional
    oversight of human subjects research
  • A human subject population living in the
    Information Age
  • Increasing attention to conflicts of interest

5
IC is a relatively new concept
  • No mention of IC in the Hippocratic Oath
  • Beneficence and non-maleficence sufficient
  • Implied trustgtimplied consent
  • The notion of questioning or refusing treatment
    foreign in some cultures
  • Consent itself was (is) implied in many
    traditional societies and cultures

6
IC as evolution of pt autonomy
  • Respect for pt autonomy was perhaps the most
    basic and formative principle of biomedical
    ethics, balanced by its counter-principle
    physician paternalism
  • Autonomy-focused bioethics as part of 60s
  • Atmosphere of challenge of authority
  • The inherent worth of the individual
  • Technology with the capacity to extend life in
    seriously ill patients

7
IC as process, not event
  • The process involves information presented in an
    interactive educational model, rather than
    simple transfer of information
  • Process requires attention beyond medical facts
    of the case
  • Pts goals and understanding of quality of life
  • Pts unique requirements for information
  • Pts vulnerability
  • Physician more than means of passing along
    information

8
Doctrine of IC implies a coexisting doctrine of
informed refusal
  • A decision to withhold or withdraw treatment is
    not, necessarily a negative one
  • It is virtually impossible for a physician
    familiar with a certain treatment to be
    completely unbiased
  • A frank admission and discussion of bias,
    experience, and vulnerability from both
    patients and physicians is part of the process

9
Basic Elements of IC for Research
  • Statement that study involves research
  • Explanation of purposes of research
  • Expected duration of subjects participation
  • Description of procedures to be done
  • Identification of any procedures that are
    experimental

10
Basic Elements of IC for Researchcontinued
  • Description of risks/benefits
  • Disclosure of appropriate alternatives
  • Description of how confidentiality will be
    protected
  • Compensation and medical treatment available if
    injury/adverse event occurs
  • Contact information
  • Statement that participation is voluntary, and
    that non-participation will not have penalty

11
Vulnerable Populations the usual suspects
  • Children, minors
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Fetuses
  • Cognitively impaired persons
  • Economically disadvantaged persons
  • Educationally disadvantaged persons
  • Military
  • Students
  • Elderly
  • Workers
  • Veterans

12
Foster et al. (2001) The Lancet 358, 1449-1453
if everyone is vulnerable, no one is entitled
to special protection
13
Problems with the Population Model of
Vulnerability (NBAC)
  • The list of subparts could get unwieldy
  • Unnecessary duplication of regulations
  • How do you safeguard persons with multiple
    vulnerabilities?
  • Status of particular groups may change
  • Subparts classify certain persons as vulnerable,
    rather than situations in which individuals might
    be considered vulnerable

14
Types of Vulnerability
  • Cognitive or communicative
  • Institutional
  • Deferential
  • Medical
  • Economic
  • Social

15
How is the role of IRBs changing with respect to
subject vulnerability?
Two examples
  • Report from NHRPAC on Informed Consent and the
    Decisionally Impaired
  • Report from NHRPAC Clarifying Specific Portion of
    45 CFR 46 Subpart D that Governs Childrens
    Research

16
NHRPAC on Decisionally Impaired
recommendations
  • research not otherwise approvable may be
    conducted after consultation with a panel that
    includes both experts in pertinent disciplines
    and persons knowledgeable about the experience of
    the population with the disorder or condition..
  • Independent capacity assessment will likely
    become more frequent and important in protection
    of cognitively impaired subjects

17
NHRPAC on Childrens Research recommendations
  • IRB must learn about the populations that will
    be potential subjects, taking into account social
    and cultural factors that may increase or
    decrease the level of risk
  • procedures should only be performed by
    professionals skilled with children
  • limits on number of attempts at a procedure
  • appropriate methods..to orient the child to the
    research and decrease potential anxiety and
    discomfort

18
IC in research as process, not event
  • The process involves information presented in an
    interactive educational model, rather than
    simple transfer of information
  • Process requires attention beyond medical facts
    of the case
  • Subjects goals and understanding of quality of
    life
  • Subjects unique requirements for information
  • Subjects vulnerability
  • The Principal Investigator (and/or staff) is more
    than the means of passing along information

19
The future of clinical investigator training.
  • Community consultation skills
  • Decisional capacity assessment skills
  • Consent conversation skills
  • Literacy in the qualitative, behavioral, and
    social sciences research on their target
    population
  • Dynamic view of vulnerability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com