CM/GC Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

CM/GC Overview

Description:

SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to independently manage a ... ENDS IN HEADWALL. HEADWALL LABYRINTH. BEAM TRANSPORT HALL. David Saenz. CM/GC Overview ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: hel85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CM/GC Overview


1
CM/GC Overview
  • CM/GC Plan Status
  • Systems Description
  • Cost Estimate
  • Construction Schedule
  • Risks and Challenges
  • Summary

2
CM/GC Plan
  • Why do we need a CMGC (Construction Manager
    General Contractor)
  • SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to
    independently manage a project of this magnitude

3
CM/GC Plan
  • SOW for CM/GC has been developed and continues to
    have the highest priority in the CF group as
    largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS
    project
  • Currently being reviewed by SLAC SO DOE
  • Comments being updated as we speak
  • Once approved by SLAC SO DOE, the plan is to
    submit to DOE Headquarters for approval (Chicago
    ? DC)
  • Once plan is approved, there will not be a need
    to go back for multiple review and approval of
    bid packages

4
CM/GC Plan contd
Advertisement placed in construction periodical
ENR Magazine Jan/Feb
  • Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) has been written
    and continues to be updated as necessary (signed
    copy on LCLS website)

Meeting planned Milestones are crucial!
5
CM/GC Plan contd
  • CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed
    price contracts
  • Phase 1 preconstruction services
  • Phase 2 construction services of underground
    and major excavation effort, and construction
    services of above ground buildings
  • CM/GC Award 6/30/05
  • CM/GC qualifications partial list
  • Technical competence
  • Similar previous experience
  • Successful history using second and third tier
    subcontractors
  • Financial strength

6
CM/GC Plan contd
  • Outstanding safety record
  • Experience Modification Rate (EMR) lt.81
  • EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury
    claims that are considered average among their
    industry group
  • EMR gt 1.0 indicated that the company files more
    claims than other similar companies
  • EMRlt0.81 indicates that the company had filed
    fewer claims than those compared against similar
    companies
  • Injury frequency and severity rates
  • Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the
    key personnel
  • OSHA citation history
  • References from previous projects
  • Evaluation of the contractors integration of
    safety into their work practices

LCLS has decided to place all contractors working
on projects to have an EMR of lt.81, go no-go
7
CMGC P3 Schedule
8
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort
  • Phase 1 preconstruction activities to include
  • Provide effective overlap period and oversight of
    effort during Title II
  • Estimates during Title II
  • CPM Schedule
  • Identify lead-time for critical items
  • Design coordination
  • Constructability reviews
  • Value Engineering reviews
  • Site investigation

9
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort contd
  • Develop Project Management Plan (PMP)
  • Construction Management Plan outlines project
    scope, organization, and specific approach to
    accomplish project
  • Project Safety Plan project specific
    identifying job hazards, safety performance and
    individuals responsible for project safety
  • Procurement Plan identifies systems, methods
    and procedures for solicitation to subcontractors
  • Quality Control and Assurance Plan method of
    controlling time, cost and quality of various
    management tasks specific to the project

10
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort contd
  • Develop construction bid packages
  • Develop list and contact potential bidders
  • Develop prequalification criteria
  • Solicit bids
  • Recommend award to SLAC for approval of
    subcontractor
  • Award contract to subcontractors

11
CM/GC Phase 2 Effort
  • Phase 2 CM/GC shall provide all materials,
    labor, and services required to construct the
    Project
  • All general conditions including field personnel,
    office staff, temporary offices, temporary
    construction, safety implementation, construction
    equipment, coordination of all subs, project
    administration, construction waste management,
    commissioning

12
Below Grade Plan
Beam Transport Hall
Near Hall
Undulator Hall
XRTDT
Far Hall
13
New Facilities (below grade)
Beam Transport Hall 227m long above grade
facility to transport the electron beam through
the existing RSY
Central Lab Office Complex office facility to
house 300 LCLS researchers, engineers,
technicians, administrative staff and visiting
experimentalists
Undulator Hall 175m long underground tunnel
housing undulators and ancillary equipment
Far Experimental Hall underground
cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches,
prep and shop space
Electron Beam Dump 40m long underground
facility used to separate the electron and x-ray
beams
Front End Enclosure 30m long underground
facility to house various diagnostic equipment in
support of the photon beam
Near Experimental Hall underground facility
whose primary function is to house 3 experimental
hutches, prep and shops
X-Ray Transport Diagnostics Tunnel 250m long
underground tunnel used to transport photon beams
from NEH to FEH
14
LCLS Site Plan
Spear
Future Office Space
Pep Ring Road
SLC
Office Complex
Undulator Hall
Research Yard
Survey Tower
NEH
Beam Transport Hall
SLC Tunnel
Beam Dump Front End Enclosure
Future Beam Lines
X-Ray Transport
Pep Tunnel
15
  • IN RESEARCH YARD
  • 227 M LONG
  • 15 x 14-9 (W x H)
  • 63 M HEADHOUSE
  • 72 THICK WALLS
  • 48 THICK CEILING
  • 3 SERVICE AREAS
  • ENDS IN HEADWALL
  • HEADWALL LABYRINTH

16
  • UNDER HILL
  • 175 M LONG
  • 21-11 x 14-6 (W x H)
  • 33 UNDULATORS
  • HEAVY GRANITE SLABS
  • MONOLITHIC FLOOR
  • THERMAL BARRIERS

17
  • UNDER PEP RING RD.
  • 40 M LONG
  • 15 x 12-6 (W x H)
  • CAST-IN-PLACE
  • GROOVED FLOORS
  • E-BEAM DIPS DOWN
  • HEAVY METAL SHEILD

18
  • EAST OF BEAM DUMP
  • 29 M LONG
  • BETWEEN SHEILDS
  • 15 x 12-6 (W x H)
  • CAST-IN-PLACE
  • NUMEROUS EQUIP.

19
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
  • EAST OF FEE
  • 39 M LONG
  • 2 FLOORS
  • 3 HUTCHES
  • LASER BAY (ABOVE)
  • CLOC FACILITY ABOVE
  • PREP CONTROL AREA
  • FREIGHT ELEVATOR
  • CUT FILL TECHNIQUE

20
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
  • WITHIN NEH
  • TOTAL 3 (CURRENT)
  • ANOTHER 3 (FUTURE)
  • 10 M x 10 M
  • SHEILDING NEEDED
  • HEAVY SLIDING DOOR

21
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL
  • EAST OF NEH
  • 250 M LONG
  • 18 WIDE CONSTANT
  • BEAM SPLITS IN THREE
  • LABYRINTH TO FEH
  • WALKWAY ALONG BEAM

22
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
  • END OF X-RAY TUNNEL
  • 29 M LONG
  • 2 CAVERN/TUNNELS
  • 31 x 21 (W x H)
  • CONNECTING TUNNELS
  • OFFICES IN EXTENDED CAVERN
  • ACCESS TUNNEL

23
CLOC Floor Plans
CLOC Exterior Elevations
  • Headcount of CLOC Personnel 284
  • Capacity of Conf Center 150
  • Gross square footage of CLOC (offices and labs)
    68,800sf

24
CLOC Exterior Elevations
25
CLOC Exterior Elevations
26
CF FY Total Estimated Cost
CMGC is responsible for 500K for Phase I (Award
CMGC thru March 06) and 59.5M for Phase II (Mar
06 thru 08)
27
LCLS CF Construction Schedule
  • Added additional time for CM/GC procurement
    phase
  • DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor bidding phase
  • Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months
    duration
  • Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical
    system interfaces
  • Site-work at NEH is key!

28
Title-II Draft Schedule
Interactive Planning session is scheduled for
April 13,14
(6/05) CMGC has real value added input early
during design phase
This is essentially JE 100 stage
29
Risks and Challenges
  • Construction Safety
  • All construction activities to comply with
    Federal and State environmental, safety, health
    and building codes
  • Subcontractor activities
  • In-house activities
  • SLAC will approve construction safety program
    prior to start of construction
  • Enhanced construction program is a must
  • Special consideration is being addressed
  • Tunnel construction
  • RSY due to the congestion in the area

30
Risks and Challenges contd
  • Bay area construction market
  • Materials
  • Labor
  • Schedule concerns
  • Annual lab shut-down periods
  • Schedule for site characterization remediation
  • FFTB decommissioning
  • On-site support

31
Summary
  • Confidence is high for the successful
    implementation of the model chosen as it has
    already been proved at LBNL Molecular Foundry
  • CMGC holds the paper
  • Actual cost will be determined by competitive
    bids from subcontractors
  • Total estimated pricing established by SLAC

32
  • End of presentation

33
Additional data
  • All subcontractor bids and award of contracts
    will be pre-approved by SLAC
  • Subcontractor bid award amounts added to CM/GC
    contract
  • Technical Documents
  • CM/GC Statement of Work
  • General Requirements (01010)
  • Special Requirements (01210)
  • Schedules (01325)
  • Construction Waste Management (01570)
  • Schedule of Performance Milestones
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com