Title: A Complex Systems Study of the Implications of Anthropogenic Perturbations of the Global Biogeochemi
1A Complex Systems Study of the Implications of
Anthropogenic Perturbations of the Global
Biogeochemical CyclesA PhD
Presentation by Nicola Smith23 May 2008
2During the 20th century the worlds population
quadrupled, the global economy expanded 14-fold,
energy use increased 16 times, and the control
of world biomass increased to about 40 percent
3Overview of Presentation
- Describe research topic and key aims
- Provide context to the proposed research a
summary of five existing contributions - Propose a broad conceptual framework
- Describe the economic components of the research
- Summary of key challenges
4Overview of Research
- Key task is to develop an integrated model of the
Earth system that captures insights from both the
natural and social sciences - Focus is on
- Natural systems - biogeochemical cycles
- Socio-economic systems - economy, demographics
- The interactions within and between these
components - Research will pick up on contributions already
made by Murray Patterson and Garry McDonald - Research will be undertaken at a global level
5Key Research Aims
- To develop a method for modelling the world
economy as it is embedded within the global
biogeochemical cycles, that - Achieves a high level of integration of natural
and human components - Captures important feedbacks, non-linearities and
lags - To identify the anthropogenic disturbance regimes
and perturbations that matter at the global level - The human mind is not well-adapted to
interpreting the behaviour of our complex earth
system characterised by multiple non-linear
feedbacks Jay Forrester - To identify sustainable pathways for the global
economy
6What are Sustainable Pathways?
- A steady state economy - in terms of physical
input and output - Minimizing energy throughput (entropy law)
- A sustainable economy is one characterised by
minimized and consistent physical exchanges
between human society and the environment, with
internal material loops driven by renewable
energy - Maintaining a constant stock of (natural) capital
(some natural capital is critical) - Maintain life-support services and assimilative
capacity of the environment - Ensuring the Earth system does not transcend to a
new stable state
7Overview of Other Models
- Integrated global modelling originates from the
1970s with the World2 and World3 models - Nearly all models begin with a strong emphasis on
either natural or human parts of the earth system
truly integrated models still rare - Five models have been selected for review to help
provide a context to the proposed research - Mackenzie, GBCM, World Model, GUMBO and TARGETS
8Mackenzie Model
- Mackenzie et al. (1993)
- Strengths
- Attempt to integrate biogeochemical cycles (C, N
and P) at a global level - Relatively simple and easy to understand
- Limitations
- Few connections and feedbacks between cycles
- Largely driven by perturbations in P cycle only
- Almost every process controlled by first order
rate equation - eg
-
fAO flux of C from atmosphere to ocean, k
constant, A C stock in atmosphere
9Global Biogeochemical Cycling Model (GBCM)
- Strengths
- Very high degree of integration and feedback
between the biogeochemical cycles - eg phytoplankton N fixation
- Limitations
- Every process driven by a selected donor stock
- Does not include anthropogenic processes
C cycle
H cycle
P cycle
S cycle
N cycle
10GBCM Example of CO2 Increase
My model will extend the stoichiometric approach
to the economy
11Leontiefs World Model
- What is input-output analysis?
- Allows for easy consideration of economy
structure, direct indirect effects, industrial
metabolism
12Leontiefs World Model (continued)
- First created by Leontief colleagues in mid
1970s - Extended in other studies eg Duchin and Lange
(1994) - Strengths
- Describes economy with high level of detail (c50
sectors, 16 regions) - Recognises the industrial metabolism of the
economy (6 resource inputs and 3 residuals) - Limitations
- Mostly linear relationships, few feedbacks
- No internal description of natural systems
- Highlights the difficulty of technology change
13GUMBO Model
- Connects social, economic and biophysical systems
- Focus is on ecosystem services
- Strengths
- Many aspects of the Earth system included
- C, N and H2O cycles, climate, capital formation,
GWP, land use, energy use, population - Recognises the industrial metabolism of economy
- Considers role of the natural systems in economic
growth - Limitations
- Entire economy aggregated to 1 sector
-
14TARGETS Framework
15TARGETS Framework (continued)
- Strengths
- Extensive coverage of the Earth system
- C, N, S, P hydrological cycles, climate,
agriculture, land use change, energy use,
population, health - Some feedbacks from environment to socio-economic
systems - eg impact of CO2 fertilization on agricultural
production - Incorporation of cultural dimensions
- Limitations
- Complexity has led to a loss of transparency
- Limited representation of the economy, only 2
sectors industries and services (but sub-models
for agriculture and energy)
16Summary
17(No Transcript)
18The Economic System (static)
- Starting point is monetary input-output table
- Next step is to extend the framework to a static
model of mass and energy flows - Like other physical input-output tables this
will - Account for the metabolism of the economy
- Recognize the law of conservation of mass
- The model will be unique as materials will be
recorded as biogeochemical species
19The Economic System (static, continued)
20The Economic System (dynamic)
- A particularly challenging component of the
research - Key factors to consider
- Population change
- Change in capital
- Technology change
- Feedbacks from the environment
- No existing modeling approach entirely
satisfactory
21Modelling Economic Dynamics
- Scenario-Based
- How do we incorporate feedbacks?
- CGE Models
- Assumption of equilibrium
22Conclusion Key Challenges
- Breadth of topic
- Scale and aggregation
- How do we model dynamic growth of the economy?
- How do we incorporate technological change?
- Complexity and comprehensiveness vs easily
digestible outputs