New Results from the STAR Experiment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

New Results from the STAR Experiment

Description:

New Results from the STAR Experiment – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: markusdo5
Category:
Tags: star | experiment | new | onig | results

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Results from the STAR Experiment


1
New Results from the STAR Experiment
  • Markus Oldenburg
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • High-Energy Physics Seminar
  • University of Toronto

November 15, 2005
2
Overview
  • The STAR Experiment at RHIC
  • Physics
  • I High-pT Measurements
  • Modification of Jet Fragmentation
  • II Low-pT Results
  • Radial and Anisotropic Flow
  • Anisotropic Flow of Strange Hadrons
  • The Future of STAR
  • III Detector Upgrades
  • The Heavy-Flavor Tracker
  • Summary

3
The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
  • two independent accelerator rings
  • 3.83 km in circumference
  • accelerates everything from p to Au
  • running conditions so far
  • AuAu _at_ 20 GeV
  • AuAu _at_ 62.4 GeV
  • AuAu _at_ 130 GeV
  • AuAu _at_ 200 GeV
  • CuCu _at_ 62.4 GeV
  • CuCu _at_ 200 GeV
  • dAu _at_ 200 GeV
  • p?p? _at_ 200 GeV
  • p?p? _at_ 400 GeV

Long Island
4
The STAR Experiment at RHIC
5
One of the first Au on Au Events at CM Energy of
200 GeV?A
6
Timeline of a Heavy-Ion Collision
II
I
by S. Bass
7
Jets in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions
I
AuAu ???? (STAR_at_RHIC)
pp ?jetjet (STAR_at_RHIC)
8
Evolution of ?? correlations at RHIC
?? correlations
Associated
  • Trigger-associated technique valuable for
    tagging jets in high-multiplicity environment
    (vs. jet-cone algorithms)
  • Probes the jets interaction with the QCD medium
  • Provides stringent test of energy-loss models

Associated
9
Probing fragmentation region with pT?
  • How does ?? correlation evolve with increasing
    pT?
  • Does away-side jet punch through?
  • Is the fragmentation modified? If so, how?
  • Does away-side suppression disappear at very high
    pT?
  • Successful RHIC Run 4 (2004) ? 10x more
    central, minbias AuAu
  • STAR event reconstruction ongoing
  • Raising pT thresholds allows to
  • Extend into fragmentation region
  • Significantly reduce uncorrelated background,
    relative event shape (v2) contribution
  • Look for leading away-side hadrons

10
Emergence of dijets with increasing pT(trig)
  • ?? correlations (not background subtracted)

AuAu, 0-5 most central
  • Hint of narrow back-to-back peak for higher
    pT(trig)
  • Higher pT(trig) reflects higher-Q2 hard scattering

11
The beginnings of dijet tomography
  • ?? correlations (not background subtracted)
  • Narrow peak emerges cleanly above vanishing
    background.
  • Near-side peak (??0) gets narrower for higher
    pT(assoc).
  • Harder fragments are more closely aligned with
    jet direction.

preliminary
8 lt pT(trig) lt 15 GeV/c
12
Characterization of recoiling jet
First differential measurement of energy loss
dN/dzT
by D. Magestro
dN/dzT hadron triggered fragmentation
function (X.-N. Wang) works without direct
knowledge of parton energy
10-1
0.54
  • Recoil yield is suppressedIAA 0.25 RAA
    (central collisions)
  • Fragmentation distribution essentially unchanged
    (zTgt0.4)

0.25
8 lt pT(trig) lt 15 GeV/c
STAR preliminary
13
Comparison to a theoretical prediction
X-N Wang, PLB 595 (2004) 165
  • X.-N. Wang Away-side fragmentation altered
    relative to pp due to partonic energy loss in
    the medium
  • drops steeply until zT0.4
  • roughly constant above zT0.5
  • STAR data is lower than the prediction.

14
Hadron Spectra from RHICmid-rapidity, pp and
AuAu collisions at 200 GeV
II
5 10-20 20-40 40-60 60-80
centrality
Data from BRAHMS, PHENIX, and STAR.
15
Transverse Radial Flow
AuAu at 200 GeV
? -
STAR Preliminary
K -
?p
  • Slopes decrease with mass.
  • ?pT? and the effective temperature increase with
    mass.

16
Radial Flow of Different Hadron Species
  • freeze-out of multi-strange hadrons
  • - at higher
  • temperature Tfo
  • - with lower
  • collective
  • velocity ??T?
  • small cross section of strange hadrons with
    non-strange hadrons
  • sensitivity to the early, partonic stage

Results from Blast-wave fits
STAR
Nucl. Phys. A715, 458c (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett.
92, 112301 (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 182301
(2004)
17
Anisotropic Flow vn
  • non-central collisions azimuthal anisotropy in
    coordinate-space
  • interactions ? asymmetry in momentum-space
  • sensitive to early time in the systems evolution
  • Measurement Fourier expansion of the azimuthal
    pT distribution

18
v2 at low pT
min. bias
simulations P. Huovinen, private communications,
2004
  • At low pT hydro model results fit mass hierarchy
    well!
  • - Differences in the details

19
v2 of identified hadrons up to pT 9 GeV/c
PHENIX (open symbols) Phys. Rev. Lett. 91,
182301 (2003)
200 GeV AuAu
  • saturation and onset of decline at pT gt 3 GeV/c
  • clear meson?baryon scaling at intermediate pT
  • scaling extends out to high pT

20
Number-of-Constituent Quark-Scaling of v2
  • scaled meson and baryon v2 agrees at intermediate
    pT
  • high statistics measurements show deviation from
    ideal scaling

200 GeV AuAu
STAR preliminary
PHENIX (open symbols) Phys. Rev. Lett. 91,
182301 (2003)
21
Importance of v2 of the ? meson
STAR Phys. Rev. C65, 041901(R) (02) Phys.
Lett. B612, 181 (2005)
Kaon coalescence effectively ruled out as a
dominant channel for ? production at these
energies.
  • ? is a true signal from the early stage of the
    collision!
  • anisotropic flow measurement of ? will conclude
  • type of the system at an early stage
  • partonic vs. hadronic
  • origin of observed scaling at intermediate pT
  • mass vs. particle type

22
Particle identification and mass spectra
  • ?
  • identified via decay topology
  • ? K K-
  • background estimation by event mixing
  • gt 10,000,000 particles identified

O- and (anti-O) identified via decay
topology ? ? ? K and ? ? p ? background
estimated by rotating the ? by 180 in the
transverse plane gt 13,000 particles identified
?- and (anti- ?) identified via decay
topology ? ? ? ? and ? ? p ? background
estimated by rotating the ? by 180 in the
transverse plane gt 450,000 particles identified
? results by Sarah Blyth
23
v2 of multi-strange hadrons
_
  • common fit to K and ?
  • n number of constituent quarks
  • X. Dong et al.,
  • Phys. Lett. B597 (2004)

v2
?? OO ?
_
baryons
mesons
pT/n gt 0.75 GeV/c ?2/ndf for NCQ2 ?2/ndf for NCQ3
?? 82.7/6 27.4/6
OO 4.1/3 2.1/3
? 2.0/5 7.4/5
_
200 GeV AuAu
_
? results by Sarah Blyth
24
Discussion of strange hadron v2 results
K0S and ? results by Yan Lu
STAR preliminary
? results by Sarah Blyth
Hydro P. Huovinen, priv. comm. (2004)
  • ? flows as strongly as other mesons.
  • Collective flow is generated during the partonic
    stage already.
  • The strange baryons ? and O show strong elliptic
    flow.
  • The ? v2 clearly follows the baryon v2(pT).

25
Conclusions from the low-pT results
  • Collectivity develops early among partons!
  • Partonic Collectivity at RHIC

26
Timeline of a Heavy-Ion Collision
III
by S. Bass
27
Heavy-Flavor Quarks
B. Mueller, nucl-th/0404015.
  • Even in a QGP with chiral restoration, the c, b
    (and t) quarks stay heavy.
  • If charm quarks show collective behavior ( flow)
    the must have suffered frequent interactions with
    the light quarks u, d, s.
  • The light quarks u, d, s must be thermalized.

28
Charm Elliptic Flow via the electron channel
  • D ? e X
  • Sizeable elliptic flow
  • But large background ? ? ee- ?0 ? ee- ?
    ...? large stat. and syst. uncertainties
  • ? Need direct open charm reconstruction!

M. Kaneta (PHENIX), J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys.
30, S1217 (2004). F. Laue et al. (STAR), J. Phys.
G Nucl. Part. Phys. 31, S27 (2005).
29
Open Charm Flow
  • Two extreme scenarios
  • (a) No charm quark flow (PYTHIA)
  • (b) Charm quark flow (Hydro)
  • ? Differences in D-meson spectra 30 at pT lt 2.0
    GeV/c
  • D ? e X electron spectra indistinguishable!
  • Electron spectrum contains no information on
    dynamics
  • Need direct open charm reconstruction to low pT!

S. Batsouli et al., Phys. Lett. B 557 (2003) 26.
30
A Heavy-Flavor Tracker for STAR
  • D0 ? K p, c? 1.23 cm? need precise tracking
    device
  • Two layers r 1.5, 5.0 cm
  • 24 ladders
  • 2 cm by 20 cm
  • CMOS Sensors (monolithic)
  • 100M pixels total , 100 k/cm2
  • precise (lt10 µm)
  • thin and low power
  • 50 µm thick chip air cooling
  • 0.36 radiation length
  • Low power budget 100 mW/cm2

31
The Heavy-Flavor Tracker in STAR
Heavy-Flavor Tracker
Magnet
Coils
E-M Calorimeter
Time Projection Chamber
Trigger Barrel
Electronics Platforms
Forward Time Projection Chamber
32
Summary
  • High-pT physics
  • Jet fragmentation is modified by the medium.
  • Higher statistics allows for quantitative
    measurements.
  • Model comparisons involving partonic energy loss
    are in qualitative agreement with the data.
  • Low and intermediate pT region
  • Hydro models describe the data well at low pT.
  • At intermediate pT NCQ scaling is observed
  • (and deviations of the ideal scaling as well).
  • ?, ?, and ? behave like other mesons and baryons.
  • Flow develops during a partonic stage of the
    system!
  • Detector upgrades
  • STAR aims to build a new silicon tracker based on
    CMOS pixel technology for direct D reconstruction
    to answer the question of the systems
    thermalization.

33
The Heavy-Flavor Tracker in STAR
Heavy-Flavor Tracker
Magnet
Coils
E-M Calorimeter
Time Projection Chamber
Trigger Barrel
Electronics Platforms
Forward Time Projection Chamber
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com