FM ILT Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration Status Report H. Feuchtgruber, R. Vavrek PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 19
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FM ILT Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration Status Report H. Feuchtgruber, R. Vavrek


1
FM ILT Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration
Status ReportH. Feuchtgruber, R. Vavrek
2
Overview of Measurements (1)
  • Nov/Dec 2006 FMILT1
  • - 2 short scans of water vapour cell and few
    laser lines
  • measured (initial calibration done, report
    available)
  • Mar 2007 FM ILT2
  • - Measured FIR-Laser lines µm (5 days)
  • - CH3OH 70.511638, 77.405660, 96.522408,
    118.834107,
  • 163.03352, 170.57637 x 5 chopper angles
  • - 13CH3OH 115.82324, 203.63577 x 5 chopper
    angles
  • - CH318OH 134.6-0.1, 162.647, 219.801 x 5
    chopper angles
  • - Gas cell measurements (with Kapton foil)
  • - H2O (27 hours)
  • One Measurement consists of full scan
    vapour full scan vacuum
  • Filter A (C0.1pF(blue), 1pF(red) x 3
    chopper angles
  • Filter B (C0.1pF(blue), 0.2pF(red) x
    3 chopper angles
  • - CO (3 hours)
  • Grating range scan pair vacuum CO gas at
    1 chopper angle

3
Overview of Measurements (2)
  • June 2007 FMILT3
  • Gas cell measurements (without Kapton foil)
  • - H2O (9 hours)
  • One Measurement consists of full scan
    vapour full scan vacuum
  • Filter A (C0.1pF(blue), 1pF(red) x 1
    chopper angle
  • Filter B (C0.1pF(blue), 0.2pF(red) x 1
    chopper angle

4
FIR Laser Setup
  • TUFIR window
  • Extended, but structured source
  • with substantial contrast
  • Substantial laser power variation
  • (recorded within setup)
  • Scan parameters
  • Range 100-120 steps (updown)
  • Stepsize 100
  • Readouts per ramp 64
  • Ramps per position 3

5
Gas Absorption Setup
  • Focus window
  • Extended and controlled background source
  • Source T600C (H2O) and T400C (CO)
  • Absorption path 56cm
  • p 9mBar (H2O) and p70mBar (CO)
  • Scan parameters
  • - Range 32000-1064000
  • - Stepsize 200
  • - Readouts per ramp 64
  • - Readouts per position 3

6
Calibration Method (1)
?? ????0.6253 gLHe117.175µm n1,2,3
pix1..16
? ?0 (p1-1)(gratpos/dgrat)
p2(gratpos/dgrat)2 p3(gratpos/dgrat)3 with
dgrat 23301 steps/?
dpixn constant(n) n1,2,3,2
7
Calibration Method (2)
  • Begin with calibration from FILT1 (few lines
    measured only)
  • Calculate up/down corrected and divided spectra
    (gas/vacuum) for each pixel
  • Fforeground(?) Tgas(?)Fbackground(?)
  • Ratio
  • Fforeground(?)
    Fbackground(?)
  • with Fforeground (?) ? (2050) x Fbackground
    (?)
  • Calculate model spectra (at expected PACS
    spectral resolution) for the wavelength range
    under investigation and define spectral intervals
    for correlation analysis
  • Determine ?-calibration offsets for each interval
  • Store 3rd order polynomial parameters fitted to
    offsets vs. (gratpos/dgrat) for each pixel
  • ?new ?old polynomial fit
  • Iterate previous steps (at least twice)

8
Results
  • A semi-automatic method to calibrate each pixel
    in each array is now available
  • ?-calibration 3rd order polynomials for all
    individual spectrometer pixels have been derived
  • Separate sets of polynomials have been calculated
    for the 3 main PACS spectrometer bands and the
    extra band (2nd order via filter A 54-73µm)
  • CO line positions are compliant with calibration
    based on water
  • Laser positions largely compliant with
    calibration, however few
  • single pixels show still some significant
    deviations ? still to be corrected in a case by
    case analysis
  • Laser lines may show peak-center variations due
    to actual position of laser spots within the
    slit.
  • This is the initial uplink calibration for flight

9
Data Quality (1)
single pixel
Typical data used during correlation analysis
10
Data Quality (2)
single pixel
rebinned module
11
Accuracies
  • PCD V8.0 (sec. 4.2.1)
  • Required accuracy
  • Peak position to within 10-20 of a spectral
    resolution element
  • In general the requirement is met throughout all
    bands however at band borders, due to leakage
    effects and lower S/N the calibration accuracy
    (in terms of s over all pixels) is closer to 20
    of a spectral resolution element, while in band
    centers, s values even better than 10 are
    obtained.
  • sstdev(all_pixels residual ?-shift vs. model)
  • Absolute verification against Laser and CO lines
  • Relative verification by combining all pixels
  • Be aware relative position of point sources
    within slit can have significant effect

12
Remarks
  • Depth of grating scans (normalized to line
  • scan AOT)3rd order (2.5h), 2nd order (2.5h),
  • 2nd order (2.8h),1st order (3.6h)
  • (time1st 58steps 0.75sec 2updown
    3numres
  • 2vapvac 25modules / 3600sec)
  • HDO lines are detected (abundance 3e-4 partial
  • pressure 2.7e-6 bar)
  • CO spectra show residual lines from water
    contamination

Faintest lines 3e-18W/m2
n3, 2
n2
n1
C1pF
C0.2pF
C0.1pF
Leak models
13
Remarks
  • Depth of grating scans (normalized to line scan
    AOT)3rd order (2.5h), 2nd order (2.5h),
  • 2nd order (2.8h),1st order (3.6h)
  • (time1st 58steps 0.75s 2updown 3numres
    2vapvac 25modules / 3600s)
  • HDO lines are detected (abundance 3e-4 partial
    pressure 2.7e-6 bar)
  • CO spectra show residual lines from water
    contamination

Faintest lines 3e-18W/m2
14
(No Transcript)
15
Expected Line centers and slit widths overplotted
Verification with Laser Lines
16
Next Steps / Open Work
  • Investigate/recalibrate few outlying pixels found
    during verification against Laser lines. The
    reason is essentially the poor S/N in the
    measurements during FM ILT 2.
  • Calibrate L/L chopper throws, spot checks
    indicate that there is no significant change in
    calibration
  • Provide Report and Calfiles (version as of this
    report provided for PACS spectrometer pipeline)
  • Check calibration and eventually recalibrate for
    FMILT 3 measurements

17
Instrumental Profile (1)
  • For more details see report by R. Vavrek

18
Instrumental Profile (2)
19
Wavelength Calibration in Flight (1)
  • Observing modes
  • Use standard SpecRangeScan AOT
  • Use Wave_Cal mode with pointing request
  • Suitable target list
  • - PICC-ME-TN-013, Use of late type stars for
    PACS wavelength calibration, (D. Lutz)
  • Photometric and Spectroscopic Calibration of
    Herschel Instruments with Planets and
    Satellites, (Th. Encrenaz, R. Moreno, A.
    Coustenis)
  • Uranus(H2O), Neptune(H2O, CO), Saturn(H2O, NH3,
    PH3)
  • Jupiter (H2O, NH3, PH3 fills entire 5x5 field
    of view !)

20
Wavelength Calibration in Flight (2)
Start PV
Start Routine Ops
Target visibilities (HSPOT)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com