Title: FM ILT Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration Status Report H. Feuchtgruber, R. Vavrek
1FM ILT Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration
Status ReportH. Feuchtgruber, R. Vavrek
2Overview of Measurements (1)
- Nov/Dec 2006 FMILT1
- - 2 short scans of water vapour cell and few
laser lines - measured (initial calibration done, report
available) - Mar 2007 FM ILT2
- - Measured FIR-Laser lines µm (5 days)
- - CH3OH 70.511638, 77.405660, 96.522408,
118.834107, - 163.03352, 170.57637 x 5 chopper angles
- - 13CH3OH 115.82324, 203.63577 x 5 chopper
angles - - CH318OH 134.6-0.1, 162.647, 219.801 x 5
chopper angles - - Gas cell measurements (with Kapton foil)
- - H2O (27 hours)
- One Measurement consists of full scan
vapour full scan vacuum - Filter A (C0.1pF(blue), 1pF(red) x 3
chopper angles - Filter B (C0.1pF(blue), 0.2pF(red) x
3 chopper angles - - CO (3 hours)
- Grating range scan pair vacuum CO gas at
1 chopper angle
3Overview of Measurements (2)
- June 2007 FMILT3
- Gas cell measurements (without Kapton foil)
- - H2O (9 hours)
- One Measurement consists of full scan
vapour full scan vacuum - Filter A (C0.1pF(blue), 1pF(red) x 1
chopper angle - Filter B (C0.1pF(blue), 0.2pF(red) x 1
chopper angle
4FIR Laser Setup
- TUFIR window
- Extended, but structured source
- with substantial contrast
- Substantial laser power variation
- (recorded within setup)
- Scan parameters
- Range 100-120 steps (updown)
- Stepsize 100
- Readouts per ramp 64
- Ramps per position 3
-
5Gas Absorption Setup
- Focus window
- Extended and controlled background source
- Source T600C (H2O) and T400C (CO)
- Absorption path 56cm
- p 9mBar (H2O) and p70mBar (CO)
- Scan parameters
- - Range 32000-1064000
- - Stepsize 200
- - Readouts per ramp 64
- - Readouts per position 3
-
6Calibration Method (1)
?? ????0.6253 gLHe117.175µm n1,2,3
pix1..16
? ?0 (p1-1)(gratpos/dgrat)
p2(gratpos/dgrat)2 p3(gratpos/dgrat)3 with
dgrat 23301 steps/?
dpixn constant(n) n1,2,3,2
7Calibration Method (2)
- Begin with calibration from FILT1 (few lines
measured only) - Calculate up/down corrected and divided spectra
(gas/vacuum) for each pixel - Fforeground(?) Tgas(?)Fbackground(?)
- Ratio
- Fforeground(?)
Fbackground(?) - with Fforeground (?) ? (2050) x Fbackground
(?) - Calculate model spectra (at expected PACS
spectral resolution) for the wavelength range
under investigation and define spectral intervals
for correlation analysis - Determine ?-calibration offsets for each interval
- Store 3rd order polynomial parameters fitted to
offsets vs. (gratpos/dgrat) for each pixel - ?new ?old polynomial fit
- Iterate previous steps (at least twice)
8Results
- A semi-automatic method to calibrate each pixel
in each array is now available - ?-calibration 3rd order polynomials for all
individual spectrometer pixels have been derived - Separate sets of polynomials have been calculated
for the 3 main PACS spectrometer bands and the
extra band (2nd order via filter A 54-73µm) - CO line positions are compliant with calibration
based on water - Laser positions largely compliant with
calibration, however few - single pixels show still some significant
deviations ? still to be corrected in a case by
case analysis - Laser lines may show peak-center variations due
to actual position of laser spots within the
slit. - This is the initial uplink calibration for flight
9Data Quality (1)
single pixel
Typical data used during correlation analysis
10Data Quality (2)
single pixel
rebinned module
11Accuracies
- PCD V8.0 (sec. 4.2.1)
- Required accuracy
- Peak position to within 10-20 of a spectral
resolution element - In general the requirement is met throughout all
bands however at band borders, due to leakage
effects and lower S/N the calibration accuracy
(in terms of s over all pixels) is closer to 20
of a spectral resolution element, while in band
centers, s values even better than 10 are
obtained. - sstdev(all_pixels residual ?-shift vs. model)
- Absolute verification against Laser and CO lines
- Relative verification by combining all pixels
- Be aware relative position of point sources
within slit can have significant effect -
12Remarks
- Depth of grating scans (normalized to line
- scan AOT)3rd order (2.5h), 2nd order (2.5h),
- 2nd order (2.8h),1st order (3.6h)
- (time1st 58steps 0.75sec 2updown
3numres - 2vapvac 25modules / 3600sec)
- HDO lines are detected (abundance 3e-4 partial
- pressure 2.7e-6 bar)
- CO spectra show residual lines from water
contamination
Faintest lines 3e-18W/m2
n3, 2
n2
n1
C1pF
C0.2pF
C0.1pF
Leak models
13Remarks
- Depth of grating scans (normalized to line scan
AOT)3rd order (2.5h), 2nd order (2.5h), - 2nd order (2.8h),1st order (3.6h)
- (time1st 58steps 0.75s 2updown 3numres
2vapvac 25modules / 3600s) - HDO lines are detected (abundance 3e-4 partial
pressure 2.7e-6 bar) - CO spectra show residual lines from water
contamination
Faintest lines 3e-18W/m2
14(No Transcript)
15Expected Line centers and slit widths overplotted
Verification with Laser Lines
16Next Steps / Open Work
- Investigate/recalibrate few outlying pixels found
during verification against Laser lines. The
reason is essentially the poor S/N in the
measurements during FM ILT 2. - Calibrate L/L chopper throws, spot checks
indicate that there is no significant change in
calibration - Provide Report and Calfiles (version as of this
report provided for PACS spectrometer pipeline) - Check calibration and eventually recalibrate for
FMILT 3 measurements
17Instrumental Profile (1)
- For more details see report by R. Vavrek
18Instrumental Profile (2)
19Wavelength Calibration in Flight (1)
- Observing modes
- Use standard SpecRangeScan AOT
- Use Wave_Cal mode with pointing request
- Suitable target list
- - PICC-ME-TN-013, Use of late type stars for
PACS wavelength calibration, (D. Lutz) - Photometric and Spectroscopic Calibration of
Herschel Instruments with Planets and
Satellites, (Th. Encrenaz, R. Moreno, A.
Coustenis) - Uranus(H2O), Neptune(H2O, CO), Saturn(H2O, NH3,
PH3) - Jupiter (H2O, NH3, PH3 fills entire 5x5 field
of view !)
20Wavelength Calibration in Flight (2)
Start PV
Start Routine Ops
Target visibilities (HSPOT)