How to Read Scientific Journal Articles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

How to Read Scientific Journal Articles

Description:

Methods -- identifies how patients were selected, what study procedures entailed, ... In a table, P-values are usually indicated by a footnote. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Jun155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to Read Scientific Journal Articles


1
How to Read Scientific Journal Articles
2
Major article sections
  • Abstract -- brief summary of entire article
  • Introduction -- includes literature review
    states why the research is relevant.
  • Methods -- identifies how patients were selected,
    what study procedures entailed, and statistical
    methods used.
  • Results -- presents objective results
  • Discussion -- interprets results states study
    strengths/weaknesses identifies future work

3
What population(s)?
  • The study eligibility criteria define the
    characteristics of the patients studied, and
    therefore the population(s) to which the results
    can be extended.
  • The baseline characteristics define the
    characteristics of the patients studied, and
    therefore the population(s) to which the results
    can be extended. (Often, Table I.)

4
Identification of groups
  • Typically, one group is considered a control
    group, while other groups are considered new
    treatment groups.
  • The groups should be similar, on average, except
    with respect to the primary treatment(s) of
    interest. (Often, Table I.)
  • Ideally, groups will be created by randomly
    assigning individuals to groups.

5
With respect to what are the groups being
compared?
  • The main variables by which the groups are
    compared are called the primary outcome measures.
  • A good study is designed with the primary outcome
    measures in mind.
  • The less important variables by which the groups
    are compared are called the secondary outcome
    measures.

6
How are outcome measures be analyzed
statistically?
  • The type of data and how the study was designed
    determine the appropriate analysis methods.
  • Categorical (binary) data are often summarized as
    percentages, but also odds ratios and relative
    risks.
  • Numerical (measurement) data are often summarized
    as means, but also medians.

7
Presentation of results
  • Statistical results can be presented in words or
    in a table.
  • If a summary measure, like a percentage or a
    mean, is reported without a P-value or a
    confidence interval, the result only applies to
    the sample of patients in the study.

8
Presentation of P-values
  • In a table, P-values are usually indicated by a
    footnote.
  • In writing, P-values are usually indicated in
    parentheses after the conclusion of a hypothesis
    test is stated.
  • It is the readers job to infer the null and
    alternative hypotheses of the hypothesis test.

9
Presentation of confidence intervals
  • Confidence intervals for a mean are typically
    presented in one of three ways.
  • Sample mean SD, (standard deviation)
  • Sample mean SE (standard error)
  • The lower and upper limits of the interval
  • If Sample mean SD, the 95 margin of error is
    2(SDsqrt(n))
  • If Sample mean SE, the 95 margin of error is
    2SE.

10
Presentation of confidence intervals
  • It is the readers job to know what value is
    relevant to the confidence interval
  • If a confidence interval for a difference in two
    means or a confidence interval for a difference
    in two proportions, then is 0 in the interval?
  • If a confidence interval for a relative risk, or
    a confidence interval for an odds ratio, then is
    1 in the interval?
  • And so on ...

11
Evaluation of the strengths/weaknesses of the
study
  • Is there a control group?
  • Is the study a randomized experiment or an
    observational study?
  • Were the patients selected and assigned to their
    treatments in an unbiased manner?
  • Were the patients and physicians blinded to
    treatment assignment?

12
Evaluation of the strengths/weaknesses of the
study
  • Was the sample large enough to get useful
    statistical results?
  • If the sample was really large, were confidence
    intervals created to show that a rejection of the
    null hypothesis is actually meaningful?
  • Are the conclusions of the study overstated?
  • Do the authors point out future necessary
    research?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com