Competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Competition

Description:

Leads to a reduction in survivorship, growth, and/or reproduction of at least ... In Foxglove. Digitalis purpurea. Intraspecific Competition ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: elizabe89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competition


1
Competition
  • Interaction between individuals, brought about by
    a shared requirement for a resource in limited
    supply
  • Leads to a reduction in survivorship, growth,
    and/or reproduction of at least some of the
    competing individuals

2
What are competitive species?
  • Grime species with capacity for resource
    capture and rapid growth, when resources are
    readily available defined by mechanism
  • Tilman species which have a low equilibrium
    resource requirement and maintain growth when
    resources are limited defined by outcome

3
Quantifying competition
  • Competitive effect of a plant on its neighbors
  • Competitive response of a plant to its
    neighbors
  • Competitors as defined by Grime, Tilman usually
    focus on whether there is a competitive effect

4
Competition and the Niche
  • Competition should be most severe when
    individuals are similar in resource requirements
    or life form
  • Predict intraspecific competition very high
  • Predict that interspecific competition may lead
    to niche divergence

5
Intraspecific Competition
  • The law of constant yield

6
Intraspecific Competition
  • Skewed size distributions

7
Intraspecific Competition
  • Emergence order and skewed size distribution

8
Intraspecific Competition
  • Self thinning rule, W c N (-3/2)
  • Growth occurs only as individuals die but
    growth faster than death

9
Intraspecific Competition
  • Slope approaches 1 when death balances growth
    (e.g. when growth is slow, as in shade)

SUN SHADE
In Lolium perenne
10
Intraspecific Competition
  • Variation in allocation strategy with increased
    density

In Foxglove Digitalis purpurea
11
Intraspecific Competition
  • Variation in allocation strategy with increased
    density

In corn Zea mays
12
Interspecific competition
  • Studied both in the field (removal, addition
    experiments) and in the greenhouse (additive and
    replacement designs)
  • Some controversy about methodology
  • Greenhouse expts have greater control
  • Difficult to extrapolate from greenhouse to nature

13
Interspecific competition
  • Partial additive vs. replacement designs

Additive Replacement
14
Interspecific competition
  • Partial additive inappropriate cant
    disentangle effects of total density and relative
    proportions
  • Replacement allows comparison of inter- and
    intra-specific competition, but results depend
    entirely on density chosen

15
Interspecific competition
  • Best design multiple replacement series, also
    called complete additive series
  • What we used in labmanipulate both density and
    proportion, so can infer relative importance of
    both inter- and intra-specific competition

16
DeWit Plots
Yield is normally biomass, absolute (not
relative) values are presented
Species I J
Yield
Dashed expected line if interspecific and
intraspecific competition are equal
Species I
Species J
0.5
1
0
Proportion species I
17
DeWit Plots
18
DeWit Plots
  • Model 1 effect of sp I on sp J and vice versa
    equivalent to intraspecific competition
  • Interpretation size may differ between the
    species but they have similar niches, ability to
    capture and use resources

density
19
DeWit Plots
  • Model 2 Asymmetric competition. One species is
    a superior competitor, and has a greater
    interspecific than intraspecific competitive
    effect

20
DeWit Plots
  • Model 3 Mutual antagonism. Interspecific
    competition greater than intraspecific for both
    species.

21
DeWit Plots
  • Model 4 Interspecific competition less than
    intraspecific competition for both species. May
    result from niche divergence.

22
Interspecific competition
  • Grime thought competition unimportant in
    low-resource environments or highly disturbed
    environments
  • Expect stress tolerators or ruderals
  • Tilman argued that competition important in all
    environments, but resource being competed for
    differed
  • High resource envts, compete for light low
    resource envts, compete for nitrogen

23
Tilmans model
  • Zero net growth isoclines (ZNGI) minimum
    resource requirements for species
  • ZNGI relatively lower species a better
    competitor for that resource (requires LESS of
    it)
  • ZNGI relatively higher resource can be
    considered a limiting factor for the species

24
Tilmans model
R2B
R2A
R1A
R1B
25
Tilmans model
  • If ZNGIs overlap, we add consumption vectors (C)
    to illustrate how each species uses resources
  • If each species consumes more of the resource
    that limits itself, get coexistence
  • If each species uses more of the resource that
    limits the other species, outcome is unstable

26
Tilmans model
27
Tilmans model
28
Tilmans model
  • Unstable outcome unpredictable which species
    will exclude the other
  • Depends on initial conditions relative amount
    of each resource, which species present first,
    etc.

29
Tilmans experiments
  • Start by measuring R the amount of resource
    left when a population of a single species
    reaches equilibrium density
  • Species with lowest R should competitively
    exclude all others
  • Focus Nitrogen. In grasslands, below-ground
    competition considered more important

30
Tilmans measure of R
Poor competitor
Good competitors
Tilman and Wedin.1991. Ecology 72685-700
31
Tilmans experiments
  • Introduce seeds into field plots with known
    initial N level
  • Best competitors will exclude others, as
    predicted by R

32
Tilmans field expt.
Tilman and Wedin.1991. Ecology 721038-1049
33
Other factors in competition
  • Often diffuse rather than pairwise
  • Indirect effects from other species may be
    important

34
Competition and indirect effects 1
  • Dodder (Cuscuta) in salt marsh changed
    competitive relationships

35
Competition and indirect effects 1
Callaway and Pennings. 1998. Oecologia 114
100-105.
36
Competition and indirect effects 2
  • Mixtures of rice have reduced disease
    transmission

Zhu et al. 2000. Nature 406718-722
37
Competition summary
  • Local density may be more important than total
    density
  • Small initial differences in size can have large
    consequences later
  • We can (sometimes) predict the outcome of
    competitive interactions, but indirect effects
    complicate things (more when we do multitrophic
    interactions)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com