MRN document set - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MRN document set

Description:

draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs. draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn ... Emmanuel Dotaro: emmanuel.dotaro_at_alcatel.fr. 62nd IETF Minneapolis February 2005 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: koheish
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: mrn | document | emmanuel | set

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MRN document set


1
MRN document set
Requirements
draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs
Analysis
draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval
GMPLS Protocol Extensions
draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions
2
Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region
networks (MRN)
draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-01.txt
  • Kohei Shiomoto shiomoto.kohei_at_lab.ntt.co.jp
  • Dimitri Papadimitriou dimitri.papadimitriou_at_alcat
    el.be
  • Jean-Louis Le Roux jeanlouis.leroux_at_francetelecom
    .com
  • Martin Vigoureux martin.vigoureux_at_alcatel.fr
  • Deborah Brungard dbrungard_at_att.com
  • Eiji Oki oki.eiji_at_lab.ntt.co.jp
  • Ichiro Inoue ichiro.inoue_at_lab.ntt.co.jp
  • Emmanuel Dotaro emmanuel.dotaro_at_alcatel.fr

3
Major changes (00-gt01)
  • Some clarifications
  • VNT (see next slides)
  • Node categories (see next slides)
  • Vertical vs Horizontal integration
  • Multi-region signaling

4
VNT Virtual Network Topology
  • TE based on dynamic reconfiguration of VNT
  • Optical-layer provides VNT for packet-layer
  • VNT is re-configured by LSP setup/teardown.
  • Optical-LSP is routed over the fiber topology.

Traffic demand
New VNT
Current VNT
VNT 2
VNT 1
5
Node categories
  • Multiple switching capable nodes simplex versus
    hybrid
  • A simplex node
  • single switching capability per interface, but
    can comprise of interfaces with distinct
    switching capabilities
  • advertises several TE Links each with a single SC
    value as part of its ISCD sub-TLVs.
  • A hybrid node
  • multiple switching capabilities per interface,
    and interfaces of the same hybrid node may have
    different multiple switching capabilities
  • advertises at least one TE Link containing
    multiple ISCDs with different SC values (at least
    one per supported SC value per interface).

TDM
PSC
6
Evaluation of GMPLS Protocols
against Multi Region Networks
draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-00.txt



Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom)
Deborah Brungard (ATT)
Eiji Oki (NTT)
Dimitri Papadimitriou
(Alcatel) Kohei
Shiomoto (NTT)
Martin Vigoureux (Alcatel)
  • IETF 62, Minneapolis 03/08/2005

7
Evaluation Result
MRN Requirements Implies GMPLS protocols ? Required GMPLS extensions
Control of Forwarding Adjacencies (FA) setup/release YES No
Virtual FAs YES Signaling of soft-FA
Traffic Disruption minimization during FA release YES Need for Graceful TE-link deletion
Path computation stability NO No
Support for FA LSP attributes inheritance YES No
Support for Triggered signaling YES No
Support for Multi-region signaling YES Inclusion/exclusion of ISC in G-RSVP
FA connectivity verification NO No
Advertisement of Internal Adaptation Capabilities YES Routing extension New sub-TLV
8
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Region
Networks (MRN) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpl
s-mrn-extensions-01.txt


Jean-Louis Le Roux (France
Telecom) Deborah
Brungard (ATT) Kohei Shiomoto (NTT) Dimitri
Papadimitriou (Alcatel)Martin Vigoureux
(Alcatel)
  • IETF 62, Minneapolis 03/08/2005

9
From last version (v00.txt)
  • Editorial revision
  • Coverage
  • advertisement of interface adaptation capability
    (internal termination capability)
  • multi-region signaling
  • Multi-region signaling
  • Exclude Route (XRO) for excluding set of one or
    more SC from a link supporting multiple SCs
  • Explicit Route (ERO) for including a specific SC
    from a link supporting multiple SCs

10
Next revision
  • Cover signaling of virtual Forwarding Adjacencies

11
Conclusion
  • Requirement document
  • Pretty stable
  • ready for WG status
  • Evaluation document pretty stable
  • concentrate discussions on protocol applicability
  • WG status ?
  • Solution document to be progressed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com