Title: Status, Trends, Distribution, and Functions of Wetlands in the New York City Water Supply Watershed
1Status, Trends, Distribution, and Functions of
Wetlands in the New York City Water Supply
Watershed
Laurie Machung, Bureau of Water Supply, Watershed
Protection and Planning
2(No Transcript)
3Mapping and Research Programs
- National Wetlands Inventory
- Wetlands Status and Trends
- Wetland Characterization and Preliminary
Functional Assessment - Reference Wetlands Monitoring Program
4National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
- USFWS first completed in 1996 using 158,000
scale mid 1980s aerial photography - Updated in 2005 using 140,000 scale 2003 and
2004 aerial photography - Provides base data on the distribution,
characteristics, and extent of wetlands
5Wetland Status and Trends
- Completed for the Croton Watershed in 1999,
updated in 2005 - 1968 1984
- 1984 1994
- 1994 2004
- Completed for Catskill and Delaware 12/08
- Mid 80s mid 90s
- Mid 90s 2004
6- USFWS added LLW codes to each wetland polygon in
the NWI database to depict - Landscape Position
- Lotic
- Lentic
- Terrene
- Landform
- Water flow path
- Throughflow
- Outflow
- Isolated
- Other modifiers (hw)
7- Wetlands Monitoring Program
-
- East of Hudson 6 reference sites
- West of Hudson 22 reference sites
- Water Quality
- Water Table
- Vegetation
- Soils
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10- Catskill/Delaware Reference Wetlands
-
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Croton Watershed Palustrine Wetlands
Approximately 15,355 acres (6 of land surface)
14Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Palustrine
Wetlands
Approximately 9,565 acres (1 of land surface)
15NWI vs. Delineated Area
16Wetland Trends East and West of Hudson Watersheds
17Wetland Landscape Positions in East and West of
Hudson Watersheds
18- Describes Wetland landscape settings
- Enables an estimate of wetlands potentially
lacking federal regulatory protection - SWANCC
- Isolated wetlands
- Rapanos and Carabel
- Significant nexus analysis required for
Non-navigable, non-relatively permanent
tributaries and adjacent wetlands - To determine if they significantly affect the
chemical, physical, and biological integrity of
TNWs
19Wetland Characterization
- Used USFWS LLW codes to estimate abundance of
wetlands lacking perennial connections - Two approaches
- Water Flow path modifiers
- IS, IN isolated
- OI, TI, OU intermittent
- Headwater modifiers
- IN and IS isolated
- Headwater modifier - 1st and 2nd order streams
20Croton Watershed Flow Path Method Predicts that
24 of wetlands are vulnerable isolated
(5) intermittently connected (19)
21Croton Watershed Headwater Method Predicts that
43 of wetlands are vulnerable Headwaters
38 Isolated 5
22Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Flow Path
Method Predicts that 38 of wetlands are
vulnerable isolated (13) intermittently
connected (25)
23Catskill/Delaware Watersheds Headwater
Method Predicts that 71 of wetlands are
vulnerable Headwaters (58) Isolated (13)
24Proportion of NWI Wetlands not included on NYS
FWW Maps
21
68
25Percent of Non-DEC wetlands without perennial
connections
40
68
52
70
(11)
(15)
(27)
(46)
26DOC Export
27DOC Export
28DOC vs Color East of Hudson Wetland Outflows
29Conclusions
- According to the NWI, Wetlands occupy
- 15,355 acres, or 6 of Croton Watershed
- 9,565 acres, or 1 of the Catskill and Delaware
Watersheds - Reference Wetland monitoring identified margin of
error in NWI mapping - Net rates of wetland loss have declined over the
time periods studied - Pond construction was leading cause of wetland
loss in all time periods, though rates have
declined
30Conclusions
- Based USFWS LLW modifiers, an estimated
- 24 to 43 of Croton Watershed Wetlands and 38
to 71 of Catskill/Delaware Wetlands could lose
federal protection and - 11 to 15 of Croton Wetlands and
27 to 46 of Catskill/Delaware wetlands would
lack federal or state protection
31Conclusions
- Reference wetland monitoring is a valuable tool
to assess whether wetlands have a nexus to
traditional navigable waters
32(No Transcript)