Bootstrapping ontology evolution with multimedia information extraction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Bootstrapping ontology evolution with multimedia information extraction

Description:

STRP, IST-2004-2.4.7 'Semantic-based Knowledge and Content Systems' ... Dip. di Informatica e Comunicazione, University of Milano (ISLab), Italy. Inst. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: carbonVide1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bootstrapping ontology evolution with multimedia information extraction


1
Bootstrapping ontology evolution with multimedia
information extraction
  • C.D. Spyropoulos, G. Paliouras, V. Karkaletsis,
    D. Kosmopoulos,
  • I. Pratikakis, S. Perantonis, B. Gatos

2
The facts
  • STRP, IST-2004-2.4.7 Semantic-based Knowledge
    and Content Systems
  • Start March 1 2006, End February 28, 2009
  • Budget 5.075.678 Euro, Funding 3.150.000 Euro
  • Consortium
  • Inst. of Informatics Telecommunications, NCSR
    Demokritos (SKEL CIL), Greece (Coordinator)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Media Communication
    (NetMedia), Germany
  • Dip. di Informatica e Comunicazione, University
    of Milano (ISLab), Italy
  • Inst. of Telematics and Informatics CERTH (IPL),
    Greece
  • Hamburg University of Technology (STS), Germany
  • Tele Atlas, The Netherlands
  • More than 30 people already active in the project
  • Project portal http//www.boemie.org/

3
Objectives
  • Providing technology to represent and evolve
    domain-specific multimedia ontologies.
  • Moving from low-level, general-purpose,
    single-modality feature extraction towards
    semantic, multimedia analysis.
  • Robust and scalable ontology-driven multimedia
    content extraction through ontology evolution.

4
Approach
  • Driven by domain-specific multimedia ontologies,
    BOEMIE information extraction systems will be
    able to identify high-level semantic features in
    image, video, audio and text and fuse these
    features for optimal extraction.
  • The ontologies will be continuously populated and
    enriched using the extracted semantic content.
  • This is a bootstrapping process, since the
    enriched ontologies will in turn be used to drive
    the multimedia information extraction system.

5
The end users view
  • The user wants to see the marathon of the 2006
    athletics world championship in Athens. She wants
    to retrieve images and video of participating
    athletes in previous marathons.
  • The system has extracted the participating
    athletes names from official Web sites.
  • It has also populated the marathon ontology with
    images and video of past events, relating them to
    the athletes through fusion with audio and text.

6
The end users view
  • The user also wants to select a good view of the
    event, by retrieving images and video, associated
    with landmarks of the city.
  • The system has identified landmarks in visual
    information about past marathons in Athens and
    has thus georeferenced the content.
  • Reasoning can associate the city landmarks with
    the event and the related content.

7
The service providers view
8
The service providers view
  • Customize and use the system
  • Intialization collecting, extending and merging
    ontologies for domains
  • Training collecting a training data set, using
    it for the training of the semantics extraction
    and ontology evolution tools
  • Information gathering continuous collection of
    content from various sources
  • Semantics extraction applying the trained tools
    to the incoming stream of content
  • Ontology evolution populating and enriching the
    ontologies using the results of the extraction
    task
  • Information positioning linking the extracted
    data to the map data

9
Semantics extraction
  • No single modality is powerful enough to support
    robust and large-scale extraction.
  • Emphasis on fusion of multiple modalities, using
    reasoning and handling uncertainty.
  • Contribution to the state of the art in visual
    content analysis, due to its richness and the
    difficulty of extracting semantics.
  • Non-visual content will provide supportive
    evidence, to improve precision.

10
Multimedia semantic model
  • A multimedia ontology describes the structure of
    multimedia content and visual characteristics of
    content objects in terms of low-level features.
  • One or more domain ontologies, e.g. about
    athletics.
  • A geographic ontology, e.g. about landmarks.
  • An event ontology, e.g. about athletic events.
  • Potential contribution
  • Uncertainty in concept descriptions.
  • Spatial and temporal relations.

11
Ontology evolution
  • Ontology population and enrichment, i.e.,
    addition of concepts, relations, properties and
    instances.
  • Coordination of homogeneous ontologies (same
    domain) and heterogeneous ontologies (e.g. domain
    and multimedia ontologies).
  • Potential contribution
  • Ontology population from multimedia content.
  • Combination of different types of reasoning for
    enrichment and coordination.
  • Matching, coordination and versioning of the
    integrated semantic model.

12
Open issues semantics extraction
  • Annotating training data for image and video.
  • Segment-level and document-level annotation and
    tracking.
  • Modeling of modality-specific domain concepts.
  • Use of entities extracted by one modality in the
    analysis of another.
  • Synchronization of different modalities.
  • The role of the semantic model in fusion and in
    single-modality analysis.
  • Support for concept and relation discovery from
    visual content.
  • Scalability!

13
Open issues semantic model
  • Do we need to go beyond description logics, e.g.
    cannot support temporal reasoning in event
    detection?
  • What type of uncertainty and how is it going to
    be incorporated?
  • Combination of ontologies and reasoning with
    specialized databases, e.g. geographic.
  • Identify detectable concepts for various
    modalities.

14
Open issues ontology evolution
  • Combination of different types of reasoning in
    ontology learning.
  • Incremental reasoning services to support
    evolution.
  • Evaluation of ontology enrichment.
  • Combination of evidence (e.g. from instances,
    lexical, etc.) for matching.
  • Comparison of ontology versions.
  • Minimization of human involvement!

15
Open issues system integration
  • Implementation of the bootstrapping process,
    integrating semantic extraction and ontology
    evolution, through the semantic model.
  • Crawling for content collection and content
    quality assessment.
  • Distributed storage and indexing.
  • Demonstration of added value for the end user!

16
BOEMIE workshop
  • BOEMIE 2006
  • Workshop on Ontology Evolution and Multimedia
    Information Extraction
  • http//www.boemie.org/boemie2006
  • October 6, 2006, Podebrady, Czech Republic
  • in EKAW 2006
  • 15th International Conference on Knowledge
    Engineering and Knowledge Management
  • http//ekaw.vse.cz/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com