BREAKS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

BREAKS

Description:

(Dunbar & Rodgers, 1957) Disconformity: All strata are parallel but the ... (Dunbar ... (Dunbar & Rodgers, 1957) Horizontally bedded Carmel formation resting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: metu3
Category:
Tags: breaks | dunbar

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BREAKS


1
Chapter 3
UNCONFORMITY
BREAKS IN THE RECORD
2
  • BREAKS IN THE RECORD
  • The stratigraphy is the study of stratified
    rocks.
  • So whereever we study these rocks, especially the
    sedimentary rocks we find some gaps.
  • These gaps vary or range in magnitude
  • from the short span of time, recorded only
    obscure bedding planes,
  • to great breaks where a very large gap of time
    is recorded.

3
Unconformities
  • So far we have discussed vertical relationships
    among conformable strata
  • sequences of rocks in which deposition was more
    or less continuous
  • Unconformities in sequences of strata represent
    times of nondeposition and/or erosion that
    encompass long periods of geologic time
  • millions to hundreds of millions of years
  • The rock record is incomplete
  • interval of time not represented by strata is a
    hiatus

4
Origins of an Unconformity
  • Deposition began 12 million years ago (MYA)
  • Continuing until 4 MYA
  • For 1 million years erosion occurred
  • removing 2 MY of rocks
  • The last column is the actual stratigraphic
    record with an unconformity

5
  • BREAKS IN THE RECORD
  • Unconformity
  • Unconformity is the temporal break in a
    stratigraphic sequence resulting from a change in
    regime that caused deposition to cease for a
    considerable span of time.
  • Uplift ? Erosion with the loss of some of the
    previously formed record.
  • Unconformity is a HIATUS representing a certain
    span of time.

6
  • Types of Unconformity
  • Nonconformity Stratified rocks rest upon
    non-stratified rocks, either igneous or
    metamorphic rocks.
  • Angular Unconformity An angular discordance
    separates two units of stratified rocks.
  • Disconformity All strata are parallel but the
    contact between two units is an uneven erosional
    surface. The surface of unconformity is an old
    erosion surface of appreciable relief.
  • ParaconformityThe beds are parallel and the
    contact is a simple bedding plane. So the
    evidence of a break is not obvious.

7
Figure 50
Types of Unconformity
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
8
Nonconformity--Triassic dolostone over
crystalline basement, French Alps
9
Nonconformity
10
Deeply Eroded Intrusions - NONCONFORMITY
GRANITE INTRUSION
SHALE
11
Nonconformity Stratified rocks rest upon
non-stratified rocks, either igneous or
metamorphic rocks.
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
12
Angular Unconformity An angular discordance
separates two units of stratified rocks.
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
13
Angular Unconformity
Hutton's angular unconformity at Siccar Pt.,
Scotland
14
Angular Unconformity
15
Angular Unconformity
16
Disconformity All strata are parallel but the
contact between two units is an uneven
erosional surface. The surface of unconformity
is an old erosion surface of appreciable relief.
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
17
U
  • Paraconformity The beds are parallel and the
    contact is a simple bedding plane. So the
    evidence of a break is not obvious.

(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
18
Late Carboniferous
Early Carboniferous
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
19
Types of Unconformities
  • Unconformities of regional extent may change from
    one type to another

20
CRITERIA for RECOGNITION and EVALUATION
  • Three steps
  • Recognition of the unconformity
  • Determination the magnitude
  • Evaluation the importance
  • Nonconformity
  • No contact metamorphism (Chilled / Baked
    margins)
  • Pebbles of the igneous/metamorphic rocks in the
    overlying units.

21
NONCONFORMITY ????
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
22
ANGULAR UNCONFORMITY
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
The angle of discordance does not indicate the
relative importance of the hiatus. The
discordance may reach any angle up to 900 (a) or
the folds flatten out (f) the discordance
declines even though the hiatus does not decrease.
23
ANGULAR UNCONFORMITY ????
Horizontally bedded Carmel formation resting on
cross-bedded Navajo sandstone (both Jurassic)
1.75 miles west of Boulder, Utah.
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
24
  • DISCONFORMITY
  • Erosional relief at the contact
  • Where the surface of unconformity cuts across
    beds, it is evident that uplift and erosion have
    occurred during the hiatus.
  • Relief makes the unconformity impressive. The
    relief is limited by the amount of the uplift and
    the activity of erosional agent (stream).
  • So during a very short time you may have an
    impressive
  • relief and this make you think that there is a
    very important unconformity.

25
Erosional relief at the contact
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
26
  • DISCONFORMITY
  • Regional beveling of formations or of faunal
    zones
  • In conformable rock sequences, an unconformity
    may sometimes be recognized by the systematic
    appearance (or disappearance) of units at a given
    contact over a large region.

27
Regional beveling of formations
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
28
Regional beveling of faunal zones
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
29
CRITERIA for RECOGNITION and EVALUATION
  • Abrupt lithologic change
  • Evidence of an old erosion surface
  • Physical form of the surface
  • Irregularities
  • Mounds
  • Crevices
  • Caves
  • This surface is overlapped and filled by the
    materials of the overlying unit.
  • Evidence of weathering of the rock below before
    deposition of the rock above
  • Fire clay
  • Old soil profile
  • Silicified surfaces
  • Calichified surfaces

30
Evidence of an old erosion surface
(Dunbar Rodgers, 1957)
31
  • The abrupt truncation of structural features
  • Joints
  • Folds
  • Faults
  • Dykes
  • It may be the presence of pebbles from the beds
    below in the basal layers above.
  • Lag gravels and sands, concentrates of phosphate,
    manganese, iron or glauconite nodules or grains
    may be suggestive for evidence of unconformity.

32
  • Paleontological evidence
  • The final and the only criterion that gives
    quantitative results for the large
    unconformities.
  • The faunal breaks prove a hiatus and at the same
    time indicate its temporal value by placing the
    beds above and below in widely different
    divisions of the geologic column.
  • However, an abrupt faunal break is no evidence of
    a hiatus. It may be due to a change in bottom
    ecology without interruption of the deposition.

33
  • Diastem
  • Short breaks due to non-deposition or to
    sublevation of loose sediment on the sea floor
    are called diastems.
  • An unconformity records a change in the overall
    conditions of deposition, commonly involving, at
    least regional uplift and erosion.
  • Diastems, on the contrary, are smaller breaks
    resulting from the normal changes that occur
    without any basic change in the general regimen.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com