Sustaining Innovation through New PMS Arrangements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Sustaining Innovation through New PMS Arrangements

Description:

Patients expectations are for similar opportunities for improvement ... More schemes depart from national QOF. more difficult to provide management information ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: OIS3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sustaining Innovation through New PMS Arrangements


1
Sustaining Innovation through New PMS Arrangements
  • Richard Armstrong

2
Quality in PMS (Chapter 4)
  • Quality is equally important in PMS as in
  • new GMS. Therefore
  • Patients expectations are for similar
    opportunities for improvement
  • Quality delivery and quality framework in
  • PMS should be broadly comparable to
  • national QOF
  • Equally, should be similar reward for
  • similar effort between PMS and GMS

3
Quality in PMS
  • BUT .
  • PMS not a one-size-fits-all model
  • Some quality payments already in
  • PMS practices baseline
  • Therefore PMS can be different from
  • National QOF

4
Quality in PMS
  • PMS Quality Points Offset
  • What is already in baseline covers -
  • Sustained Quality Allowance
  • Chronic Disease Management
  • Half of Cervical Cytology Screening
  • Points Offset in 04/05 174 13,050
  • Reduces to 109 points in 05/06

5
Quality in PMS
  • Issues in developing local schemes
  • Schemes must be points-based -1050
  • More schemes depart from national QOF
  • more difficult to provide management information
  • No national information about relative prevalence
    in local schemes
  • Local schemes must be subject to fair
  • and thorough assessment of achievement

6
Quality in PMS
  • Issues in developing local schemes
  • Senior PCT clinician responsible for
  • ensuring fairness between local and
  • national quality framework. Ensuring local
  • Quality schemes are
  • Rigorous
  • Evidence based
  • Monitored fairly
  • Explicitly assessed against agreed criteria
  • Paid at an appropriate and equitable rate

7
Quality in PMS
  • Some options for local schemes
  • National QOF plus local add-ons
  • Different interventions
  • Different indicators
  • Fewer indicators
  • Different evidence base
  • Different approaches

8
Practice-led Commissioning
  • Not fund-holding
  • Not just about GPs or General
  • Practice (about clinical teams)
  • WHY?
  • Empowering engaging clinicians
  • Choice, Access, Payment by Results
  • - Allowing innovation
  • - Providing clear mechanisms for accountability

9
Practice-led Commissioning
  • Rights Responsibilities
  • - Clinical Team
  • - PCT
  • Down to PCT to determine
  • - scope
  • - range and
  • - form of arrangements
  • Not complete (or single) answer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com