Title: ASSET MANAGEMENT Report Findings Issues
1ASSET MANAGEMENT Report Findings Issues
IdeasRegion 2 Pilot Project
- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
- January 23, 2007
2- ODOT is committed to providing a safe and
efficient transportation system. As ODOTs
emphasis shifts from a new construction to
management of the transportation system, it is
imperative for us to optimize our limited
financial and staff resources. To do this we
need tools and processes in place to allow for
system-wide analysis across a range of assets.
Asset Management will provide such tools and
processes. Developing an Integrated Asset
Management system is critical to ODOTs future
success
Doug Tindall, ODOT Deputy Director for Highway
3ASSET MANAGEMENT Region 2 Pilot Report
- BACKGROUND
- Why
- How
- When
- Who
- Where
- CRITERIA
- Assessment of Readiness
- Asset Mgmt Cycle
- Common Scale for Rating
- PILOT REPORTS
- Written
- Mapped
- WHAT WE FOUND
- Issues
- Conditions
- IDEAS
- NEXT STEPS
- QUESTIONS
4PILOT Background
- Agreement to move forward November 2005
- Purpose to better understand data, features,
fieldwork, reporting decision-making - Preliminary effort to identify data felt
necessary to manage ODOTs transportation assets
Wish List January through March 2006 - First level assessment of data availability
January through April 2006
5PILOT Background, continued
- Corridor inventories (in-office field May
through October 2006) to determine - What we know
- What we dont know
- Accuracy of information
- Ease or difficulty of obtaining data new or
existing - Adjustments to data gathered based on experience
- Test condition assessment criteria on a sampling
of inventoried features - Integrate existing and additional data into
prototype reports October to January 07 - Equate to common scale
6PILOT Tools Used
- Inventory/data collection methods included
- Reports from existing databases
- Video log (with side view camera) only
- Video log with field validation
- Video log with additional data captured in the
field (measurements, coordinates) - Field work
Most Common
7PILOT - Whos Been Involved?
- Pilot Project Sponsors Jeff Scheick, Craig
Greenleaf, Mike Marsh, Cathy Nelson - AM Team Dave Ringeisen, Mark Wills, Robin Ness,
Sam Johnston, Laura Wipper, Laura Gonzales, Paul
Wirfs - Pilot Oversight Cathy Nelson, Mike Long, Dave
Ringeisen, Laura Wipper - Technical Team Don Jordan, Dave Ringeisen,
Bruce Johnson, Laura Wipper, Paul Wirfs, Steve
Lindland, Dave Greenberg, Steve Cooley, John
Coplantz, Heather King, Harold Lasley, Mike
Stone, Heidi Shoblom, Joe Bonawitz - Many, Many More Bert Hartman, Darryl Haugeberg,
Darryl Morse, Dawn Mach, Bruce Novahovich, Jeff
Swanstrom, Curran Mohney, Katie Castelli, Jason
Snyder, Tom Kammerer, Don Turner, Rob Trevis, Dan
Wright, Jeff Drago, Lisa Larsen, Ben Martinez,
Keith Russell, Greg Apke, Marcus Berlin, Amy
Tripp, Eric Zuern, Ryan Johnson, Dennis Scofield,
Marcia Malstrom, Stephanie Sorensen, Dan
MacDonald, Russ Frost, Scott Billings, Patti
Caswell, Casey Ragain, Tom Halsey, Orville
Gaylor, Chris Rowland, Scott Stinnett, Candice
Stich, Dave Goodwin, Michael Ronkin, Sheila
Lyons, Tyler Ferguson, Bill Link, Galen McGill,
Hau Hagedorn, Steve Reed, Chris Monsere, Doug
Bish, Tim Burks, Kevin Haas, Troy Costales, Susan
Mead, Darlene Gowen, Don Crownover, Tricia
Tanner, Brian Dunn, Rich Arnold, Brian Gregor,
Danny Spaulding, Laura Gonzales, Chuck Jenkins,
Dan Kaplan, Randall Jenkins, Jim Gavin, Terry
Cole, Bob Melbo, Dinah Vanderhyde, Dan Kampf
..
8PILOT Locations in the Valley
9PILOT - Snow Zone Location
10PILOT Location Details
Note Corridors (point-to-point) chosen to
replicate a system Can include asset/feature
data performance measures
11PILOT Integration Review
- Bridges structures
- Retaining Walls
- Culverts
- Pavements
- Road approaches
- Right of way
- Roadside barriers
- Aggregate
- Wetlands mitigation
- Traffic Operations Features
- Sound barriers
- Curbs
- Storm water control facilities
- Bicycle pedestrian facilities
- Rumblestrips
- Pavement markings
- Slopes
- Performance diagnostics
- Inventory
- First Level Condition
- Functionalitiy
- Readiness for Asset Management
Information
Features
12PILOT Assessment of Readiness
- Determined based on the presence of a series of
data and processes. The degree that each of these
areas was addressed determined degree of
readiness. These areas or elements fell into five
categories - Basic Inventory
- Details
- Financial Information
- Performance Goals
- Forecasting/Planning Information
13PILOT - Readiness Details
- Basic Inventory
- Type size location first level condition
(FLC simplified condition assessment) - Details
- Other appropriate details installation date
regular update cycles informed by Maintenance
Construction - Financial Information
- Original or replacement cost maintenance
investment depreciation rate - Performance Goals
- Measures diagnostics service levels, standards
and goals - Forecasting/Planning Information
- Deterioration rate full condition assessment
criteria rating inspection program
decommission date
14ASSET MANAGEMENT - Readiness
Draft
15COMMON SCALE - Condition
For comparison across assets functionality
- Good
- Fair
- Needs Inspection/Below Avg.
- Poor
- Not Pertinent
- Unknown
16A Picture is worth 1000 Words
Asset Management Readiness
Pilot Sample - Condition Found
17ASSET MANAGEMENT - Cycle
18MISSING PIECES OF CYCLE
Current State is not so current Not informed
by Maintenenance activities or costs Not
adequately informed by Construction
19READINESS
Only three groups of transporation assets
included in the pilot have any level of
readiness for proactive management 1.
Bridges 2. Pavements 3. ITS Equipment
20CONDITION
Actual or estimated condition, where
available, of transportation assets within the
pilot corridors. Only two, pavements bridges,
have established rating systems.
21PILOT - Reports
- Two products
- Mapped inventory and condition
- Layers in TransGIS
- Written documentation of experiences of the pilot
- General or overarching issues
- Asset specifics
22REPORTING CONCEPTS
Maps use color-coded symbology to convey location
condition
Asset Mgmt Pilot in TransGIS
Roadside Features
Core Features
Support Features
Needs Attention
User Risk Mgmt
System Risk Mgmt
- Approaches
- Barriers
- Shoulders
- Seismic Lifeline Routes
- Slide Vul.
- Seismic Vul.
- Retaining Walls
- Culverts
- Pavements
- Bridges
- Retaining Walls
- Culverts
- Approaches
- Barriers
- Signs
- Curbs
- Bike Facilities
- Sidewalks
- Crosswalks
- Slopes
- Segment Crash Rates
- Safe Drivers
- Segment Crash History Rating
- Approach Density Rating
- Pavements
- Bridges
- Retaining Walls
- Culverts
Culverts
Retaining Walls
- ALSO FOLDERS FOR
- Highway Operations
- Bike/Pedestrian
- Freight Movement
- Environmental/Livability
Bridges
Pavements
DETAILS
23PILOT - Mapping
- ArcGIS/TransGIS
- Product previewed in ArcGIS, but moving to
TransGIS - Both offer
- On or off - layers
- Zoom in or out
- i button
- Data tables
- TransGIS
- Adds automated report capability
24PILOT Written Report
- Section 1
- Executive Summary
- Section 2
- Background
- Asset Management Readiness Criteria
- Issues Ideas
- Data Mapping
- Section 3
- Asset Specifics
- Section 4
- Future Potential
- Section 5
- Appendices
25PILOT - Issues/Findings
- Lack Asset Management readiness based on
- Lack of Basic Inventory Data for most
assets/features included in pilot - Conditions found based on sampling indicate
potential need for expedited pace for certain
assets/features - The Current State in Asset Mgmt cycle is not
informed by Maintenance and Construction - Without solutions, inventory today may not be
Current State tomorrow - Ad hoc, fractured data collection ongoing, but
inconsistencies equal lack of usable corporate
information
26PILOT Ideas to Bridge Gaps
- Build Asset Management readiness
- Identify immediate priorities and creative,
collaborative resourcing, based on - Condition, stewardship responsibilities, public
safety, external expectations decide get
started - Make increasing levels of information available
over time - Basic Inventory Data with First Level Condition
informs next efforts and necessary adjustments in
priorities - Begin immediately to build capacities for Asset
Mgmt Cycle to be efficiently informed by
Maintenance and Construction - Build capacities in existing systems to house
data resource and structure temporary solutions
that will transition to corporate DB - Develop methods and resources to pull data
gathering efforts together to create corporate
information - Regional Inventory Specialists serve as
gathers, facilitators, liaisons, trainees,
trainers, etc. - Data Council
27BEYOND THE PILOT - Where Do We Begin?
Get to "Green" Staged process to build
capacity Working across and down based on
resources and priority
28BEYOND THE PILOT Devil in the Details
- Consistency issues will need to be addressed
early to be successful - Clearly define assets, attributes and clarify
responsibilities - Ensure proper training and tools are available
- Make sure there are no gaps
- Triage approach useful to build information
- Inventory, locate and first line of observation
- Will rely on technical staff for criteria (the
details!) - Resourcing
- Identify collaborative roles
- Communication Education
29Field Validation Where?
30CHALLENGES CAN BE OVERCOME
- Challenges for ODOT
- Consistency, definition, goals for assets
- Resources
- Information gaps
- Can overcome through
- Discussion, decisions informed goal setting
- Collaboration
- How can the whole organization benefit from my
activity? - Triage approach until full picture is in place,
i.e., - Basics first locate observe methods
criteria technical follow-up worst first (for
now)
31ASSET MANAGEMENT The Payoff
- ODOT Today
- The right information is NOT available to the
right people at the right time to make informed
decisions - Separate endeavors to fill the gaps mean
repeated, inefficient efforts to acquire data for
one-time use - ODOT Tomorrow
- The right information IS increasingly available -
informed decisions are based upon complete and
reliable data that enables better results - Efficient efforts on appropriate cycles provide
data and information for multiple uses by many
32ASSET MANAGEMENT Next Steps
- Decisions
- What Assets First?
- Where, i.e., Statewide or Priority Routes?
- How Much Data What Tools Will Be Used?
- Whos Involved?
- When Aggressive Timeline?
- WHY? To Manage Transportation Assets
Proactively Based on Information Best Practices!
33 34BEYOND THE PILOT - Where We Could Begin
Core Features
Retaining Walls
- Basic inventory criteria developed by technical
staff - Statewide location first by video log (need side
view) by non-technical staff or Region Inventory
Specialist - Followed by FLC GPS by non-technical staff/RIS
Culverts
- Collaborate and build on maintenance knowledge
- Statewide location FLC
- Facilitated by Region Inventory Specialist
- Follow up by consultant according to contract
35BEYOND THE PILOT - Where We Could Continue
Momentum
Right of Way
Signs
- Support efforts for statewide database
- Technical assistance with R-5 inventory
- Develop model for broader relationships
- Signs, signals, illumination often co-located
on.but not associated with a pole, post or
traffic structure - Identify one home and relationships for data,
i.e., traffic structures
Roadside Barriers
- Remaining 15 mainline many high volume routes
- Frontage roads, etc. video log support?
- Data in Excel built to migrate to ITIS
36BEYOND THE PILOT - We Could Meet Expectations
Bicycle/Pedestrian Features
Bike Facilities
- Legislative queries every session
- Struggled to meet data requirements for
department-level performance measure - Now have better definitions
- Plan in place to complete inventory by July 2008
Pedestrian Facilities
- Same expectations as for bicycle facilities
- Opportunity for collaboration and coordination
between program staff and Region staff regarding
ADA ramps
37BEYOND THE PILOT - Where We Could Learn
More About Interrelationships
Road Approaches
- Programmatic need for complete inventory
- Legislative queries past sessions
- Correlations with segment crash rates valuable
information for decisions communications - Sections with higher than expected crash rates
could be highest priority for first inventory - Video log good tool for getting started
Segment Crash Rates
- Support potential research project to develop
statewide expected rates for similar highways
conditions - One to two mile segments different than SIP, but
complimentary to SPIS - Proactive response to pending low-volume rural
roads program
38BEYOND THE PILOT Resources Tools
- Staff
- Consider Limited Duration positions in each
region to serve as inventory specialist - Train on methods, tools and requirements for
inventory - Identify other opportunities or windows for staff
resources - Systems Processes
- Develop interim processes to complete Asset
Management Cycle - Maintenance Core Features first?
- Construction As-constructed data
- Begin development of longer-term fix
- Develop transitional database options,
coordination support - Tools
- Video log Timed to meet priorities needs
- GPS tools Resourced support for use, forms,
downloads, etc.
39BEYOND THE PILOT Other Ideas
- Explore more about reporting needs and
relationships - Right links and right views?
- Other links and other views?
- Other pilot phases
- Develop, assess, test on small scale to be ready
for implementation on a larger scale - Other assets
- New assessments