Atmospheric Features of Transiting Exoplanets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Atmospheric Features of Transiting Exoplanets

Description:

Exoplanets found to date are very diverse and have orbits and masses different ... on Na I and K I in the atmosphere of HD 209458b and 51 Peg (Bundy & Marcy 2000) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: nb16
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Atmospheric Features of Transiting Exoplanets


1
Atmospheric Features of Transiting Exoplanets
  • Nassim Bozorgnia
  • Thesis Advisor Dr. Debra Fischer

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Brown Dwarfs
  • 2.1 Brown Dwarf Detections
  • 2.2 Brown Dwarf Atmospheres
  • 3. Searches for Exoplanet Atmospheres
  • 3.1 Space-based Observations
  • 3.2 Ground-based Observations
  • HD 149026 A Star with a Transiting Planet
  • 4.1 HD 149026b An L/T Dwarf
  • 4.2 Observations
  • 4.3 Data Analysis
  • 5. Detectability Simulations
  • 6. Summary and Conclusion

3
1. Introduction
  • More than 170 extrasolar planets detected by
    Doppler surveys over the past ten years (Marcy et
    al. 2005)
  • Exoplanets found to date are very diverse and
    have orbits and masses different from planets in
    our Solar System.

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • Short-period massive planets that orbit within
    0.1 AU of their host stars are called hot
    Jupiters
  • About 10 of all hot Jupiters transit their host
    star.
  • Transiting exoplanets offer a unique opportunity
    to search for constituents in the planet
    atmosphere.

6
Artists concept of HD 149026b in transit
(artwork by Lynette Cook)
7
  • N2K Consortium Carry out Doppler surveys of the
    Next 2000 FGK stars using Keck, Subaru, Magellan
    (Fischer et al. 2005)
  • To date, six exoplanets with periods between 1.2
    to 12 days have been discovered by the N2K
    consortium.
  • HD 149026b is a short-period, Saturn-mass planet
    that transits its host star, and was recently
    discovered by the N2K Consortium.

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Transiting planets are likely to reside close to
    their host stars. These strongly irradiated
    planets have atmospheres similar to brown dwarfs.
  • the strongest absorption features in brown dwarf
    atmospheres are expected to be from alkali metals
    such as Na I and K I, and Li I resonance
    doublets.

10
2. Brown Dwarfs
  • Brown dwarfs are low-mass substellar objects that
    do not fuse hydrogen into helium as do stars on
    the main-sequence and cannot stabilize their
    surface and central temperatures.
  • Because of their low masses, the core contraction
    of brown dwarfs is not halted by gas pressure and
    hydrogen fusion, but by electron degeneracy.

11
Hydrostatic equilibrium in normal stars
12
2.1. Brown Dwarf Detections
  • 1988 GD 165B was discovered to orbit the 32-pc
    distant DA4 white dwarf GD 165 (Becklin and
    Zuckerman 1988).
  • 1995 Gliese 229B which was orbiting the 5.7-pc
    distant M1 dwarf Gl 229 was discovered (Nakajima
    et al. 1995).
  • These object were not classifiable as normal M
    dwarfs and were thought to be a link between
    stars and planets.

13
  • Follow-up discoveries made it clear that new
    spectral types were needed to link the previously
    known low-mass stars to cool, planet-like
    objects.
  • The L and T spectral classes were suggested by
    Kirkpatrick et al. in 1999, and to date, a total
    of 403 L dwarfs and 62 T dwarfs have been
    discovered.

14
2.2. Brown Dwarf Atmospheres
  • The spectra of L dwarfs, T dwarfs and irradiated
    giant planets have dominant absorption lines from
    neutral alkali metals like Na, K, Cs, Rb, and Li.
  • The more refractory metals like aluminum,
    magnesium, iron, silicon, and calcium, condense
    at low temperatures, and form droplets and rain
    out of the atmosphere, leaving the upper
    atmosphere depleted of heavy elements.

15
  • Various qualitative similarities exist between
    the atmosphere of giant exoplanets and those of
    late type L dwarfs.
  • Based on the effective temperature range of the
    atmosphere of the planet, one can estimate the
    spectral type of the exoplanet, classify it as a
    particular extrasolar giant planet class, and
    predict its atmospheric composition.

16
Adopted from Burrows (2001). For an atmospheric
temperature of 1500 K and pressure of 1 bar,
neutral alkali lines are dominant.
17
3. Searches for Exoplanet Atmospheres
  • HD 209458 a G0 dwarf with V7.65
  • The transiting planet has an anomalously large
    radius of 1.3 RJup , making it an excellent
    candidate to search for atmospheric features.
  • Searching for atmospheric signatures in other
    exoplanets is difficult
  • Lower intrinsic brightness of the host star
  • Smaller planet to star radius

18
3.1. Space-Based Observations
  • HST Observations
  • Absorption from sodium at 5893 Å in the
    atmosphere of HD 209458b (Charbonneau et al.
    2002)
  • Detection of an escaping extended exosphere of
    hydrogen in HD 209458b (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004)
  • Spitzer Observations
  • Detection of infrared radiation of 209458 and
    TrES-1 (Charbonneau et al. Deming et al. 2005)

19
3.2. Ground-Based Observations
  • Lick Keck Weak upper limits on Na I and K I in
    the atmosphere of HD 209458b and 51 Peg (Bundy
    Marcy 2000).
  • No carbon monoxide absorption features detected
    in the transmission spectrum of HD 209458b at
    2.3 µm using NIRSPEC on Keck II (Deming et al.
    2005).

20
4. HD 149026 A Star with a Transiting Planet
  • HD 149026 is a metal-rich G0 IV subgiant with
    V8.15.
  • HD 149026b was initially detected by the N2K
    consortium, using Subaru and Keck telescopes.
  • Orbital characteristics
  • a 0.045 AU
  • P 2.8759650.000085-0.000135 days
  • Msini 0.360.03 MJup

21
Keplerian fit overplotted on the phased RV data
obtained at Subaru and Keck (adopted from Sato et
al. 2005).
22
Photometric transits of HD 149026 observed at
Fairborn Observatory. Solid curves represent the
best-fit models (Adapted from Sato et al. 2005).
23
4.1. HD 149026b An L/T dwarf
  • The equilibrium temperature of an exoplanet
    atmosphere at the substellar point

where f 1 for an isotropic emission, and the
Bond albedo, AB is 0.3. ? We calculate Teq 1593
K.
24
  • Fortney et al. (2006) report different Teff for
    the planet based on different atmospheric models
  • For a cloud free model with M/H0.5 and
    assuming isotropic radiation Teff 1734 K
  • If radiation is not isotropic, but radiates from
    the day side only (2p steradians), this same
    atmospheric model yields Teff 2148 K
  • ?Therefore, the temperature of HD 149026b is
    likely to be similar to the temperature of L/T
    dwarfs.

25
4.2. Observations
  • A total of 30 spectra obtained at Keck using the
    HIRES echelle spectrometer.
  • Eighteen of these spectra were obtained while the
    planet was in transit.
  • Wavelength range 3500-8000 Å
  • Resolution, R55000 S/N250

26
(No Transcript)
27
Two Sources of Contamination
  • Iodine contamination 4800-6200 Å
  • (Due to the iodine absorption cell on the
    telescope.)
  • Telluric contamination wavelengths greater than
    6000 Å

28
(No Transcript)
29
4.3. Data Analysis
  • Goal To Search for constituents of the planet
    atmosphere during transit.
  • Compare spectra obtained during transit with
    those obtained out of transit
  • First Step
  • Identify the in and out of transit observations
    by using the ephemeris of HD 149026b and
    phase-folding the RV data.

30
(No Transcript)
31
The Rossiter-McLaughlin Effect
32
  • Next Step Compare the in and out of transit
    spectra
  • Constructed a high signal-to-noise continuum-
    normalized template for HD 149026 by averaging
    all 12 nontransit spectra.
  • Normalized each individual spectrum (both in and
    out of transit), and cross-correlated with the
    template spectrum.

33
Number of Photons
Pixels
34
  • We then constructed an average transit spectrum
    from 18 in-transit spectra
  • Calculated the difference between the template
    nontransit spectrum and the average in-transit
    spectrum.
  • We searched the full wavelength range of
    6500-8000 Å by eye for any residuals.

35
  • First portion of 2nd order

36
  • Nine spectral orders were covered by this method.
  • Because of contamination from telluric and iodine
    lines, we were not able to cover other
    wavelengths by this technique.
  • ?No significant variations between the in-transit
    and out-of-transit spectra greater than a few
    percent were found.

37
  • A more robust analysis Looking at individual
    lines
  • Searching for potassium
  • Overplotted an in-transit spectrum on the
    template spectrum at the place of the K line at
    7698 Å.
  • Subtract the two spectra and look for significant
    differences
  • Considered a wavelength bin centered on the K
    line at 7698 Å.

38
(No Transcript)
39
  • Calculated the percent differences at each pixel,
    by taking the difference between each spectrum
    and the template spectrum, and dividing by the
    template spectrum.
  • Choosing bins with widths comparable to sizes of
    absorption lines (8 pixels or 10.4 km s-1)
  • In order to average over photon noise, we binned
    the percent differences in wavelengths.
  • Search in the percent deviations as a function of
    orbital phase phase0 corresponds to mid-point
    of transit.

40
(No Transcript)
41
  • Uncertainties
  • To assess uncertainties, we computed the standard
    deviation of the percent differences for 12
    out-of-transit spectra. This represents the level
    of intrinsic fluctuations.
  • A Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was applied to
    the in-transit and out-of-transit residuals.
  • The K-S test suggests that the probability that
    the two samples were drawn from different
    populations is only 0.36.

42
  • ?The K-S test implies that there is no evidence
    for an excess of potassium in the irradiated
    planet atmosphere.

43
  • Searching for lithium
  • The same analysis was applied to the Li I
    resonance doublet at 6707.82 Å.
  • The template spectrum was overplotted on one
    in-transit spectrum, and the difference of the
    two was evaluated.
  • We also considered a 10.4 km s-1 bin at the
    place of the lithium line.

44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
  • The percent deviations for Li do not exceed the
    limit of 3 times the intrinsic fluctuations
    measured in the out-of-transit spectra.
  • The K-S test shows that the in-transit spectra
    are statistically identical to the out-of-transit
    spectra.
  • No excess lithium absorption is seen during
    transit.

47
Possibility of a leading or trailing atmosphere
  • Nontransit observations that are close to the
    transit window, correspond to the ingress and
    egress times.
  • A leading atmosphere could cause contamination in
    the spectra near ingress
  • A trailing atmosphere may be problematic near
    egress
  • A leading/trailing atmosphere could enhance
    absorption when the planet is not transiting

48
  • To investigate the possibility of a
    leading/trailing atmosphere, we modified our
    original analysis of the K and Li lines.
  • We constructed a template spectrum from only 5
    out-of-transit spectra which were clearly not
    near the ingress and egress points.
  • Then, we computed the percent deviations for
    individual observations of the K and Li lines
    relative to the new template, and plotted against
    orbital phase.

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
  • The dashed horizontal lines show boundaries that
    represent three times the RMS scatter in the 5
    non-transit spectra.
  • The K-S test shows that the line depths do not
    vary significantly whether the observations were
    obtained in-transit, near ingress or egress, or
    out of transit.
  • We see no line enhancement that suggests a
    leading or trailing exosphere with a large
    optical depth

52
5. Detectability Simulations
  • What is the required increase in optical depth in
    the planet atmosphere to produce a detectable
    signal?
  • We scaled the K line and the Li line in 1 steps
    for each of our in transit spectra.
  • For each of these pseudo optical depth scaling
    factors, we applied the two-sided K-S test to
    find the probability that the simulated transit
    data were drawn from the same distribution as our
    out-of-transit template.

53
Synthetic data. A 2enhancement in the signal at
the place of the K line.
54
The 2 fake signal would be detected at the 84
confidence level.
55
A 5 fake signal is introduce at the place the K
line.
56
The 5 fake signal would be detected at the
98.83 confidence level
57
An 8 fake signal is introduced at the place of
the K line.
58
The 8 fake signal would be detected at the
99.47 confidence level.
59
K-S Test for Potassium
60
K-S Test for Lithium
61
(No Transcript)
62
6. Summary and Conclusion
  • Theoretical models of planetary atmospheres
  • close-in giant planets similar to L/T dwarfs
  • Alkali metals such as Na, K ,and Li have dominant
    absorption features in their spectra.
  • We investigated the spectra of HD 149026b
    obtained at Keck, and searched the wavelength
    range of 6500-8000Å.
  • ?Any spectral changes during transit must occur
    below a few percent.

63
  • We specifically studied the K line at 7698 Å, and
    the Li line at 6707.8 Å.
  • In this method the percent deviation between each
    spectrum, and a template comprised of co-added,
    out-of-transit spectra was calculated.
  • ?We applied the K-S test and found no evidence
    for potassium or lithium in the atmosphere of the
    planet.

64
  • Monte Carlo simulations show that deepening the
    spectral lines by just 3 results in a clearly
    detectable signal at 95.16 for both potassium
    and lithium.
  • The lack of variations in the core of K and Li
    might be due to
  • The small ratio of the planet to star radius
  • Thin atmosphere of the planet may make detection
    difficult
  • Having only 5 nontransit observations at points
    far from the ingress and egress
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com