Conducting a Workplace Violence Investigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Conducting a Workplace Violence Investigation

Description:

To provide you with the basic investigative fundamentals to ... 16 million people are ... What was the exact verbiage used in the threat? When did this ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: aw54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conducting a Workplace Violence Investigation


1
Conducting a Workplace Violence Investigation
  • April White
  • Area Manager- Asset Protection
  • 314-331-9801
  • aw2473_at_att.com

2
Our Goal Today
  • To provide you with the basic investigative
    fundamentals to effectively conduct a Workplace
    Violence Investigation

3
Statistics
  • Thousands of employees are harassed, intimidated,
    threatened, and physically attacked in the
    workplace daily
  • 16 million people are harassed annually
  • WPV is the 3rd leading cause of fatal
    occupational injuries
  • U.S. Department of Labor

4
The Cost of Workplace Violence
  • Failure to conduct a sufficient WPV investigation
    can lead to civil litigation
  • Average settlement is over 500,000
  • Average jury verdict 3 million
  • Possible expenses for outside council
  • Loss of productivity

5
Example
  • Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
    (Amtrak 1988) An employee shot and destroyed his
    supervisors kneecap after being reprimanded for
    eating his breakfast off company property when he
    was supposed to be at work. The supervisor sued
    Amtrak for failing to follow its own policy of
    progressive discipline. The employee who shot him
    had committed other acts which demonstrated a
    propensity towards violence, yet these prior
    acts were not recorded. A jury rendered a 3.5
    million verdict in favor of the supervisor which
    was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd
    Circuit.

6
Example
  • Herrick v. Quality Inn Hotel, (California 1993)
    The hotel manager was aware the director of
    security was in violation of the companys weapon
    policy and that he had a criminal history. It
    was confirmed he had weapons in his hotel
    apartment and had been arrested for assaulting
    another employee. The hotel manager failed to
    document the incidents. The security director was
    given a promotion during the mentioned timeframe.
    When the director threatened to blow the head off
    of Herrick, a security guard, the Quality Inn was
    held liable for his actions. The court ruled that
    Quality Inn was aware of, and even ratified the
    security director's actions, as he was promoted.
    The jury awarded Herrick 115,200.

7
Building Your Foundation
  • Every good WPV foundation starts with a sound
    policy
  • The best way to build on your foundation is by
    equipping yourself with the necessary tools and
    skills to conduct a quality WPV investigation
  • Protect the workplace
  • Enforce disciplinary action
  • Support termination
  • Defending yourself
  • Unemployment Hearing
  • Civil litigation

8
Objective
  • To Gather all of the information concerning the
    allegation and subsequently take the necessary
    action to safeguard the workplace
  • Create a checklist
  • Goal of the interviews
  • Identify legal/ EEO issues
  • Identify potential witnesses
  • Identify timeframes and order for interviews
  • Identify documents for review

9
The Bomb
  • I cant take it anymore, I dont know if I can
    continue to work here! I am afraid for my
    safety! Stephanie is constantly threatening me
    and I am afraid she is going to hurt me!

10
Where do you go from here?
11
Victim, Witness, and Subject
  • You need to identify
  • Who was involved
  • What happened
  • When it happened
  • Where it happened
  • Why it happened
  • How it happened
  • Note If imminent danger is present dial 911 and
    conduct an investigation once safety has been
    restored

12
Your Demeanor
  • Build rapport
  • Be supportive
  • Be non-judgmental/ unbiased
  • Show sincere empathy
  • Refer to the 10 tips for Crisis Prevention

13
Interview Etiquette
  • Preparation
  • Develop your line of questioning in advance
  • Be sure to get answers to all of your questions
  • If possible have a witness
  • Two heads are better than one
  • A second note taker
  • Obtain signed statements
  • Include date and time
  • Sign as a witness
  • Document
  • Date and start time of each interview
  • Who was present
  • Keep it confidential- Need to know Basis

14
Interview Etiquette
  • Disclose at the start of the interview the nature
    of the investigation
  • Be appropriately honest about the general purpose
    of the interview and the role the individual
    plays
  • I am investigating an allegation of harassment
    in the workplace and need to speak with you
    regarding your knowledge or involvement in the
    incident

15
Victim Interview Questions (Open and Leading)
  • What has happened to make you feel unsafe in the
    workplace?
  • What has Stephanie done or said to threaten you?
  • What was the exact verbiage used in the threat?
  • When did this behavior start?
  • Why do you feel you are being targeted?
  • How many times has this happened?
  • Do others feel the same way? If so, why?
  • What has your response been when Stephanie does
    this?
  • Were there witnesses to the incident? (who)
  • Have any of your co-workers approached you
    regarding the matter?
  • Where were you when the incident occurred?

16
Questions
  • What was the triggering event to cause this last
    incident?
  • Are you aware of any weapons Stephanie may have?
  • Are you aware of any problems Stephanie may be
    having outside of work?
  • What do you think is needed to restore your
    feeling of safety in the workplace?

17
Interview Techniques
  • Show me how employee B touched or shoved you
  • How close were you
  • Did she hit you with her right or left hand
  • How did she try to block you
  • Use measuring scales to define the intensity
  • Show me the way Stephanie looked at you

18
Witness Interviews
  • Keep in mind that if your witness saw the
    incident and it involved physical violence they
    may be fearful and hesitant to speak with you
  • Reassure them
  • Goal is to restore peace and safety in the
    workplace
  • Dont promise something you cant deliver
  • Anonymity

19
Witness InterviewsGeneral Questions
  • What is your general perception on the safety of
    your work environment?
  • Are you aware of any problems or conflict within
    your group?
  • Have you seen any inappropriate or offensive
    behavior in the workplace?
  • Have you heard any rumors that are cause for
    concern?
  • Remember to tread lightly, the individual may
    have no direct knowledge of the alleged incident
  • If the witness saw the incident- refer to
    interview techniques
  • Show me how it was done
  • With what intensity
  • Use measuring scales

20
Witness Interview Direct Questions
  • We were advised that you were a potential witness
    to an incident that occurred on 4/12/06 at 200
    p.m. between employee A B. Did you see an
    disturbing interaction between these two
    employees?
  • Did you see them talking at all during this time?
  • What has been your perception of the interaction
    between the two employees?
  • Have you heard any buzz around the department
    regarding either employee.
  • Note Always document the date and approximate
    time of any incident witnessed

21
Subject InterviewConsiderations
  • Remember
  • They will guarded and may not cooperate
  • Dont disclose too much to soon
  • Consider Weingarten if you have union employees

22
Subject Interview
  • What is your personal perception of the work
    environment?
  • How do you feel about employee A?
  • Has he or she ever done anything to offend you?
    How did that make you feel?
  • Do you feel the workplace is safe?
  • What was the last interaction you had with the
    person?
  • An allegation has been made against you involving
    employee A and I need you to help me
    understand what happened?
  • Remember
  • To utilize Interview Techniques
  • To document the date and time of any reported
    incidents

23
Subject Interview
  • They dont always cooperate
  • Help me to understand why there are several
    witness that have confirmed your involvement, yet
    you say this never happened?
  • If you didnt do this, what motive would someone
    have to file a false report against you?

24
Results of the Investigation
  • Allegation
  • Substantiated
  • Cleared
  • Inconclusive

25
What do I do if the Results were Inconclusive?
  • Word against Word
  • No witnesses
  • Harassment or Bullying Behavior
  • No apparent tangible evidence
  • Evaluate
  • Compare statements
  • Look for discrepancies consistencies
  • Dont dismiss rumors
  • Demeanor
  • Witness bias or lack of bias

26
Consider other options
  • Employee records
  • Employee email and instant messages
  • Internet usage
  • Documents on hard drive
  • Office phone/cellular records
  • Analyze date and time on computer systems
  • Swipe card access
  • Public Records (Circuit Clerk)

27
Conclusion
  • Your goal is to find out what happened and how it
    happened so you can prevent it from happening
    again.
  • The Investigative Process is the best tool for
    gaining insight into an allegation of WPV.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com