Title: Overview and Public Health Implications
1Overview and Public Health Implications
- Dori R. Germolec
- Toxicology Forum
- National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences - Environmental Immunology Laboratory
- Laboratory of Molecular Toxicology
- National Toxicology Program
2A System in Balance
Immunosuppression
Immunostimulation
Altered resistance to Infectious Disease and
Neoplasia
Hypersensitivity Autoimmunity
3Phthalate Effects on the Immune System
- Immune Modulation
- Stimulates self reactivity in autoimmune-prone
strains of mice - PPAR ligands appear to stimulate
anti-inflammatory response (although the data are
not entirely consistent) - Induction of IgE and IgG1 antibodies in Balb/c
mice - Lack of effects in Mouse IgE test in B6C3F1 mice
- NC in IgE, IL-4, IL-13
- Hypersensitivity
- Occupational exposures associated with asthma,
rhinitis, respiratory irritancy - Higher concentrations of specific phthalates
associated with persistent allergic symptoms in
children (BBP - rhinitis and eczema DEHP -
asthma). - Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in human
cells in vitro
4Why do certain people develop disease when
exposed to certain drugs or chemicals while
others remain healthy?
Adverse Health Outcome
Exogenous Factors
5Concordance of Disease in Twin Pairs
Disease
Monozygotic
Dizygotic
Type 1 Diabetes 13-39 3-11 Systemic
Lupus 11-24 0-2 Multiple Sclerosis 9-31 3-5 As
thma 13-51 4-26 Allergy 30-65 7-56
6Why do certain people develop disease when
exposed to certain drugs or chemicals while
others remain healthy?
Poor Nutrition
Genetic Vulnerability
Adverse Health Outcome
Exogenous Factors
Obesity
7The Developing Immune System is a Unique Target
for Chemical Insult
- Lineage Development
- Receptor Expression and Rearrangement
- Positive and Negative Selection
- Different pharmacokinetics in embryo, fetuses and
juveniles versus adults - Altered ability to recover from environmental
insult to immune tissues
8Differential Effects following In Utero Exposures
- Rodent Studies
- Fetal rats are susceptible to TCDD-induced
suppression of DTH responses at much lower doses
than adults (Smialowicz, EPA) - Gestational exposure to TCDD alters fetal
lymphocyte development and suppresses bone marrow
hematopoiesis in mice (Gasiewicz, University of
Rochester) - Gestational exposures to low levels of lead
shifts balance to favor Th2 responses (Dietert,
Cornell)
9How do we evaluate the potential for drugs or
environmental chemicals to modulate immune
responses?
Product Development
Public Health
Testing And Evaluation
10Specific Topic Areas in FDA Immunotoxicology
Guidance
- Immunosuppression Effects on the immune system
that result in decreased immune function - Immunogenicity Specific immune reactions
elicited by a drug and/or its metabolites - Hypersensitivity Immunological sensitization
due to a drug and/or its metabolites - Autoimmunity Immune reactions to self-antigens
- Adverse immunostimulation Non-antigen specific
activation of the immune system
11Assessing Potential Respiratory Allergens
- Karol test - Inhalation exposure, respiratory
effects, Guinea pig - Sarlo approach - Guinea Pig
- In vitro reactivity with protein
- In vivo antibody response
- In vivo reactivity
- Structure Activity
- Mouse IgE test
- Cytokine Profiling
12EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines
Immunotoxicity(OPPTS 870.7800)
Immunotoxicity testing for pesticide
registration Currently not required in CFR Title
40 Part 158 Required under proposed change (2005
draft testing rule) Assays Antibody
production Phenotypic analysis Natural Killer
(NK) Cell Function Histopatholgy/Organ Wts
13Immunotoxicology in IRIS Assessments Case-by-Case
- In process
- Phosgene
- Immunosuppression data will be considered in RfC
- Toluene
- Immunosuppression data will be considered in RfD
- Platinum
- Hypersensitivity data will be considered in RfC
- Completed
- Beryllium and related compounds, 1998
- RfC based on
- Chronic Beryllium Disease
- Beryllium-specific lymphocyte proliferation
- Histopathological evidence of granulomas
- Benzene, 2002
- RfC and RfD based on
- Hematotoxicity/Immunotoxicity - Decreased
lymphocyte counts - Also noted
- Reduced host resistance
- Decreased antibody responses
14What can we conclude about the potential for
phthalates to induce or exacerbate allergic
disease?
- Epidemiological studies suggest that phthalate
exposure may be associated with respiratory
effects - In vivo studies in laboratory rodents suggest
that phthalates have the potential to modulate
immune response - What is relevance of the animal data for human
exposures? - Doses needed to show modulation of immune
parameters are much higher than relevant human
exposures - Animals models for respiratory allergy and asthma
may not be predictive of human disease - Differences between humans and animals in the
biological effects of PPAR activation
The data appear to indicate that phthalates may
have the potential to induce subtle changes in
immune measures
15Are Subtle Immune Changes Important?
- NO
- Most immune tests show coefficients of variation
gt30 in a population - Immune system has redundancy
- YES
- CD4 drops gt7 increase in developing AIDS
- High incidence of infections in cardiac
transplants - High incidence of neoplasia in kidney transplants
- Background incidence of infectious diseases
16 Most Appropriate Model Describing the
Relationship
Between
the Host Resistance and Immune Tests
Host Resistance Test
Â
Immune Function Test
Â
Â
Â
PFC
CTL
MLR
ConA
LPS
slg
CD3
CD4
CD8
Thy/BW
L. monocytogenes
L
T
T
L
L
T
T
T
L
T
PYB6 Tumor
L
L
L
L
L
T
L
L
L
L
S. Pneumoniae
T
L
T
L
L
T
L
L
L
N
L linear T- threshold N - neither
Â
Â
17EPA Immunotoxicology Working Group Goals
- Determine if mild-to-moderate alterations in
immune measures in the general or susceptible
populations could lead to adverse effects. Could
economic social impacts be captured? - Establish quantitative relationships between
biomarkers of immune system change and disease in
humans. - Prepare a template/example case study.
18Unique Epidemiological Concerns
- Immune Testing
- Enumeration of cells and secretory products
rather than functional assay - Test results affected by chronic inflammatory
conditions (e.g., CVD), acute stress smoking,
diet, obesity, etc. - Disease Frequency/Severity
- True frequency of disease outcomes difficult to
assess - Self-reported data on is very imprecise,
especially in cross-sectional or retrospective
study designs - Cannot easily control for other factors related
to frequency of infections or disease episodes
19N400
Subjects With Infection ()
70 75 80 85 90 95
Observed Adjusted
3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12
Cohen et al., NEJM, 1991
Psychological-Stress Index
20Increased Frequency of Infections in Children
Exposed to HAH (Dioxins/PCBs)
- Dutch Preschool Children (Weisglas-Kuperus et
al., - EHP 2000)
- Inuit Indians (Dewailly et al., 2000)
- Michigan study (Karmus et al., Arch Envir.
Hlth, 2001) - Japan-Yusho (Hishito et al., EHP, 1985)
- China- Yu-Cheng (Yu et al., Chemosphere, 1998)
21Case Studies Upper Respiratory Infections
(Influenza Pneumonia)
- Death rate 23.0 per 100,000
- Infants 6.5 per 100,000 live births
- Elderly (some est. at 95) 12.3 per 100,000
- Economic Cost of Illness approach
- Deaths, hospitalizations, outpatient or emergency
room visits lost-work days (wages)
22Cost Estimates (in Billions) of Infectious
Diseases for 2000
Illness Total Cost Direct Indirect (medical) (lo
st productivity)
Pneumonia Influenza 25.6 18.6 7.0 Otitis
Media 5.0 2.9 2.1 HIV/AIDS 28.9 13.4 15.5 Septicem
ia 7.2 4.9 2.3 Respiratory
Distress 4.1 3.2 0.9 Syndrome
sources USDHHS and NIH
23Final Thoughts
This may be a case of hazard identification
versus risk The available data suggest that if a
large enough population is exposed and that the
challenge dose or frequency of exposure to
antigen is sufficient, small changes in immune
responses could increase the background incidence
and burden of disease in the human population.