Title: 1) Mx
1Model Problems of Compound Flight
Configuration I
Configuration II
- 1) Mx 1018 project
- B-29/F-84
- 2) Tom-Tom Project
- B-36F/F-84
C-27
C-5
2Wind Tunnel Tests
Tools and Facilities
Finite Element Structures
Flight Controls
Propulsion Studies
Water Tunnel
- Vortex Lattice Calculations
3Calculated C-5 / C-27 Drag Coefficients
d
- Induced drag reduction as tips approach each other
4(No Transcript)
5Effect of Hitchhiker Size on Range
6Mothership/Hitchhiker Attached by Hinge
- Carbon Fiber/foam fixed wing
- Balsa wood hinged wing (NACA 63-420 airfoil)
- has option to add varying masses to the tip of
the hinged wing
Wind Tunnel Experiment
7Normal mode analysis of C-5/C-27C-5 Solo 1st
Bending Mode 1.4 Hz
In plane bending ( New mode)
Mode 1. Torsion , 0.25 Hz
Mode 3. In plane bending , 0.53 Hz
Mode 2. Bending , 0.50 Hz
Mode 4. Bending , 1.20 Hz
Mode 5. In plane ending , 2.11 Hz
8THH/THHsolo1.275
THH/THHsolo1.0
THH/THHsolo0.0
Minimal fuel consumption
Beta mother ship drag benefit a Hitchhiker
drag benefit
Compound Aircraft Transport
9 FE Static Analysis
C-5/C-27 Combined
lb/ft2
Maximum stress
Maximum stress shifted closer to the tip
10All Aircraft get Lift Benefit and Drag Reduction
- Attached Flight system drag is less than
mother ship alone - Formation flight hitchhiker
benefits in lift and drag - Optimal position
hitchhiker behind, inboard and above mother ship
wing
11Attached hitchhikers ride stably and with minimal
control
- Hinged connection should be stable with no need
for active control - - Hitchhikers may turn engines off or operate at
low throttle
12Significant fuel savings
- Hitchhikers ride for free and may even chip in
gas. - Mother ship may save fuel.
- Local minimum fuel consumption can be achieved
with - transport providing all thrust
- or
- by splitting thrust between transport and
hitchhiker
Compound Aircraft Transport
13 Structural modifications are needed to improve
the static and dynamic response of the compound
- Maximum stress shifted towards the tip of the
wing - - Presence of new normal modes of the compound
system
Problems can be solved by structural
reinforcement and/or controls
14Attached or in Formation ?
- Attached
- - a little greater drag benefit
- - with hitchhiker engines off, significant
increase in range - - stable and safe flight with no controls
- Formation
- -flight control nightmare
- - requires running VSTOL engines that are
inefficient for high speeds
15- o Wind tunnel tests with hinged attached
models - o Measure forces and moments
- o Measure unsteady pressures on wing models
- o Monitor the wakes with high
frequency-response 7-hole probes - o Study the flow field with particle-image
velocimetry - o Model the dynamics of hinged aircraft
motion - o Couple aerodynamics with structural codes
to predict aeroelastic behavior - o Employ the codes thus develop in design.
-
16- Structural analysis and design
-
- Detailed high fidelity analysis of
compound aircraft configurations - Steady and unsteady aeroelastic analysis
- Identification of cost effective
structural modification for existing aircraft - Development of design tools for new
aircraft designed specifically for compound
flight - Propulsion
- Expand current engine fuel consumption
analysis to account for various sized transport
and hitchhikers. - Develop engine models to allow
examination of engine configurations to allow
high bleed flow rates. - Integrated computational/experimental
study of the aerodynamics of a CAT - Design code for required camber /twist
and simulation using devices
17 Multidisciplinary Design and
Optimization (MDO)
Evaluation of MDO platforms (e.g. Model Center
Phoenix Integration, insight Ingenious
Software) Parametric
detailed (realistic) structural analysis models
for MDO Identification and coordination
of systems and subsystems variables for
MDO Response surface models for
representation of disciplines within the MDO