Office of Research Integrity and Compliance Institutional Review Board Basics PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 37
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Office of Research Integrity and Compliance Institutional Review Board Basics


1
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance
Institutional Review Board Basics
  • August 14, 2008

Annie Munana, Director ORIC Ellen Brooks, PhD,
IRB Chair April Baker, IRB Manager Melanie Mace,
IRB Manager Johari Harris, Research Compliance
Coord. Patty Zavalza, Research Compliance
Coord. Andrea Slay, Sr. Admin. Asst.
2
Key Definitions of Human Subjects Research
  • RESEARCH - A systematic investigation designed to
    develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
  • CLINICAL TRIAL - A controlled study involving
    human subjects, designed to evaluate
    prospectively the safety and effectiveness of new
    drugs or devices or of behavioral interventions.

3
Key Definitions of Human Subjects Research, contd
  • HUMAN SUBJECTS Individuals whose physiologic or
    behavioral characteristics and responses are the
    object of study in a research projectliving
    individual(s) about whom an investigator
    conducting research obtains (1) data through
    intervention or interaction with the individual
    or (2) identifiable private information
  • INFORMED CONSENT Is a human subjects voluntary
    agreement, based upon adequate knowledge and
    understanding of relevant information, to
    participate in research or to undergo a
    diagnostic, therapeutic, or preventive procedure.

4
Ethical Principles for Human Subjects
The Belmont Report, April 18, 1979
  • RESPECT FOR PERSONS - that individual autonomy be
    respected and that persons with diminished
    autonomy be protected.
  • BENEFICENCE - the obligation to protect persons
    from harm (1) do not harm and (2) protect from
    harm by maximizing possible benefits and
    minimizing possible risks of harm.
  • JUSTICE - requires fairness in distribution of
    burdens and benefits often expressed in terms of
    treating persons of similar circumstances or
    characteristics similarly.

5
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
  • IRB a review body established or designated by
    an entity to protect the welfare of human
    subjects recruited to participate in biomedical
    or behavioral research
  • RESPONSIBILITIES
  • Apply Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Good
    Clinical Practice (GCP) standards for Human
    Subjects Research
  • Review and Approve
  • Require Modification in
  • Disapprove
  • ALL research activities, including proposed
    changes in
  • previously approved human subject research

6
IRB Responsibilities, contd
  • Has the authority to SUSPEND or TERMINATE
    previously approved research that is NOT being
    conducted in accordance with the IRBs
    requirements or under CFR and GCP standards, or
    that has been associated with unexpected serious
    harm to subjects

7
Principal Investigator Responsibilities
  • Comply with Human Subjects Education Requirement
    for themselves as well as key personnel
  • Design and Implement Ethical Research Studies
  • Comply with Code of Federal Regulations and Good
    Clinical Practice Standards
  • Obtain prior IRB Approval and comply with IRB
    requirements
  • Comply with HIPAA Requirements if PHI is accessed
    as part of the research

8
Principal Investigator Responsibilities, contd
  • Implement Research as Approved and Obtain Prior
    Approval for Modifications
  • Obtain Informed Consent/Assent/Authorizations
  • Document Informed Consent/Assent/Authorizations
  • Track study expirations and submit Continuing
    Review progress reports in a timely manner
  • Report Unanticipated Problems
  • Retain Records and Document Activities

9
Types of Submissions
  • Initial Review New Studies
  • Annual Continuing Review
  • Amendments - Revisions
  • Unanticipated Problems
  • Emergent Requests (Medical)
  • Final Report/Inactivations

10
Risk Determinations under Subpart D
  • Protocol are approved under the following
    risk/benefit determination
  • Research not involving greater than minimal risk.
    (45 CFR 46.404)
  • Research involving greater than minimal risk but
    presenting the prospects of direct benefit to the
    individual subjects. (45 CFR 46.405)
  • Research involving greater than minimal risk and
    no prospect of direct benefit to individual
    subjects but likely to yield generalizable
    knowledge about the subjects disorder or
    condition. (45 CFR 46.406)
  • Research not otherwise approvable which presents
    an opportunity to understand, prevent or
    alleviate a serious problem affecting the health
    or welfare of children. (45 CFR 46.407)

11
Informed Consent
  • Process
  • Documentation
  • Alterations and Waivers

12
Informed Consent
  • Use the CMH format and follow all IRB
    requirements
  • Use the current template located on the IRB
    website
  • Signature section in each form is different
  • Version date in footer do not use auto-date
  • Only use IRB-stamped consents
  • Complete all blanks
  • Review IRB policy regarding translated consents
    for non-English speaking families

13
Informed Consent
  • Subjects reaching the age of 12 should sign an
    assent document
  • Subjects reaching the age of majority (18 years
    of age) must re-consent to continue participating
    in research if they were initially enrolled to
    the study by their parent/guardian when they were
    minors.
  • Consent forms should use lay language
    descriptions of common medical terms.

14
HHS Requirements for Waiving Informed Consent
  • IRB must approve and document findings
  • When Permitted
  • Research is no more than minimal risk
  • The rights and welfare of subject are not
    adversely affected
  • Research could not be practicably conducted
    without the waiver
  • Subjects provided with pertinent information
    after participation

15
Wards of the State
  • Any participation of Wards of the State in
    research studies regardless of the risk
    determination must have the prior approval of the
    Department of Children and Family Services
    (DCFS). Any research conducted under 46.406 or
    46.407 must also utilize a Research Subject
    Advocate for each ward to be enrolled. Please
    contact the IRB for guidance prior to enrolling
    Wards of the State on any research study
    regardless of the assigned risk determination.
    The IRB Chair, is the designated Research Subject
    Advocate for CMH. If the Chair is the PI for the
    study, the IRB will appoint an alternate as
    appropriate.

16
IND/IDE
  • Stands for Investigational New Drug/Investigationa
    l Device Exemption
  • If the sponsor hold the IND/IDE number, please
    provide that number in the submission.
  • INDs can also be held by the PI See IRB policy
  • Must secure cross-reference letter from
    drug/device manufacturer
  • PI submits IND/IDE application to FDA
  • Annual reports are required for FDA

17
Investigator-Held IND/IDE
  • Guidance For Evaluation
  • The protocol is NOT intended to be reported to
    the FDA in support of a new indication for use or
    to support any other significant change in the
    labeling for the drug.
  • The protocol is NOT intended to support a
    significant change in the advertising for the
    product.
  • The protocol does NOT involve a change in route
    of administration or dosage level, use in a
    subject population, and other change/factor that
    significantly increases the risks (or decreases
    the acceptability of the risks) associated with
    the use of the drug product.

18
Investigator-Held IND/IDE
  • If the answer to all points are true, then PI
    does not need to submit to FDA.
  • If any point is false, an IND/IDE application is
    required. Contact the FDA regarding application
    process.
  • Provide the IRB with a copy of the FDA
    correspondence issuing the assigned number
  • IRB requires copy of annual report to FDA at the
    time of continuing review

19
Types of Review
  • Exempt
  • Expedited
  • Minimal Risk
  • Full Committee Review
  • Minimal Risk
  • Greater than Minimal Risk

20
Types of Research Eligible for Exempt Review
  • Six Categories special added considerations for
    children
  • Determination made locally to accept categories
  • Research must fall into one or more of the
    categories to be exempt
  • PI cannot make determination. Qualified
    individual makes this determination
  • May still require consent or other safeguards
  • Any changes require IRB re-review

21
Mechanism of ReviewExpedited Research
  • Expedited does not necessarily mean a fast review
    It simply means it does not require full board
    review
  • Review carried out by IRB chair or by one or more
    experienced reviewers
  • Reviewers may approve or modify, but may not
    disapprove
  • Rigor of review the same as for full IRB review
    number or reviewers different
  • Only minimal risk studies in Federally-defined
    categories can be expedited

22
Continuing/Annual Review
  • PIs are responsible for monitoring the approval
    periods for their studies.
  • Must be done no less than annually for ongoing
    studies
  • More frequent review may be necessary for some
    research studies as IRB determines
  • As a courtesy, IRB sends out progress report
    notices approx. 2-3 months prior to the studies
    expiration date
  • If PI holds an IND/IDE for the study, the IND ,
    Date of issuance and a copy of the most recent
    annual report to FDA must be included in the
    submission.

23
Amendments and Revisions
  • Require approval before implemented (unless to
    eliminate immediate safety issue)
  • Evaluate impact of change risk/benefit assessment
  • Minor changes may undergo expedited review
  • Submit a cover letter summarizing the changes and
    tracked and clean versions of revised documents

24
Unanticipated Problems/Adverse Events
  • Serious adverse events or unanticipated events
    that involve risks to others must be reported to
    the IRB in a timely manner
  • Researcher must provide interpretation of events
    and description of precautions taken to prevent
    reoccurrence. You must provide a copy of the
    current consent form for review.
  • Please refer to the IRB Policy for submitting
    unanticipated problems

25
Emergency Requests
  • Patient requires emergent research treatment in
    the event of life threatening situation.
  • No approved IRB Protocol
  • No time for IRB review
  • HHS Regulations do not prevent MD from
    administering treatment in an emergent situation
    Do not consider it prospective research
  • FDA Has procedures report to FDA and IRB within
    5 days, allows informed consent waiver
  • www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/drugsbiologics.htmlemerg
    ency
  • Intended to be used only once

26
Final Report/Inactivations
  • Studies may be closed once all research
    activities have been completed including data
    analysis
  • If the study is part of a large multi-center
    trial, the study may be inactivated once all
    enrolled subjects have completed all research
    interventions and data is no longer being
    submitted to the sponsor
  • Inactivations may be requested at the time of the
    continuing review or may be submitted at any time
    during the year of approval
  • IRB strongly encourages the submission of a final
    report rather than allowing the study to expire

27
Types of Approval
  • Approved without Contingencies
  • Approved with Contingencies
  • - minor directed
  • - major
  • Tabled
  • Disapproved/Rejected

28
Approved without Contingencies
  • No revision is necessary to any submitted
    document
  • Provided all administrative contingencies are
    met, the approval paperwork can be released

29
Approved with Minor Directed Contingencies
  • Requires clarification of an aspect of the study
    or revision to one or several documents
  • May or may not have to be reviewed by the
    convened IRB
  • Directed changes (e.g. editorial changes in
    wording)
  • Non-Directed clarifications or disagreements with
    the proposed directed changes may have to be
    reviewed by the IRB
  • Any contingencies must be resolved before the
    4-month contingency period expires or full
    resubmission of the study is required

30
Approved with Major Contingencies
  • Changes are not directed
  • Eligible for major contingency conference call
  • Response must be complete and submitted by the
    deadline.
  • Conference calls occur outside of regular
    meetings

31
Tabled
  • Usually major issues with the protocol or
    consent documents
  • Requires resubmission of the entire proposal with
    a point by point response to each question
  • Resubmission may occur at any time no
    contingent approval period
  • IRB deadlines must be met for inclusion on the
    next meetings agenda

32
Disapproved/Rejected
  • Similar to Tabled but sends a stronger message
  • May be appealed
  • Resubmission of study is necessary
  • May be resubmitted at any time no contingent
    period

33
Education/Personnel Form
  • To be included in addition to names on OSP form
  • Requires the listing of all research personnel
    who have a significant role in the study
  • All listed personnel must be current in human
    subjects education Requirement for
    certification on IRB website
  • Will be required with every new study and
    continuing review submission
  • Names of certified staff are posted on IRB website

34
IRB STATS FY 2008Expedited Review Submissions
35
IRB STATS FY 2008Full Board Review Submissions

36
IRB UPDATES
  • SAE Submissions for registry or observational
    studies
  • Complete Submissions including Personnel Form and
    potential additional Division and Dept Head
    Signatures
  • IRB Application Form - Coming Soon
  • AAHRPP Application
  • New Policies (proxy consent, Acting PI,
    electronic continuing review notices)

37
Questions and Answers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com