Pink Eye - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Pink Eye

Description:

Reported in the USA since 1889. 45% of Missouri herds have endemic IBK. Average prevalence = 8 ... 150 million yearly. General Information. What causes 'pink eye' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:356
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: srp61
Category:
Tags: eye | pink | yearly

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pink Eye


1
Pink Eye
  • James Reecy
  • Annette OConnor
  • Abebe Hassen
  • Gary Snowder

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
Pink Eye
  • Reported in the USA since 1889
  • 45 of Missouri herds have endemic IBK
  • Average prevalence 8
  • More common in the young 10-60
  • Immunity develops with age
  • No gender affinity

5
How Effective Are We At Controlling Pink Eye?
  • Kansas ranchers reported it as the 2nd most
    common infectious disease in 1993
  • NAHMS diseases with economic impact
  • Internal/ external parasites (way in front)
  • Open cows
  • Pink eye
  • Foot rot
  • Between 17 and 65 lbs decrease in weaning weight
  • 150 million yearly

6
General Information
  • What causes pink eye
  • Moraxella bovis, , is considered to be the
    cause of IBK
  • Gellatt food animal ophthalmology page 1131

7
What Causes Pink Eye
  • Moraxella bovis
  • Brannamella ovis?
  • High UV light
  • Dust
  • IBR infection
  • IBR vaccination
  • Mycoplasma infection Mycoplasma bovoculi
  • Trauma
  • Face flies- Musca autumnalis (since 1946)

8
What Causes Pink Eye?
M. Bovis
UV Light
Long Grass
Stress
9
What Causes Pink Eye?
M. Bovis
UV Light
Face Flies
10
Why Do Only Some Calves Get Pink Eye?
  • Individual differences
  • Genetics
  • Dam colostral immunity

11
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Remove reservoirs for M.bovis
  • Cattle ( sub-clinical carriers)
  • Face Flies, Stable Flies, Horn Flies ( for 3-4
    days)
  • Wildlife ?

12
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Are the technologies up to the job?

13
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Not up to the job
  • Vaccines
  • Fly control
  • Dust control
  • Pasture clipping

14
Options For Control/ Prevention
  • Vaccines
  • Pilated forms of M bovis are virulent allows
    attachment
  • At last count there were 7-8 pili groups, they do
    not provide much cross protection
  • Each pilis type is associated with specific ab
    production
  • Failure in vaccines is due to low cross
    protection and emergence of new pili.
  • Also naturally animals produce lacrimal IgA to M
    bovis, vaccines stimulate serum IgG, IgM, and
    secretory IgA

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Why Does Control/ Prevention Fail?
  • Fly control
  • Adulticides, traps, larvicide's rarely achieve gt
    50 control
  • Due to small amount of time spent on animal
  • At any one time , lt 5 of the entire female
    population ( only females) on cattle
  • Overlapping generations means that traps dont
    work
  • Local migration is easy they moved from Nova
    Scotia to in 1950s to North Dakota in 1960
    renewing populations constantly

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
What The Future Options
  • Genetic selection
  • Improved vaccines
  • Better treatment

23
Assumptions
  • Genetic variation in resistance/ susceptibility
    to the pinkeye exists
  • Low heritability (lt.15)
  • Disease incidence is low 10

24
Requirements of the project
  • Serve as a model for disease resistance/susceptibi
    lity research
  • Internal parasites - nematodes
  • Respiratory
  • Use field records
  • Need to develop data collection scheme
  • Need 8,000 records

25
Data Collection
  • Two seasons
  • When cases are actively observed
  • Weaning
  • Scoring system
  • Data sheets

26
ACTIVE LESIONS SHEET 2
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Current data collection
  • Iowa State Rhodes Research Farm
  • American Angus Association
  • Contacted a few breeders to start collecting data
  • Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Wisconsin
  • Universities
  • Ohio State
  • Kentucky

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Change in Severity Over Time
October Severity Call
August Severity Call
33
October Severity Call
Right
August Severity Call
Left
34
Data Analysis
  • No sex or eye effect
  • Heritability
  • MTDFREML
  • Model Y ? CG animal PE error
  • CG Sex-weaning group (4)
  • PE permanent environmental
  • h2 0.18

35
MARC Pinkeye data
  • Gary Snowder
  • 19 years of data
  • Calves listed as being treated in the herd book
  • Number of records
  • 907 to 10,947 head per breed
  • 1.3 to 22.4 incidence

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Future Direction
  • Moraxella bovis infection rate vs. Corneal
    abrasion
  • Field data collection
  • Mechanism?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com