Title: The Duration Model
1The Duration Model
- Present Value
- PV ?t1 to T CFt / (1i)t
- 1st Derivative w.r.t. discount rate (i)
- implies ?PV -D PV ?i/(1i)
- this is the duration model
- it is an approximation because 1st derivatives
work only for very small changes - where D ?t1 to T (t CFt) / (1i)t / PV
- D is the Macauley duration of the security
- MD D / (1i)
- MD is the modified duration of the security
- implies ?PV/PV -MD ?i
- another version of the duration model
2Meaning(s) of Duration
- Weighted-Average Maturity
- Weights are the relative contribution to the
total value of the security or PVcashflow/PVsecuri
ty - Better way of measuring (and matching) maturity
than date of receipt of last cash flow - Measure of Interest Rate Risk
- MD is an elasticity w.r.t. changes in the
discount rate. - ?PV/PV -MD ?i
3Calculating Duration
4Duration Model vs. Reality
- Duration is a linear approximation of a
non-linear world. - The approximation gets worse as the interest rate
change grows larger - The difference between the actual change in value
and the duration prediction is due to convexity
5Duration of a Portfolio
- The duration of a portfolio is the
weighted-average duration of the individual
securities. - MDportfolio ?j1 to J wj MDj
- The weights equal the contribution of the
security to the value of the portfolio - wj PVj/PVportfolio
- As required, the weights sum to one
- ?j1 to J wj 1
- Example Portfolio with 3 securities
- 10K of Bond A (MD 6.3 years)
- 55K of Bond B (MD 2.7 years)
- 35K of Bond C (MD 0.4 years)
- weight of Bond A 10/(105535) 0.10
- MDportfolio (0.10 6.3) (0.55 2.7) (0.35
0.4) 2.26 years
6Convexity
- The duration model (?PV/PV -MD ?i) is only an
approximation. - As ?i gets larger, the error grows.
- Can we improve on this? Yes.
- ?PV/PV -MD ?i ½C ?i²
- C is the convexity of the security
- Calculated in a manner similar to MD (more
complex formula) - based on 2nd derivative w.r.t. discount rate
7Convexity
- Positive Convexity
- for the typical bond, C gt 0
- gains are bigger for decrease in rates than loss
for same increase in rates - when Cgt0 the duration model is conservative
- actual gains and losses are less than predicted
by duration model - Negative Convexity
- for some securities, C lt 0
- we call this negative convexity
- BAD gains are smaller for decrease in rates than
loss for same increase in rates - when Clt0 the duration model underestimates losses
and overestimates gains - only happens when CFs change with changes in
interest rates - mortgage portfolios act this way
8Convexity
- Why isnt convexity used in practice?
- Impractical
- Cannot calculate the convexity of a portfolio
from the convexity of its individual securities.
9Duration of Equity
- According to the balance sheet identity
- Assets Liabilities Equity
- Equity Assets Liabilities.
- Using this identity to reflect PV rather than
Book Value - PVequity PVassets PVliabilities
- a.k.a. the Economic Value of Equity or EVE
- Not the same as market value
- Equity is a portfolio containing positive assets
and negative liabilities. - MDequity (PVassets/PVequity)MDassets
(PVliabilities/PVequity)MDliabilities
10Duration of Equity Examples
- Example 1
- PV Assets of 500 million (MD 3.5 years)
- PV Liabilities of 450 million (MD 2.5 years)
- EVE 50 million
- MDequity (500/50)3.5 (450/50)2.5 12.50
years. - What happened?
11Duration of Equity Examples
- Example 2
- PV Assets of 500 million (MD 2.5 years)
- PV Liabilities of 450 million (MD 3.5 years)
- EVE 50 million
- MDequity (500/50)2.5 (450/50)3.5 -6.50
years. - Negative Duration?
12Advantages of Duration Model
- Single Number easy to interpret
- bigger riskier
- positive implies hurt by rising interest rates
- Easy to Explain
- Senior management
- Easy to Calculate
- Spreadsheet technology
- Unambiguous
- Set targets or limits
- Rough but consistent
- For small interest rate changes
13Disadvantages of Duration Model
- Assumes Parallel Interest Rate Shocks
- All rates move by same amount
- Instantaneously and permanently
- What is short and long rates move differently?
- Linear Model
- Non-linear world cant translate convexity to
portfolio level - Embedded Options
- Model only considers promised cash flows (can be
adjusted to expected cash flows) - Does not capture changing cash flows
- Off-Balance Sheet Activities
- Fee income sources may be sensitive to changing
market rates
14Improvements on Duration Model
- Quasi-Assets
- solution for ignoring OBS activities
- estimate future cash flows and appropriate
discount rate and calculate value/duration - treat fee-based activity as an asset with
predictable, periodic cash flows.
15Improvements on Duration Model
- Effective duration
- used when cash flows are known to change when
interest rates change (e.g. embedded options are
present) - manipulate ?PV/PV -MD ?i
- to get EMD -(?PV/PV) / ?i
- EMD is the effective (implied) modified duration
- Employ complex ( accurate) valuation model
- measure value under current interest rates
- measure value for fixed increase in interest
rates use that ?PV to measure EMD() - measure value for (same) fixed decrease in
interest rates use that ?PV to get EMD(-) - EMD average of EMD() and EMD(-)
- not precise but better than strict duration model
which assumes cash flows dont change
16Improvements on Duration Model
- Effective duration example
- portfolio of asset-backed securities
- value under current conditions is 5.00 million
- value if interest rates increase by 0.25 is
estimated at 4.40 million - EMD() -(-0.60/5.00)/0.0025 48.0
- value if interest rates decrease by 0.25 is
estimated at 5.35 million - EMD(-) -(0.35/5.00)/-0.0025 28.0
- EMD (48.0 28.0) / 2 38.0
17Improvements on Duration Model
- Key Rate Duration
- solution to problem of assuming parallel interest
rate shocks (all rates change permanently by same
amount at same time) - measure the sensitivity of each asset to
- short-term riskless yield
- a set of differences between the short-term
riskless yield and riskless yields associated
with different maturities - An Example measure independent sensitivities to
- 3-month CMT
- 1-year CMT - 3-month CMT
- 5-year CMT - 1-year CMT
- 20-year CMT - 5-year CMT
- these should be independent of one-another
- CMT constant maturity Treasury
18Scenario Analysis
- Requires accurate valuation model
- (1) Identify key inputs to valuation model
economic factors - various interest rates
- volatility of rates
- default expectations/credit spreads
- (2) Select a set of predetermined alternative
future conditions - example of one scenario rates rise, interest
volatility increases, rising default/credit
spreads - pick other representative sets of input values
- focus on interest rates
- parallel shocks
- tilts
- twists
19Scenario Analysis
- (3) Measure the value of the portfolio or
institution for each scenario using the
valuation model - (4) Look for unacceptable losses
- identify cause(s)
- fix problems
- Advantage compared to duration
- allows more complex valuation
- considers additional sources/causes of risk
- Disadvantages compared to duration
- less clear
- cant tell if an important scenario is missing
20Simulation Models/Analysis
- Requires accurate valuation model
- (1) Identify key inputs to valuation model
- various interest rates
- volatility of rates
- default expectations/credit spreads
- (2) Identify the probability distribution of each
key input, including parameters - example joint normal distribution assumption
requires estimates of mean, standard deviation,
and correlations for each variable - other distributions can be more complex with more
parameters - (3) Randomly select a set of values for the key
inputs to the valuation model - based on distributional assumptions in (2)
21Simulation Models/Analysis
- (4) Using the key input values
- for each security (face value, coupon rate,
maturity, contractual features known), determine
a value - (5) Repeat (3) and (4) a lot!
- 1,000 times
- (6) Study the results of this simulation
- dont worry about gains or small losses
- big losses? ask why? how many? too many?