Title: Natural Hazard Modeling
1Natural Hazard Modeling
- Techniques for Measuring Earthquake, Wind and
Other Risks
2What is Computer-Based Natural-Hazard Modeling?
- Knowledge-based computer models
- Used for assessing risks (likelihood and
severity) - Best suited for complex exposures like
earthquake, hurricane, flood, tornado, pandemic,
terrorism...
3How Modeling is Used
- Estimating facility equipment damage
- Estimating downtime
- Estimating injuries
- Analyzing regional exposures
4Overview of the Process
- On-site data collection
- Computer modeling
- Choose EQ scenarios
- Estimate shaking intensity
- Calculate damage, downtime, etc
- Data analysis and reporting
5On-Site Data Collection
- Primary
- Construction type
- Year
- Height
- Address
- Occupancy type
6On-Site Data Collection (2)
- Secondary
- Shape
- Contents damageability
- Ornamentation
- Construction quality
- Fatigue/maintenance...
7On-Site Data Collection (3)
- Retrofits
- Bracing of key pieces of equipment
8On-Site Data Collection (4)
- Fire following
- Sprinkler leakage
9Computer Modeling
- Database of earthquake faults (or hurricane
tracks) - Expected likelihood and magnitude
- Choose scenarios
10Hayward Fault
11Computer Modeling (2)
- Attenuation function
- Database of soil types (or ground roughness)
- Determine shaking intensity at each site (or
windspeed)
12Computer Modeling (3)
- Engineering tables estimate the damage, based on
construction features and shaking intensity - Secondary modifiers
13Outputs/Results
- Probable Maximum Loss
- Maximum Credible Earthquake
- Likelihood of experiencing small loss, medium
loss, large loss - Damage extent
- Downtime
- Dollar loss
14Outputs/Results (2)
- Equipment damage
- Earthquake scenarios
- Vulnerabilities
- Cost-benefit of retrofits
- Damage at primary-site vs secondary site
- Damage/downtime at each different facility
15Outputs/Results (3)
- Sprinkler leakage
- Fire following
- Storm surge
16Deliverables
- Loss estimates
- Recommendations for risk improvement
- Equipment damage
- Fire following
- Sprinkler leakage
- Earthquake scenarios
- Chart of magnitude vs. likelihood
17Common Models
- RMS EQ, Hurricane (including storm surge),
Pandemic, Tornado, Hail, Flood, Terrorism - AIR EQ, Hurricane, Terrorism, Tornado, Hail,
Flood, Winter-storm - EQE EQ, Hurricane, Tornado, Hail, Terrorism,
Wildfire, Winter-storm - St Risk EQ
- FEMA EQ, Hurricane, Flood
18Other Models
- MunicRe EQ, Hurricane, Flood
- LANL Pandemic, Wildfire
- DHS Pandemic
- Others Sinkhole, Toxic Plume, Fire/Smoke,
Nuclear...
19Pandemic Modeling
- Information about your organization
- Headcount
- Geography
- Age and other demographics
- Historic data about past pandemics
- Infection rates
- Illness severity
- Mortality
- Scenarios based on
- 1800 different scenarios
- Likelihood vs severity
- Governments ability to implement response plans
20Pandemic Modeling (2)
- Absenteeism
- Week-by-week impacts
- Impacts of countermeasures
- Surge demand for IT
21Terrorism Modeling
- Location and headcount
- Thousands of U.S. targets
- Proximity to targets
- Potential attack modes bomb blast, aircraft,
CBRN - Neighborhood data (construction type, stories,
size)
22Terrorism Modeling (2)
- Property damage
- Downtime
- Injuries and fatalities
- Impacts of countermeasures
- Frequency and severity
23Drivers for Choosing a Model
- Hazards to be analyzed
- EQ
- Wind
- Flood
- Pandemic
- Terrorism
- Wildfire
24Drivers for Choosing a Model (2)
- Number of facilities
- Single-site
- Campus
- Several facilities in 1 region
- 100's of facilities
25Drivers for Choosing a Model (3)
- What type of result is needed
- Downtime (weeks)
- Vulnerabilities and recommendations
- Cost-Benefit for retrofiting/upgrades
- Damage
- loss
26Drivers for Choosing a Model (4)
- Purpose for the modeling
- Risk transfer (insurance)
- Risk mitigation (retrofits/upgrades)
- Risk avoidance (site selection)
27Other Drivers
- Unusual facilities
- Electrical lines, bridge, underground piping,
outdoor equipment/tanks, towers - Location
- International
- U.S. regions
28How BC Professionals Can Use These Models
- Risk/vulnerability assessment
- Damage prediction
- Downtime
- Planning scenarios
- How many locations can be impacted at once
- Are facilities geographically remote enough...
29How BC Professionals Can Use These Models (2)
- Risk Mitigation
- Retrofits
- Fire following
- Sprinkler leakage
- Cost-benefit of mitigation options
- Data to support specific pandemic response
programs
30How BC Professionals Can Use These Models (3)
- Risk Avoidance
- Site selection for primary sites
- Back-up facilities
- Sites sufficiently remote?
- EOC site selection...
31How BC Professionals Can Use These Models (4)
- Risk transfer (insurance)
32Case Study - Pharmaceutical
- Potential impacts at 2 separate sites
- Downtime estimates
- Risk mitigation (fire-following, sprinkler
leakage) - Cost-benefit of structural upgrade
33Case Study Drug RD
- Extent of damage for each building a campus
arrangement - Downtime estimates
- Planning scenarios
34Case Study Construction Materials Manufacturer
- Estimation of damage to critical equipment
- Downtime for critical equipment
- Simultaneous impacts at 2 separate sites?
- Impacts to critical infrastructure (electrical
distribution, gas-piping, water mains)