Geochemical and Geophysical Applications to ASR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Geochemical and Geophysical Applications to ASR

Description:

ASR is an exciting and effective means of managing water for storage and later use ... with colloidal and microcrystalline iron sulfide, ferric hydroxide, and clay ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: samupc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geochemical and Geophysical Applications to ASR


1
Geochemical and Geophysical Applications to ASR
  • Concerns and Data Gaps

Sam B. Upchurch Thomas L. Dobecki SDII Global
Corporation Tampa, Florida April 2003
2
Introduction
  • ASR is an exciting and effective means of
    managing water for storage and later use
  • There are several issues that, in our opinion,
    have not been adequately addressed
  • These deal with
  • Characterization of the injectate bubble,
  • Monitoring designs, and
  • Geochemical reactions operative in the aquifer

3
Historic Concerns
  • Potentials for drift of injectate away from
    control of ASR system
  • Increasing concentrations of gross alpha
    (polonium-210), arsenic, and other constituents
    in injectate
  • Potential plugging and loss of storage capacity
  • Microbial activity

4
Geologic Controls
5
Example
  • Connected fractures and caverns are usually
    coated with colloidal and microcrystalline iron
    sulfide, ferric hydroxide, and clay
  • Dissolution releases arsenic, polonium, and other
    constituents

6
Needs
  • Predict porosity type and distribution
  • Predict plume movement
  • Monitor for accurate physical behavior of plume
  • Avoid or correct for adverse chemical conditions

Solutions involve early understanding of geologic
controls and a well-designed monitoring plan
7
Injectate Bubble Characterization
  • The configuration of the mass of injectate in the
    aquifer has been the subject of much debate
  • Unfortunately, little has been done to resolve
    the shapes of injectate masses (geometries are
    probably site specific)
  • The shape of the injectate mass (the bubble)
    has significant implications as to fluid behavior
    (chemistry and amount recovered) and monitoring
    (detection, safety)

8
The Ideal Bubble
  • The ideal bubble is more or less a flattened
    sphere
  • The concept requires that several conditions
    exist in the injection zone

9
The Ideal Bubble (cont.)
  • Assumes more-or-less isotropic materials
  • Permeability
  • KH KV rough sphere
  • KH lt KV squashed sphere
  • Injectate fills intergranular porosity, so
    waterrock interface surface area is
  • Very high and
  • Chemical reactions should progress moderately
    because of high grain surface areas
  • Residual fluids are probable

10
Monitoring an Ideal Bubble
  • Monitoring is simple
  • Leads to radial plan
  • If ideal bubble is present, extent is the only
    issue

11
Ideal Bubble Movement
  • Ground-water movement can cause bubble to shift
    down gradient

12
Ideal Bubble Movement
  • Radial design may miss
  • Extent and/or
  • Orientation of plume

13
Bubble Buoyancy
  • Buoyancy issues cause bubble to migrate out of
    injection zone
  • Monitoring designs should account for such events

14
The Ganglion Model
  • Injectate moves along bedding planes, caverns,
    fractures
  • System is anisotropic
  • KH gtgt KV,
  • KH1 gtgt KHH2

15
Ganglion Model
  • Surface area in contact with injectate is
    relatively low
  • Chemical reactions inhibited unless colloids
    present
  • Monitoring difficult to predict
  • Need to guide monitoring plan

16
Glangion Movement
  • Compounds monitoring difficulty
  • May exaggerate extent of plume

17
Data Gaps and Concerns
  • Traditional monitoring may limit understanding
    and detection of injectate
  • Prior knowledge of isotropy and porosity
    distribution important to monitoring design
  • Porosity distribution important to controlling
    reaction rates and access to constituents of
    concern

18
Suggested Approaches
  • Accurate photolineament studies with deep
    geophysical ground-truthing (seismic profiling)
  • Video and geophysical borehole logs to
    characterize fractures, porosity types, and
    fracture fill (if possible)
  • Modeling (Monte Carlo simulations of fractures,
    flow modeling, geochemical modeling) of
    worst-case scenarios for transport prior to
    monitoring design

19
Suggested Approaches (cont.)
  • Cross-hole geophysics (seismic, electrical
    tomography) for block-of-rock characterization
  • Surface geophysics (transient electromagnetic
    sounding, controlled source audio magnetotelluric
    profiling, etc.) to develop a flexible monitoring
    program that can move with the bubble
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com