Palisades School District - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Palisades School District

Description:

Broaden the scope and intensity of the review process to include administrators, ... Administrators: Portia Brandt, Andrea Farina, Bridget O'Connell, Jason Potten, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: GaryA150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Palisades School District


1
Palisades School District
  • Math Study Group Findings Presentation
  • April 2, 2008
  • (Board Discussion Agenda Item
  • April 16, 2008)

2
Rationale for Math Study Team
  • Broaden the scope and intensity of the review
    process to include administrators, counselors,
    math teachers and a science teacher.
  • Address parental concerns and include them in the
    curriculum review process.
  • Create a feedback loop which included the K-12
    math department, math study team and the board to
    increase student achievement and assist the board
    in making curricular decisions.

3
Purpose
  • The purpose of this study team is to ensure that
    we are preparing all students with both the
    mathematical skills as well as deep knowledge and
    understanding necessary to succeed in their
    post-secondary endeavors.

4
Math Study Group Membership
  • Teachers/Counselors Lea Becker, Natalie Conrad,
    Allison Flannery, Mike Flynn, Joan Frick, Clare
    Hennigan, Amy Hitcho, Todd Kellman, Nancy Krial,
    Monica Losinno, Nancy Pontier, Terry Rauch, Jade
    Scholl, Jeanne Smith, and Sandy Young.
  • Parents Donna Barkey-Trotta, Dana Guerra, Patty
    Smeland, Stephen Willey
  • Administrators Portia Brandt, Andrea Farina,
    Bridget OConnell, Jason Potten, Rich Heffernan,
    (Francis Barnes ex officio)

5
Process
  • K-12 math department initiated the curriculum
    review process during the spring and summer of
    2007
  • Math study group generated four areas for further
    study after its review, conducted research and
    proposed recommendations.
  • All recommendations and action plans were then
    shared with all elementary teachers and 6-12 math
    teachers for feedback. Revisions were reviewed a
    final time by the math study team.
  • Final presentation was shared with Educational
    Programs and Services for discussion and
    feedback.
  • Revisions based on EPS feedback are being shared
    tonight. Italicized print indicates an area
    included based on EPS feedback.

6
Recommendations
  • Goal 1 Increase mathematics SAT scores
  • Rationale Increasing math SAT scores will
    improve students opportunities to access select
    post-secondary educational institutions. 
    Furthermore, a recent PDE correlation study
    indicates that students who score well on the
    math SAT also score well on math PSSA exams.
  • All 10th grade students will take the October
    administration of the PSAT during school hours at
    district expense
  • Offer SAT math preparation as a high school
    elective course in 9th and 10th grade at student
    cost, not weighted, Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory
    grading
  • Incorporate math SAT question of the day (as
    found on the College Board website) into math
    courses (Algebra 1 Pre-Calculus/Advanced
    Algebra Trig)
  • Imbed SAT skills into K-12 curriculum map
  • Offer SAT prep parent workshops prior to back to
    school nights at high school and middle school

7
Recommendations
  • Goal 2 Articulate K-12 curriculum and
    assessments
  • Rationale A well articulated curriculum
    maximizes student learning opportunities by
    eliminating both gaps and redundancies in both
    curriculum and instruction.
  • Develop K-12 curriculum map consistent with state
    standards, assessment anchors, SAT math concepts,
    NCTM focal points
  • Implement consistent K-12 course sequence map
  • Develop course placement rubrics for transitions
    from elementary to middle and from middle to high
    school
  • Require a minimum of 60 minutes of math every day
    for all students grades1-12. Kindergarten is only
    a half day preventing a similar requirement.
  • Hire two math specialists, one elementary and one
    secondary, to monitor curriculum and support
    teachers. Determine through the budgeting process
    if action can occur sooner than the 2010-2011
    school year.

8
Recommendations
  • Goal 3 Imbed support and enrichment for
    mathematics
  • Rationale Our mission statement commits us to
    provide support and enrichment in mathematics for
    students in need of intervention.
  • Implement a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model.
    Support and enrichment should utilize different
    strategies and approaches to meet the individual
    needs of the child.
  • Evaluate the number of teachers and teaching
    assistants available for student enrichment and
    support.
  • Articulate interventions at the secondary level.
  • Research and possibly implement co-teaching at
    the elementary level based on research findings
    and resources

9
Recommendations
  • Goal 4 Increase support and communication in
    math education for parents
  • Rationale Positive results of parental
    involvement include improved student achievement,
    reduced absenteeism, improved behavior, and
    restored confidence among parents in their
    children's schooling.
  • Emphasize necessity of both strong math skills
    and a deep knowledge and understanding of
    mathematics through curriculum guides
  • Host math nights and/or parent workshops
    including an SAT math preparation workshop at
    PALMS and PHS for parents and students
  • Post curriculum documents (curriculum maps,
    pacing guides, course expectations, etc) on
    Palisades School District website
  • Include curriculum documents (curriculum maps,
    pacing guides, course expectations, etc) for
    distribution at Back to School Night
  • Create a math parent handbook

10
Recommendations
  • Goal 5 Create and implement a comprehensive
    professional development plan for teachers and
    paraprofessionals based on consistent program
    delivery, best practices and student intervention
  • Rationale Improving teachers skills and
    knowledge is one of the most effective ways of
    increasing student achievement.
  • Time and training to develop common course/grade
    level assessments
  • Time to learn and share best practices with
    colleagues
  • Develop a K-12 curriculum map consistent with
    state standards, assessment anchors, SAT math
    concepts, NCTM focal points
  • Develop course placement rubrics for transitions
    from elementary to middle and from middle to high
    school
  • Incorporate math SAT questions of the day (as
    found on the College Board website) into math
    courses (Algebra 1 Pre-calculus/Advanced
    Algebra Trig)
  • Proctor training for PSAT
  • Implement a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model.
    Support and enrichment should utilize different
    strategies and approaches to meet the individual
    needs of the child
  • Articulate interventions at the secondary level

11
Action Plans
  • Supplemental documentation contains
  • 5 year action plans for each recommendation
  • Yearly and overall budget
  • End of cycle evaluation measures
  • Five year overall budget
  • K-12 mathematics sequence

12
Thank you again to the math study team!
  • Teachers/Counselors Lea Becker, Natalie Conrad,
    Allison Flannery, Mike Flynn, Joan Frick, Clare
    Hennigan, Amy Hitcho, Todd Kellman, Nancy Krial,
    Monica Losinno, Nancy Pontier, Terry Rauch, Jade
    Scholl, Jeanne Smith, and Sandy Young.
  • Parents Donna Barkey-Trotta, Dana Guerra, Patty
    Smeland, Stephen Willey
  • Administrators Portia Brandt, Andrea Farina,
    Bridget OConnell, Jason Potten, Rich Heffernan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com