Basic Research Methods in Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Basic Research Methods in Psychology

Description:

Why do you need to know about communicating research? To be able to write your own papers ... What are the germinal ideas in this area. What is the 'problem' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: scottwat
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Basic Research Methods in Psychology


1
PSY 301
Communicating Psychological Research
2
PSY 301
Steps in a research project
1) Formulate a testable hypothesis
2) Design the study - choose the method
participants
3) Collect the data
4) Analyze the data, make conclusions
5) Publish/Report the findings
3
PSY 301
Why do you need to know about communicating
research?
To be able to write your own papers
To be able to read others papers
- to know where to find the information in the
paper
This is why there are standardized writing
formats (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc).
4
PSY 301
APA Style
THE source is the Publication Manual (APA)
Outlines the details to instruct authors how to
prepare a manuscript for submission to an APA
journal for consideration for publication.
5
Writing
  • Write to a knowledgeable person not in not in
    this class
  • Simply, clearly, and briefly
  • Outline
  • Edit
  • Read aloud

6
Main Parts of a Paper
  • Title Page
  • (page break)
  • Abstract
  • (page break)
  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • (page break)
  • References
  • (page break)
  • Tables (page breaks)
  • Figure Captions
  • (page break)
  • Figures (page breaks)

7
Title
  • GOAL - Give someone a rough idea of what the
    paper is about so that they know whether to read
    the abstract

8
(No Transcript)
9
Abstract
  • Goal - Convey the gist of the study. Why you did
    it. How you did it. What you found. What it
    means.

10
Abstract
  • 120 words
  • Self-contained
  • e.g., electronic databases
  • Reader should know the basics of what you did and
    what you found, so they know whether to read the
    paper
  • A sentence or two from each part of the paper
  • Introduction - Purpose
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion/conclusions

11
(No Transcript)
12
Introduction
  • Goals
  • Provide the necessary background so that the
    reader can understand/appreciate what is to come.
  • Build an ARGUMENT for why the experiment needs to
    be conducted (why the question needs to be
    answered)
  • State the question

13
Introduction
  • Begin with title
  • Background
  • Not an exhaustive literature review or history
  • What are the germinal ideas in this area
  • What is the problem
  • What are the specific studies that led to your
    work
  • Build the case for your experiment using the
    previous literature and ideas, and a rational
    argument

14
Introduction
  • Purpose/rationale for you experiment
  • State toward the end
  • Briefly state your hypotheses and the specific
    manipulations you will use to test those
    hypotheses
  • What results did you expect

15
Introduction
  • You are telling the story of why you did this
    experiment
  • It should be readable
  • But, its not a textbook or a history
  • Its an ARGUMENT, not a book report

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Method Section
  • Goal
  • Allow someone to replicate study.
  • ALL the ESSENTIAL details.

19
PSY 301
General-to-specific organization of the
introduction
20
Subjects/Participants Subsection
  • How many
  • How selected
  • Payment/compensation
  • Demographics
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Special Circumstances
  • Mortality?

21
Materials/Apparatus Subsection
  • What were the essential physical parts of
    method
  • Equipment
  • Model Numbers
  • Software
  • Publication information
  • Stimulus Materials

22
Procedure Subsection
  • What You did
  • Design
  • Conditions/treatments
  • Counterbalancing
  • What happened to subjects
  • Special instructions
  • Paraphrase
  • Deception
  • Step by step
  • Sessions, Blocks, Trials, Breaks
  • Stimuli

23
Procedure Subsection
  • What You did
  • Debriefing
  • Sometimes COMPLEX statistical analyses included
    in a procedure section

24
PSY 301
The reason for detailed method section
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Results
  • Present major findings
  • Good, Bad, and Ugly, But not the irrelevant
  • Provide Detail
  • Means, STDs
  • Figures, Tables, Text
  • Statistics (APA pp. 137-139)

28
Discussion
  • May want to restate findings
  • What do they mean?
  • Re hypotheses
  • Re previous literature
  • Re theory
  • Problems - dont get carried away
  • Future studies

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
PSY 301
General-to-specific organization of the
discussion (APA style)
32
PSY 301
Hourglass structure of a paper. A paper goes
from general to specific back to general.
Mitchell et al., p. 50
33
PSY 301
Hourglass structure of a paper
34
PSY 301
References
A list of all the other work that you
referred/talked about in the paper.
  • APA has specific formats for references that
    differ based on if its an article, book, chapter,
    online source, etc.
  • Section labeled References

35
PSY 301
Reference types
Journal article by one author Thompson, L.
(1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes
Empirical evidence and theoretical issues.
Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532. Journal
article by two authors Loesche, L. S., Tsai,
S. D. (1998). Beneficial effects of caffeine on
writing style. Human Behavior, 5, 1-43. Journal
article, more than six authors Wolchik, S. A.,
West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.,
Coatsworth, D., Lengua, L., et al. (2000). An
experimental evaluation of theory-based mother
and mother-child programs for children of
divorce. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 68, 843-856.
36
PSY 301
Reference types
Book chapter Booth, D. A. (1980). Conditioned
reactions in motivation. In F. M. Toates T. R.
Hall (Eds.), Analysis of motivational processes
(pp. 77-102). New York Academic
Press. Book Toates, F. M., Hall, T. R.
(Eds.). (1980). Analysis of motivational
processes. New York Academic Press.
37
PSY 301
Citations in text
Smith and Jones (1968) showed that thinking about
reference formats is boring. Thinking about
reference formats is boring (Smith Jones,
1968). More than 2 authors First time Smith,
Jones, and Young (1999) found After first
time Smith et al. (1999) found More than 5
authors First time Smith, et al. (2002) found
38
(No Transcript)
39
PSY 301
Writing is not easy - even if its not on rock
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com