Title: Review of Funding to the Voluntary Sector 3 September 2004
1Review of Funding to the Voluntary Sector3
September 2004
- County Council context Pratima Dattani
- Consultant overview Kate Stafford Smith
- Proposed Kettering Borough Model Valerie
Hitchman
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
2Proposed Kettering Borough Model
- Objectives of the meeting-
- Understand the model
- Explore how it could work
- Able to respond to the consultation
- Know the timetable
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
3Objectives of the Review
- Grants allocations that result in improved
customer services - Clear and transparent process
- Funding linked to corporate objectives
- Supportive working partnership with the
organisations we fund - Service convergence with the voluntary sector
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
4Perceived Strengths
- Grants are paid in advance and quickly
- Grants pay core income
- 3 year agreements allow some stability for
business planning - Standardising forms with other funders
- Access to councillors and officers
- Kettering hosting informational seminars
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
5Perceived Weaknesses
- Difficulties in matching Council objectives with
yours - Lack of transparency
- Inconsistent involvement of councillors and
officers - Lack of a voluntary sector infrastructure agency
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
6Proposed Funding Process
Decision-making Process
Direction Setting / Monitoring
Set KBC Priorities
Application Process
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
7Proposed Funding Principles
- Publish KBC priorities and budgetary expectations
as early as possible - Ask organisations to bid against the outcomes the
Council desires a form of commissioning - Help applicants map their services to Council
priorities - Move emphasis away from monitoring towards
direction setting
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
8Set KBC Priorities
- Members make strategic decisions on total
funding, priorities, and funding emphasis - SLAs are aligned to electoral cycle (ie 4 yr
grant regime) - Voluntary sector is informed at an early stage in
the budget cycle - Officers advertise availability of grants
- Hold voluntary sector forum meeting
- Provide service specifications
- Explain the process
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
9Application Process
- Officers invite providers to series of meeting
linked to service specifications - Clear explanation by officers of service required
and key performance indicators - Officers encourage bids and partnership bids
- VSOs complete applications
- Form to include organisation profile
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
10Decision Making Process
- Service specification will include the specific
criteria on which applications will be assessed - Scoring system for each criteria (max 8 points)
- Preference will be given to organisations that
minimise their overheads and support service
convergence - Selection process should include a range of
assessment methods
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
11Scoring System
- Max of 8 points for each criteria
- 0 does not meet
- 2 partially meets
- 4 meets
- 6 more than meets
- 8 significant added value
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
12Direction Setting / Monitoring
- Officers should negotiate direction setting with
funded organisations - Level of monitoring should reflect risk
assessment of service being delivered by
successful organisation(s) - Funded organisations should be encouraged to
obtain external quality assessments - Officers should regularly communicate KBCs
strategic changes and next steps improvements to
voluntary sector partners
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services
13Timetable
- Consult and test new model deadline 10th
September - Executive Committee 22 September
- Communicate decision to Voluntary Sector Forum
October - Executive decision on Indicative funding to
voluntary sector 13 October - Implement new process from October
? Valerie Hitchman, Head of Community Services