Title: LECTURE 25. Course:
1LECTURE 25. Course Design of Systems
Structural Approach Dept. Communication
Networks Systems, Faculty of Radioengineering
Cybernetics Moscow Inst. of Physics and
Technology (University)
Mark Sh. Levin Inst. for Information
Transmission Problems, RAS
Email mslevin_at_acm.org / mslevin_at_iitp.ru
PLAN 1.Design of life cycle illustrative
example (morphological combinatorial
approach) 2.Morphological combinatorial approach
to multi-product system common
modules 2-product system (one common module, k
common modules) m-product system (one common
module, k common modules) 3.Recent references
Oct. 29, 2004
2Morphological clique
3Design (planning) of life cycle
Life cycle S
Manufac- turing
Trans- portation
Utiliza- tion
Research
Recycling
Design
Testing
R
DAB
M
L
T
UJI
P
R1
M1
P1
T1
L1
R2
M2
P2
T2
L2
R3
M3
P3
T3
L3
A1
B1
M4
T4
A2
B2
M5
I1
J1
A3
B3
I2
J2
B4
J3
Example SR3A1B2M5T2P1J2I1L3
4Design (planning) of life cycle
Life cycle S
Example 1 Design Manufacturing
S1D1(A2B1)M3
Example 2 Design Testing
S2D2(A1B3)T3
Example 3 Research Design
Manufacturing S3R2D(A3B1)M4
Example 4 Design Manufacturing
Transportation S1D(A3B3)M4T3
5Design (planning) of life cycle
Life cycle S
Design (Planning) of Life Cycle Life Cycle
Management Life Cycle Engineering Support of
Life Cycle Maintenance of Life Cycle
6Example for modular software package
Structure for Modular Software Package 3 layers
Layer 1 Control unit
Layer 2 Function units
. . .
. . .
Layer 3 Common modules
7Example for modular software package
General Structure for Modular Software Package
Layer 0 General control unit
Layer 1 Control unit
. . .
Layer 2 Function units
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Layer 3 Common modules
Layer 4 General common modules
82-product system
The 1st Product
P XYZ P1X1Y4Z3 P2X1Y1Z2
Y
Z
X
X1(3)
Y1(3)
Z1(1)
X2(1)
Y2(1)
Z2(1)
X3(1)
Y3(2)
Z3(2)
Z4(3)
Y4(3)
92-product system
The 1st Product
The 2nd Product
P ZBC P1Z1B3C3 P2Z1B1C2
P XYZ P1X1Y4Z3 P2X1Y1Z2
Y
Z
X
C
B
Z
X1(3)
Y1(3)
Z1(1)
C1(1)
B1(3)
Z1(1)
X2(1)
Y2(1)
Z2(1)
C2(1)
B2(1)
Z2(1)
X3(1)
Y3(2)
Z3(2)
C3(2)
B3(2)
Z3(2)
Z4(3)
Y4(3)
Z4(3)
102-product system (one common module)
The 1st Product
The 2nd Product
P ZBC P1Z1B3C3 P2Z1B1C2
P XYZ P1X1Y4Z3 P2X1Y1Z2
Y
Z
X
C
B
X1(3)
Y1(3)
Z1(1)
C1(1)
B1(3)
X2(1)
Y2(1)
Z2(1)
C2(1)
B2(1)
X3(1)
Y3(2)
Z3(2)
C3(2)
B3(2)
Z4(3)
Y4(3)
112-product system (one common module)
S P P
The 1st Product
The 2nd Product
P ZBC P1Z1B3C3 P2Z1B1C2
P XYZ P1X1Y4Z3 P2X1Y1Z2
Y
Z
X
C
B
X1(3)
Y1(3)
Z1(1)
C1(1)
B1(3)
X2(1)
Y2(1)
Z2(1)
C2(1)
B2(1)
X3(1)
Y3(2)
Z3(2)
C3(2)
B3(2)
Z4(3)
Y4(3)
122-product system (two common modules)
S P P
The 1st Product
The 2nd Product
P YZBC P1Y1Z1B3C3 P2Y2Z1B1C2
P XYZ P1X1Y4Z3 P2X1Y1Z2
Y
Z
X
C
B
X1(3)
Y1(3)
Z1(1)
C1(1)
B1(3)
X2(1)
Y2(1)
Z2(1)
C2(1)
B2(1)
X3(1)
Y3(2)
Z3(2)
C3(2)
B3(2)
Z4(3)
Y4(3)
13Recent English References
1. B. Agard, A. Kusiak, Data-mining-based
methodology for the design of product
family. Int. J. of Prod. Res., 42(15),
2955-2969, 2004. 2.C.Y. Baldwin, K.B.
Clark,Design Rules The Power of Modularity. MIT
Press, 2000. 3.J. Dahmus, J.P.
Gonzalez-Zugasti, K.N. Otto, Modular product
architecture, Design Studies
22(5), 409-424, 2001. 4. G. Dobrescu, Y. Reich,
Progressive sharing of modules among product
variants. Computer-Aided Design
35(9), 791-806, 2003. 5.X. Du, J. Jiao, M.M.
Tseng, Architecture of product family
Fundamentals and methodology.
Concurrent Eng. Res. and Appl. 9(4), 309-325,
2001. 6.J.K. Gershenson, G.J. Prasad, S.
Allamneni, Modular product design A life-cycle
view. Trans. of the SDPS 3(4), 13-26,
1999. 7.J.P. Gonzalez-Zugasti, K.N. Otto, J.D.
Baker, A method for architecting product
platform. Res. in Eng. Des. 12(2), 61-72,
2000. 8.T.K.P. Holmqvist, M.L. Person, Analysis
and improvement of product modularization
methods Their ability to deal with complex
products. Systems Engineering 6(3),
195-209, 2003. 9.C.C. Huang, A. Kusiak,
Modularity in design of products and systems.
IEEE Trans. on Syst.,
Man and Cybern. - Part A, 28(1), 66-77, 1998.
10. M.Sh. Levin, Modular system synthesis
Example for packaged composite software,
IEEE Tr. on SMC-Part C, 35(4), 544-553, 2005.
11.M.Sh. Levin, Combinatorial design of
multiproduct system common modules.
Elsevier Server of Preprints in CS, 2003.
14Recent English References
12.M. Kokkolaras, R. Fellini, H.M. Kim, N.
Michelena, and P. Papalambros,
Extension of the target cascading
formulation to the design of product family,
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,
24(4), 293-301, 2002. 13.A. Kusiak, Integrated
product and process Design a modularity
perspective. J. of Eng. Des.,
13(3), 223-231, 2002. 14.A. Messac, M.P.
Martinez, T.W. Simpson, Effective product family
design using physical programming.
Engineering Optimization 34(3), 245-261,
2002. 15.M.H. Meyer, A.P. Lehnerd, The Power of
Product Platforms,
The Free Press, New York, 1997.
16.J.H. Mikkola, O. Gassmann,
Managing modularity of product architectures
Toward an integrated theory. IEEE
Trans. on Eng. Manag. 18(3), 204-218, 2003.
17.D. Robertson, K. Ulrich, Planning for product
platforms, Sloan Manag. Review 39(4),
19-34, 1998. 18.M.S.
Sawhney, Leverage high-variety strategies From
portfolio thinking to platform
thinking. J. of the Academy of Marketing Science
26(1), 54-61, 1998. 19.D.M. Sharman, A.A.
Yassine, Charactrizing complex product
architecture. Systems
Engineering 7(1), 35-60, 2004. 20.Z. Siddique,
D.W. Rosen, On combinatorial design spaces for
the configuration design of product
family. AI EDAM 15(2) 91-108, 2001. 21.T.W.
Simpson, J.R.A. Maier, F. Mistree, Product
platform design methods and
application. Res. in Eng. Des. 13(1), 2-22,2001.