Eugene C' Figg Jr' Medal For Signature Bridges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Eugene C' Figg Jr' Medal For Signature Bridges

Description:

Eugene C' Figg Jr' Medal For Signature Bridges – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: kimleyhorn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Eugene C' Figg Jr' Medal For Signature Bridges


1
(No Transcript)
2
What Makes a Bridge Historic?
  • Anything over 50 years old
  • Important in the areas of engineering, history,
    transportation
  • Important to the surrounding community
  • All historic bridges are by definition important
    to their surrounding communities
  • Also an important means of commerce and travel

Royal Park Bridge
3
Royal Park Bridge, Palm Beach County, FL
4
Evolution of Royal Park Bridge
1950s
1990s
5
Royal Park Bridge PDE Study Alternatives
6
Royal Park Bridge, 2005
7
Royal Park Bridge, 2005
8

Royal Park Bridge2007
2007 International Bridge ConferenceEugene C.
Figg Jr. Medal for Signature Bridgesawarded to
the Florida Department of Transportation for
theROYAL PARK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT for a single
recent outstanding achievement in bridge
engineering that, through vision and innovation,
provides an icon to the community for which it
was designed.
9
Flagler Memorial Bridge, Palm Beach County, FL
10
Flagler Memorial Bridge,1930s
11
Flagler Memorial Bridge, 1950s
12
Flagler Memorial Bridge, 2007
13
Flagler Memorial Bridge, 2007
14
Flagler Memorial Bridge, 2007
15
Existing Bridge Structurally Deficient
16
Existing Bridge Structurally Deficient
17
Existing BridgeConditions
18
Existing Bridge Conditions
19
Existing Bridge Conditions
20
Existing Bridge Functionally Obsolete
21
Planning for the New FlaglerMemorial Bridge
22
Alternative 1A and 2A(at grade)
Alternative 1A and 2A WITH FLAGLER DRIVE AT GRADE
CONCEPT (same location as existing bridge)
23
Alternative 1B and 2B(with ramps)
Alternative 1B and 2B BRIDGE OVER FLAGLER DRIVE
WITH RAMPS TO FLAGLER DRIVE (new bridge to the
south of the existing bridge)
24
Alternative 1B and 2B(at grade)
Alternative 1B and 2B WITH FLAGLER DRIVE AT GRADE
CONCEPT (new bridge to the south of the existing
bridge)
25
Some Proposed Improvements
Flagler Drive looking North at existing Flagler
Memorial Bridge
Proposed At-Grade Intersection with Flagler
Drive
26
Some Proposed Improvements
Flagler Drive looking South at existing Flagler
Memorial Bridge
Proposed At-Grade Intersection with Flagler Drive
27
When Should a Historic Bridge Be Rehabilitated?
  • When a communitys desire to retain existing
    bridge is extremely high
  • If at least 15 of existing bridge can be
    retained
  • If permitting process for new bridge is complex
  • If bridge can be improved to an acceptable level
    without adversely affecting its historic
    significance

28
Disadvantages of Rehabilitation
  • Navigable waterway under bridge is not improved
  • Lane widths, sidewalk bicycle lane
    accommodations typically remain unchanged or less
    than desired
  • No opportunity to architecturally enhance bridge
    appearance

29
When Should a Historic Bascule Bridge Be
Replaced?
  • Low structural sufficiency is key reason
  • Bridge maintenance report rates structural
    components on a scale of 1 through 10
  • If any component rates lower than 5, further
    evaluation is required
  • Functional obsolescence is second reason
  • Doesnt meet current design standards
  • Heavy traffic load
  • High incidence of crashes

30
When Should a Historic Bascule Bridge Be
Replaced?
  • They are difficult to maintain
  • Design life is typically 50 years
  • Frequently built with combinations of wood,
    concrete, and/or steel piles
  • Superstructures are typically reinforced concrete
  • Salt environments are hostile to concrete and
    steel
  • Bascule bridges are usually low further
    exposing bridge members to harsh salt and spray
  • Modern structures resist effects of salt
  • Design life is typically 75 years
  • Concrete is treated with special hardeners

31
75-Year Design Life
  • Designed for ship impacts
  • Designed for bridge scour
  • Superstructure can be widened as much as necessary

32
Few Written Protocols or Guidelines
  • Have all possibilities been considered to make
    bridge safe and maintain its historical
    significance?
  • Rehabilitation when is and isnt it practical?
  • Historic preservation at what point does
    rehabilitation adversely affect a bridge?

as reported in AASHTOs Guidelines for
Historic Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement,
2007
33
Engineering Judgment BalancedWith Historic
Preservation
  • How to address deficiencies load capacity,
    geometry, safety, environmental issues
  • How to preserve NRHP bridges
  • Balanced decision making is key

34
New Federal Replacement Fund Guidelines Announced
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) officials
    conceded at a national conference that Bridge
    Replacement Fund guidelines are actually at odds
    with the goal of preserving historic bridges.
    Current guidelines provide 80 of the cost of
    building new bridges, but preclude using these
    monies to restore historic bridges to their fully
    functional condition. FHWA is conducting an
    internal review of this process to address the
    stated goal of encouraging bridge preservation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com