Nature of High Ability Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Nature of High Ability Students

Description:

College and Career Counseling for High Ability Students. Secondary Support ... 4 High Ability instructors in LOGOS. High Ability instructor / counselor at High School ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: gwinn4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nature of High Ability Students


1
Nature of High Ability Students
  • Introduction to High Ability Education
  • RCS

2
Domains of Giftedness
  • General intellectual
  • Specific academic
  • General creative
  • Technical and practical arts
  • Visual and performing arts
  • Interpersonal (Leadership)

3
State Definition for High Ability
  • A student who
  • 1) performs at or shows the potential for
    performing at an outstanding level of
    accomplishment in at least one domain when
    compared with other students of the same age,
    experience, or environment
  • and
  • 2) is characterized by exceptional gifts,
    talents, motivation, or interests.

4
State Requirements
  • Districts must identify and serve K-12
  • Districts must identify and serve 1) general
    intellectual and 2) specific academic
  • Identification process must be multi-faceted
  • Indiana offers professional development support
    1/2 tuition reimbursement for high ability
    coursework for teachers providing high ability
    services 1/3 tuition reimbursement for teachers
    contemplating providing high ability services

5
RCS High Ability Mission
  • To engage and challenge high ability learners
    to reach their full intellectual,
    social-emotional, and creative potential.
  • BBPC 2005

6
Elementary Services in RCS
  • Pullout program one half day per week
  • LOGOS General intellectual
  • ASPIRE Specific academic
  • (participation by trimester topic)
  • Flexible grouping within classrooms/
  • grade levels
  • Math / Reading

7
Elementary Support Services
  • HA Professional Development Support Staff
  • One representative in each building
  • High Ability Coordinator
  • 2.5 High Ability Instructors
  • State grant funding for staffing, supplies, and
    professional development opportunities

8
Middle School Program Options
  • LOGOS Program
  • General intellectual
  • Elementary identification
  • ASPIRE classes
  • Specific Academic
  • Language Arts/ Math
  • Scantron and teacher recommendation

9
High School Program Options
  • Humanties Class
  • Offered each trimester
  • Portfolio for identification
  • Honors Classes
  • AP Classes
  • Dual Enrollment
  • Project Lead the Way
  • College and Career Counseling for High Ability
    Students

10
Secondary Support
  • High Ability Secondary Prof. Dev. Support Team
    (New this year)
  • 4 High Ability instructors in LOGOS
  • High Ability instructor / counselor at High
    School
  • High Ability Coordinator
  • State grant funding for staffing, supplies, and
    professional development opportunities

11
Options with Board Guidelines
  • Subject Acceleration
  • Grade Acceleration
  • 2 or more years above grade level
  • Above average intelligence (130)
  • Social-emotional maturity

12
RCS Current Identification Process
  • Who is tested?
  • 2nd and 5th graders in pool (Pool consists of
    students scoring in the 85th percentile in
    reading or math on fall Scantron.)
  • Students new to district recommended for testing.
  • Students recommended for testing by teacher,
    student, and/or parent recommendation.

13
RCS Current Identification Process
  • When are students tested?
  • Pool students are tested January through April.
    Results are mailed to parents by May 1.
    Exceptions include students who require more
    information.
  • Recommended students are tested as requested.

14
RCS Current Identification Process
  • Assessments collected for profile
  • Scantron (standardized measure of achievement)
  • Scales for Rating the Behavior Characteristics of
    Superior Students (Survey for qualitative data,
    new in 2008)
  • Naglieri (standardized non-verbal measure of
    ability)
  • This will be replaced in 2008 with CogAT, a more
    comprehensive measure of intelligence including
    nonverbal, quantitative, and verbal reasoning
    abilities.
  • Additional assessments used for appeals or to
    gather more information
  • Torrance (standardized measure of creativity)
  • SIGS (parent/teacher rating scale)
  • K-Bit (alternate individual ability test)

15
RCS Current Identification Process
  • Steps in process of identification
  • Group Naglieri (CogAT) tests administered to
    students in pool.
  • Teachers complete SRBCSS for students in pool.
  • Team examines profiles CogAT, Scantron,
    SRBCSS.
  • Team sorts clearly qualifies from clearly does
    not based on profiles. Team reconsiders profiles
    with inconsistent scores or consistent scores in
    80 range. Determines additional information to
    be collected.
  • Additional assessments collected and reviewed.
  • Parents and schools notified of results.

16
Information on Testing Tools
  • Naglieri Non-verbal intelligence/ reasoning
    test using visual puzzles. Should not
    disadvantage English learners or children from
    poverty. Does not assess quantitative or verbal
    reasoningboth are critical to school
    performance.
  • Torrance Scores do not correlate with
    intelligence. Useful to include a student never
    used to exclude a student.
  • SIGS Rating scales for teachers and parents to
    provide input based on observations.
  • SRBCSSanother comprehensive behavior rating
    scale.
  • K-Bit Brief intelligence test that includes
    language. Used for children who indicate verbal
    strengths and have inconsistent reading and
    ability percentiles when tested with Naglieri.

17
Students Who Do Not Qualify
  • may be eligible for participation by trimester.
    Elementary pullout trimesters are arranged by
    subject area
  • Trimester I Social Studies/ Leadership
  • Trimester II Language Arts/ Research
  • Trimester III Science/ Mathematics

18
ASPIRE Participation Protocol
  • Teacher completes the appropriate subject area
    rating scale for student, including academic
    subject area Scantron scores.
  • Teacher meets with HA instructor to review
    rating, assessments, and space availability. If
    teachers determine placement is appropriate,
    parents are notified for permission to
    participate for the trimester only.
  • Work samples and assessments are collected during
    participation to review for identification
    purposes as needed.

19
Exit Procedures
  • Students typically exit the program through
    parental request. If high ability instructors
    see that an identified student does not need the
    services, a conference must be held with all
    parties to consider the students performance and
    service needs. Participants in the conference
    determine appropriate placement for student.

20
General Tips Role of Classroom Teacher
  • Be knowledgeable about high ability
    characteristics. Studies show low correlations
    for teacher recommendations and actual
    identification results. Yet teachers are in a
    position to be students best advocates.
  • Include classroom activities that allow students
    to demonstrate their complex thinking skills,
    leadership, and creativity. Document what you
    see.
  • Pre-assess regularly to find out what students
    already know and can do. Adjust instruction
    accordingly.
  • Work with colleagues to provide flexible
    groupings and differentiated assignments for high
    ability students.

21
Role of GT Prof. Dev. Consultant
  • Be a liaison between HA coordinator, HA
    instructors, and classroom teachers.
  • Access forms in buildings for grade skipping and
    requests for testing.
  • Be knowledgeable about HA students
    characteristics, needs, and the identification
    process.
  • Provide assistance in identification process.
  • Advocate for HA students in building.
  • Collect data to demonstrate HA student progress
    in building.

22
Final Notes
  • Identifying students for high ability services
    is complex and inexact. We maintain a continuous
    improvement stance, adjusting and modifying
    procedures as we learn from our practice and the
    best efforts of researchers.
  • Identification will not improve
    learningresponding to our high ability students
    with appropriate instruction will. Our best
    efforts must be focused on that end.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com