b-production cross-section at the TeVatron - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

b-production cross-section at the TeVatron

Description:

Chicago. p source. Booster. p. p. 1.96 TeV. CDF. D . Run 1. 1.8 TeV. 0.1 fb-1. 11. 6.5. 09. 8. 4.7 ... Error bars show statistical errors. 17,000 e m events ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: onn1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: b-production cross-section at the TeVatron


1
b-production cross-section at the TeVatron
  • Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0
  • kajfasz_at_fnal.gov
  • for the CDF and D0 collaborations

2
The TeVatron
Run 1 1.8 TeV 0.1 fb-1
Run 2 1.96 TeV
FY base (fb-1) stretch (fb-1)
05 1.7 2.5
06 3.2 5.0
07 shutdown shutdown
08 4.7 8
09 6.5 11
3
b-jet production Run I results
D0 - 1.8TeV
4
b-jet production phenomenology
Careful treatment of Fragmentation Functions
helps ...
Binnewies, Kniehl, Kramer - hep-ph/9802231 Kniehl
- hep-ph/0211008 Re-determine LO and NLO
B-meson Fragmentation Functions using data
collected at LEP1
PRELIMINARY
Cacciari, Nason - hep-ph/0204025 Nason -
hep-ph/0301003 retuned FF and NLL
resummations (F0NLL)
5
b-jet production phenomenology
R.D. Field - hep-ph/0201112
flavor exitation
shower/fragmentation
3 sources
flavor creation
LLMC estimates rather uncertain, but ...
CDF
integrated b-quark cross-section for pT gt pTmin
6
Run I CDF detector
7
Run I Secondary Vertex Correlations
  • Uses 90 pb-1 sample taken by CDF in 1994-1995 run
    (Run IB)
  • Enrich b content of data by requiring an electron
    or muon trigger
  • Use tracking information to reconstruct decay
    vertices of both B hadrons
  • Compare correlations of these reconstructed
    vertices to PYTHIA and HERWIG predictions
  • Use Monte Carlo to convert raw secondary vertex
    correlations to B hadron correlations

8
Run I Secondary Vertex Correlations
  • ?? opening angle between momentum vectors of
    secondary vertices in the transverse plane
  • Detector effects are simulated in Monte Carlo
  • Relative contribution from flavor creation,
    flavor excitation, and gluon splitting varied to
    give best match to data
  • Similar distributions for muons

9
Run I Measured B-Hadron Correlations
  • ?? opening angle between measured B directions
    in transverse plane
  • Detector effects unfolded from data using PYTHIA
  • other corrections
  • mistags
  • tags from prompt charm
  • sequential double tags
  • Error bars show statistical errors
  • 17,000 em events
  • consistant with substantial contribution from
    flavor excitationgluon splitting

10
Run II D0 detector
Solenoid Central Fiber Tracker Silicon Microstrip
Tracker
Calorimeters
Tracker
Muon System
anti-protons
protons
Beamline Shielding
20 m
Electronics
11
D0 Integrated Luminosity
April 19, 2002 - March 11, 2003
Current trigger rates L1 rate 1KHz L2 rate 0.6
KHz L3 rate 50 Hz
February data taking efficiency 90 per
run 85 overall
12
RunII b-jet cross-section
  • Strategy
  • use 3.4 pb-1 of data (1.96 TeV -
    02/28/02-05/10/02)
  • Measure mjet cross section
  • Extract b-content using PTRel
  • Data selection and kinematic cuts
  • jet 0.5 cone
  • m track measured in muon system only
  • hjet lt 0.6
  • ETjet gt 20 GeV
  • hm lt 0.8
  • pTm gt 6 GeV/c
  • DR(jet,m) lt 0.7

13
RunII mjet cross-section
Jet reco efficiency 100 for E gt 20 GeV m reco
efficiency 43.7 ? 0.8(stat) ? 2.2(syst)
Jet resolution dijet pT imbalance m momentum
resolution from central tracks
14
RunII b-tagging
PTRel for jets with 20 GeV lt ET lt 25 GeV
signal template from b -gt m Monte-Carlo backgrou
nd template from 1.5 million QCD events
Fit PTRel templates in jet ET bins
15
RunII b-jet fraction
b-jet fraction as a function of jet ET
of bins constrained by statistical limitations
of background templates fitted with functional
form a b/ETjet
16
RunII b-jet cross-section
  • ansatz function used to unfold the calorimeter
    resolution
  • dominant error from jet energy scale
  • agreement with data similar to what was seen in
    Run I
  • band covers uncertainty due to
  • b-quark mass
  • renormalization/factorization scales
  • pdfs
  • fragmentation functions

17
Conclusions
  • better phenomenological understanding of heavy
    flavor production (sources, retuned FF, NLL
    resummations ...) tend to make the shape and
    normalization of calculated distributions closer
    to their measured ones. There does not seem to be
    a need for new phenomena here ...
  • b-bbar correlation distributions indicate that at
    the TeVatron all three sources of b-quarks are
    important.
  • We are just beginning to reap the fruits of RunII
    data. New results will follow soon from both CDF
    and D0, stay tuned ...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com